2.0L LNF Performance Tech 260hp and 260 lb-ft of torque Turbocharged tuner version.

Trifecta Fail!

Old 10-25-2016, 09:55 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
63 Nova SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-12-12
Location: Indiana
Posts: 5,485
Received 316 Likes on 296 Posts
Originally Posted by ECaulk
Just noticed what turbo you're running, to get 370whp out of it is pretty damn good if you're not running an ethanol blend. If you had a 6262 and only got 370whp then I'd say thats a mild (very) tune, but that little turbo can't push much more air. If you want more power you'll need a bigger turbo, ethanol, methanol injection, or nitrous.
Your prior owner vadyx is what sold me on the + before the r came out. I am on e47 and Jon worked his magic on the tune. It's boost ramped and mild enough to daily in the summer. I'm also running e47. 93 I would guess to be 340. 6758 going on over the winter while it's parked but it will be a mild tune since I'm in stock fuel system.
Old 10-26-2016, 06:56 AM
  #27  
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
ECaulk's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-19-10
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 26,574
Received 836 Likes on 733 Posts
Originally Posted by 63 Nova SS
Your prior owner vadyx is what sold me on the + before the r came out. I am on e47 and Jon worked his magic on the tune. It's boost ramped and mild enough to daily in the summer. I'm also running e47. 93 I would guess to be 340. 6758 going on over the winter while it's parked but it will be a mild tune since I'm in stock fuel system.
I put 360 down on pump with the +, it was a pretty aggressive tune. I'm kinda jelly you're going to the 6758, I might get the 6758 next summer when I'm drop an LDK long block in. I got some bad fuel and had knock on high load (just so happened to be logging it) and now cylinder 2 compression is about 8% lower than the rest, still not in the danger zone but to close for my liking.


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:52 PM.