2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

Flowthrough Tank for track??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-06-2015, 12:04 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
southal cobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-11-11
Location: mobile
Posts: 898
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by mrbelvedere
you are wrong fluid constantly flows through the option b tank. fluid comes out the top of heat exchanger into the tank then out the bottom of the tank back into the system

it could not constantly bleed the system if coolant did not flow through it

adding volume helps but just adding an extra quart wont do that much
through a .04" orifice correct? that is so minimal that it would make little to no difference on flow.

Last edited by southal cobalt; 04-06-2015 at 12:19 PM.
Old 04-06-2015, 12:15 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
southal cobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-11-11
Location: mobile
Posts: 898
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by Staged07SS
Ill say this again..... Opt b is not there to add coolant to the system!!!!!

Stop comparing flow through tanks to opt b.
i get that. i was trying to explain why opt b does not increase capacity even though it has a larger tank... and yes, i did use a comparison to help my argument, but i was not trying to compare opt b to flow through.

i havent used either and dont plan to. but dont get so defensive about it. the differences between the two mean everything, and someone just trying to install something without understanding why makes no sense.

Last edited by southal cobalt; 04-06-2015 at 12:28 PM.
Old 04-06-2015, 12:29 PM
  #28  
Administrator
Administrator
Platinum Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Staged07SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-30-07
Location: NEPA
Posts: 14,331
Received 197 Likes on 175 Posts
Originally Posted by southal cobalt
i get that. i was trying to explain why opt b does not increase capacity even though it has a larger tank... and yes, i did use a comparison to help my argument, but i was not trying to compare opt b to flow through.

i havent used either and dont plan to. but dont get so defensive about it. the differences between the two mean everything, and someone just trying to install something without understanding why makes no sense.
I'm not getting defensive at all....

I'm merely trying to prevent incorrect info being spread is all. Too many people think opt b was designed to add coolant to the intercooling system, and dont understand what its really there for.

My comment towards yours was more of a general comment towards everyone, so don't take it personal.
Old 04-06-2015, 07:03 PM
  #29  
Super Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
mrbelvedere's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-03-05
Location: KY
Posts: 8,165
Received 51 Likes on 45 Posts
that .040 restrictor moves more water then you think
Old 04-06-2015, 08:22 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
southal cobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-11-11
Location: mobile
Posts: 898
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by mrbelvedere
that .040 restrictor moves more water then you think
im getting about a quarter of a liter a minute from orifice equations. that is a bit more than id have expected.

Originally Posted by Staged07SS
I'm not getting defensive at all....

I'm merely trying to prevent incorrect info being spread is all. Too many people think opt b was designed to add coolant to the intercooling system, and dont understand what its really there for.

My comment towards yours was more of a general comment towards everyone, so don't take it personal.
thats my bad
Old 04-06-2015, 09:26 PM
  #31  
Super Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
mrbelvedere's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-03-05
Location: KY
Posts: 8,165
Received 51 Likes on 45 Posts
i would say its a little more then that
Old 04-06-2015, 11:09 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
southal cobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-11-11
Location: mobile
Posts: 898
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
^ youre right. the online calculator i used is apparently off by a factor of 60. i worked out the dimensions and they are posting a flow rate of 15 liters per hour when it should actually be 15 liters per minute.

heres the calculator:
Calculator: Water Flow Rate through an Orifice | TLV
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
turbochargedss2012
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
11
09-20-2023 12:17 PM
taintedred07
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
32
05-28-2022 03:47 AM
Extremespeed
South Pacific
0
09-29-2015 04:34 AM
riceburner
Appearance
13
09-26-2015 12:57 AM



Quick Reply: Flowthrough Tank for track??



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:06 PM.