lsj air to air problem
06-13-2009, 06:18 AM
#103
So please, if there is a argued point on here that is incorrect and is not or has not been addressed, please do so. Again, I say this as nicely as possible, because often in the past you've helped me through various PMed questions. I'm just hoping you stay as helpful as you once were
06-13-2009, 01:39 PM
#105
Rent me! per hour
Join Date: 03-22-07
Location: Still fixing others mistakes.
Posts: 24,185
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes
on
14 Posts
dude, area...you have no idea how much these posts bug me. You're a good guy, and are generally very helpful, but posts like this are so frustrating. What I post is what I understand, the way I understand it. If something is wrong, it's not helpful at all to say something along the lines of "the stuff in this thread..." but to actually correct the errors so that we can learn is. If you're going to point out a flaw in someones logic or statement, then poin it out, dont just say "you're wrong" and not explain your reasoning. I'd almost rather you not make any comment at all if you're not going to be helpful (although I would hate to believe something works in a way that is incorrect, as I would likely pass that information on, further causing people to believe an incorrect statement).
So please, if there is a argued point on here that is incorrect and is not or has not been addressed, please do so. Again, I say this as nicely as possible, because often in the past you've helped me through various PMed questions. I'm just hoping you stay as helpful as you once were
So please, if there is a argued point on here that is incorrect and is not or has not been addressed, please do so. Again, I say this as nicely as possible, because often in the past you've helped me through various PMed questions. I'm just hoping you stay as helpful as you once were
you telling me what to do is NOT a wise idea. i do NOT have to be helpful in this thread because someone else already posted the answer. multiple times. so how about this junior. you go back and read and find the answer that people so valiantly over looked. stop thinking you actually know something before you get yourself into a situation you can't get out of.
hell i don't have to be helpful period. there is not a law, or rule that says I have to help anyone, or be nice.
06-13-2009, 01:52 PM
#106
^^^^ i like the pic in the sig
i was boosting only 3 psi unless i acelerated faster than my bypass would open up. i disconnected my boost bypass and found where my boost went hahaha i got an appointment to get the car tuned on sat at 9am then i get to go to import wars and see what the car will do... should be a fun day. o and i get to buy meth i havnt had any in soo long i cant wait
i was boosting only 3 psi unless i acelerated faster than my bypass would open up. i disconnected my boost bypass and found where my boost went hahaha i got an appointment to get the car tuned on sat at 9am then i get to go to import wars and see what the car will do... should be a fun day. o and i get to buy meth i havnt had any in soo long i cant wait
06-13-2009, 04:20 PM
#107
i do not have to explain a ******* thing. it already has been explained. most people in THIS thread are to dumb to even remotely catch the bits of information being put out there.
you telling me what to do is NOT a wise idea. i do NOT have to be helpful in this thread because someone else already posted the answer. multiple times. so how about this junior. you go back and read and find the answer that people so valiantly over looked. stop thinking you actually know something before you get yourself into a situation you can't get out of.
hell i don't have to be helpful period. there is not a law, or rule that says I have to help anyone, or be nice.
you telling me what to do is NOT a wise idea. i do NOT have to be helpful in this thread because someone else already posted the answer. multiple times. so how about this junior. you go back and read and find the answer that people so valiantly over looked. stop thinking you actually know something before you get yourself into a situation you can't get out of.
hell i don't have to be helpful period. there is not a law, or rule that says I have to help anyone, or be nice.
#2 I dont know which argued point in this thread is the correct one (all you're saying is one of the many answers to a question is the correct one...)
#3 What is with the attitude... I tried to sound as respectable as I could, and you come back at me like that? Ridiculously unnecessary....
06-13-2009, 06:03 PM
#109
ugh. you totally misinterpreted what i said. All i was saying was it would be nice to hear what exactly im being corrected on instead of just hearing that I am wrong, as that isnt helpful. You can do whatever you like, but I'm always trying to learn, and finding out I am wrong about something when i dont know what the something is isnt helping. I'm definitely not ordering you around..not at all. Just looking for clarification and hoping(not demanding) you give it to me.
06-16-2009, 06:33 PM
#111
Senior Member
Join Date: 06-20-06
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
what a **** show.
novel idea, massively nasty execution.
take the flow rate @ the PR you want to run and match that up with pipe sizing, my initial numbers come out to about ~1.68in of cross section with the SC at max eff% flow/pr.
this is not a turbo, thus its flow rate is no where in that neighborhood. no need for 2.5in piping, so dropping pipe size will help control the MUCH larger PD your getting across that rats nest of pipe and couplers.
the internal flow area of your system is HUGE, 7* of bend = 1ft
its times like these you need to look at the well done street-minded turbo set ups of the world, notice how short and direct they run the charge pipe, notice how the IC is just the size needed for the flow rate.
things like this will take this idea from its current disaster and turn it into something worthwhile.
novel idea, massively nasty execution.
take the flow rate @ the PR you want to run and match that up with pipe sizing, my initial numbers come out to about ~1.68in of cross section with the SC at max eff% flow/pr.
this is not a turbo, thus its flow rate is no where in that neighborhood. no need for 2.5in piping, so dropping pipe size will help control the MUCH larger PD your getting across that rats nest of pipe and couplers.
the internal flow area of your system is HUGE, 7* of bend = 1ft
its times like these you need to look at the well done street-minded turbo set ups of the world, notice how short and direct they run the charge pipe, notice how the IC is just the size needed for the flow rate.
things like this will take this idea from its current disaster and turn it into something worthwhile.
Ok, I see some people going all wanna-be engineer here.
Stop it, and read what a real one has to say.
Your matching area's here, that is not the solution.
You need to match max flow areas, take the max flow rate from the TVS comp map, along with it's PR at that flow, and play the math game.
U find the flow rates of pipe sizes, make sure u note what pressure it was tested at, then u can dirive the the needed cross section.
It will be far shy of the ~3.5in number u have now, it's even less then 2.0in.
God the pressure drop alone on a 3.5in should make you want to find the answer.
Run the math, the answers rite there.
Stop it, and read what a real one has to say.
Your matching area's here, that is not the solution.
You need to match max flow areas, take the max flow rate from the TVS comp map, along with it's PR at that flow, and play the math game.
U find the flow rates of pipe sizes, make sure u note what pressure it was tested at, then u can dirive the the needed cross section.
It will be far shy of the ~3.5in number u have now, it's even less then 2.0in.
God the pressure drop alone on a 3.5in should make you want to find the answer.
Run the math, the answers rite there.
06-19-2009, 03:44 AM
#115
BTW, I just want to say thanks for keeping this an educated discussion. It seems these are rare these days. And thanks 06black for clearing up our charge piping diameter. 3.5" seemed way too large, but I wasn't quite sure which method to be using to determine ideal diameter sizing.
nope...sorry
area was commenting on a point that was already clarified, but since he wasnt specific in his post, I thought he was referring to a different error, which is why i got frustrated. thanks tho
06-20-2009, 04:42 PM
#121
back to back pulls 108 and 109
from 95 and 96 respectivly
we pulled 5 degrees just to be safe and the car isnt running meth yet but it looks promising
need smaller pulley, only makes 15psi
from 95 and 96 respectivly
we pulled 5 degrees just to be safe and the car isnt running meth yet but it looks promising
need smaller pulley, only makes 15psi
Last edited by freakta; 06-20-2009 at 05:16 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
