Dyno results of our 05 SS, Video of car on dyno !!
#51
Senior Member
Join Date: 04-11-04
Location: patterson, ca
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by zinner
How did you come up with the numbers ? Just curious I will be the first to say the GM site can be wrong
#52
Originally Posted by mchat
91, best we can get at the pump here in Az.
On a couple of the runs I kept an eye on the knock meter on the D-Tec. Some of the chopiness is because of how rich the car runs...
On a couple of the runs I kept an eye on the knock meter on the D-Tec. Some of the chopiness is because of how rich the car runs...
I'll have to visit this site more to check in on future results for these cars. Looking like some good competition from the factory for the SRT-4
#53
New Member
Join Date: 09-01-04
Location: Bloomingburg, NY
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
here's where i found the info: http://media.gm.com/division/2005_pr...nch/specs.html
here's the main page: http://media.gm.com/division/2005_pr...nch/index.html
here's the main page: http://media.gm.com/division/2005_pr...nch/index.html
#54
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
Join Date: 04-06-05
Location: Houston Texas
Posts: 885
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ive never seen any more than 1-3 hp difference AT MOST on a dyno.
Fyi, I think the fourth gear dyno runs were about 1.5 - 2 hp lower in fourth gear.
All of the cars I have ever dyno tested in though, have been in third gear, so thats what I posted.
Fyi, I think the fourth gear dyno runs were about 1.5 - 2 hp lower in fourth gear.
All of the cars I have ever dyno tested in though, have been in third gear, so thats what I posted.
#58
New Member
Join Date: 12-14-04
Location: Las Vegas, Nv.
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Modernceo
Ive never seen any more than 1-3 hp difference AT MOST on a dyno.
Fyi, I think the fourth gear dyno runs were about 1.5 - 2 hp lower in fourth gear.
All of the cars I have ever dyno tested in though, have been in third gear, so thats what I posted.
Fyi, I think the fourth gear dyno runs were about 1.5 - 2 hp lower in fourth gear.
All of the cars I have ever dyno tested in though, have been in third gear, so thats what I posted.
#59
Also, what was the correction factor used?
Just curious, b/c I know some of the SRT-4 dyno's that produced 240+whp on a bone stock SRT-4 the correction factor was like 1.21 which is a little weird to me.
Just curious, b/c I know some of the SRT-4 dyno's that produced 240+whp on a bone stock SRT-4 the correction factor was like 1.21 which is a little weird to me.
#60
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
Join Date: 04-06-05
Location: Houston Texas
Posts: 885
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
93 Octane used
1000 miles on vehicle currently
Ive got over 250-300+ dyno runs on these vehicles we have used for projects :
95 Neon
97 Neon
01 Neon RT
03 SRT-4
03 SRT-4
1000 miles on vehicle currently
Ive got over 250-300+ dyno runs on these vehicles we have used for projects :
95 Neon
97 Neon
01 Neon RT
03 SRT-4
03 SRT-4
#62
So in other words. This car is strongly over rated that is was i am getting from this thead.....? right ????? and if so, what are the REAL number for the car???? HP TRQ??? and if they got that much power from just a filter drop then i guess an actual CAI or SRA will make it a little quicker correct?
#63
New Member
Join Date: 04-17-05
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by fifasf
So in other words. This car is strongly over rated that is was i am getting from this thead.....? right ????? and if so, what are the REAL number for the car???? HP TRQ??? and if they got that much power from just a filter drop then i guess an actual CAI or SRA will make it a little quicker correct?
#65
Senior Member
Join Date: 04-11-04
Location: patterson, ca
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by fifasf
So in other words. This car is strongly over rated that is was i am getting from this thead.....? right ????? and if so, what are the REAL number for the car???? HP TRQ??? and if they got that much power from just a filter drop then i guess an actual CAI or SRA will make it a little quicker correct?
#68
Senior Member
Join Date: 04-02-05
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 976
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So correct me if I'm wrong but the cobalt actually has More HP stock or with a drop in than the Neon SRT4? The SRT 4 has 230 .... and it seems like everyone agrees the SS is more than that.
#69
Moderator Alumni
Originally Posted by Chevy4Life85
So correct me if I'm wrong but the cobalt actually has More HP stock or with a drop in than the Neon SRT4? The SRT 4 has 230 .... and it seems like everyone agrees the SS is more than that.
Chevy reports 205 hp. That's 12 hp more. If some has another dyno sheet to contest that figure please go ahead and post it
#70
Senior Member
Join Date: 04-11-04
Location: patterson, ca
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
keep in mind the srt-4 is xtremly underated also, its pushing stock higher hp and tq numbers than the cobalt is. i believe they are dynoing around 220hp at the wheels and 230-240 tq at the wheels, so thats saying it has a good amount more hp and tq than dodge claims.
#71
Yeah most SRT's baseline at 220 - 240 hp at the wheels, with 250+ torque. With that nice torque curve, you should get some decent launches, something that is a bit difficult for us. Hopefully, GM didn't program your ECU as **** as ours, with a SC you are ripe for mods like cams/headers/ exhaust that should put you over 300hp pretty easily. (Cams on a SRT are known to lose hp ) I see 300+ being your big problem number, as that will be the limit of the SC. Is anyone working on a bigger SC / turbo swap yet?
#72
Senior Member
Join Date: 04-11-04
Location: patterson, ca
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
theres currently a twin charger setup, gravana tuning is developing a turbo charger setup to work with the supercharger, it should see 300hp easily. and i'm sure that will be with low boost like 5-6 psi. and up the boost onthe turbo and the supercharger and 400-500 isnt out of the question imo.
#73
Senior Member
Join Date: 04-11-04
Location: patterson, ca
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
look here morew details about the twin charger setup https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/show...hlight=gravana
#74
Well I plan on doing a cold air intake on my SS and eventually a cat back. Any suggestions on what brand of cat back? All I have to say is I'm not complaining that they under-rate the cars. I don't exactly line my wallet with bills so that helps the insurance.
Tom
Tom
#75
Moderator Alumni
Originally Posted by 05RedSS
Well I plan on doing a cold air intake on my SS and eventually a cat back. Any suggestions on what brand of cat back? All I have to say is I'm not complaining that they under-rate the cars. I don't exactly line my wallet with bills so that helps the insurance.
Tom
Tom
I am working with TOG (the other guys products- real company) to get a header worked up. If that works out I am going to be going a full 3 " exhaust , including a high flow cat.
It seems that all the 3 inch mufflers seem to be race series so I am afraid that they will be overly loud. I really want performance without excessive noise.