Hot engine but only 65* day, but decent #'s.
Video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e_ogUJqU6mk

Here is the dyno chart. Notice I gained on the second pass but the 3rd dropped due to engine heat.

 

Very nice sir....fast car!

 

seems to me like you should be putting down more with your mods than you did...especially on a dyno jet

 

Your torque still seems a little low to me but every dyno reads different so IDK. Still think you need someone to tweak your tune. I put down the same numbers as you and I dont have all those boltons I still had the stock airfilter in. You should be in the 320 whp and 350-360 wtrq. range with those mods.

 

nice #'s! props dude

 

next up, TC swap rite?

 

your numbers look a lil low for all those mods, sure you maxed the flow on the turbo out?

 

nice numbers deff my fav tc

 

Favorite TC huh? Eboner! LOL I'm sure it's not the most aggressive tune but those are decent #'s for my DD car.* Everyone keeps saying "with your mods" I should be making more.* IMO my IC and charge piping are not really going to garner a big gain on a 10 second dyno pull with my stock turbo.* My intake; DP and exhaust WILL.* I'm pretty confident if I took my car to the road course though I'd easily pull away over time vs everyone else that is getting the same #'s with a stock car or with a couple bolt ons(because of my cooling mods).* Maybe I'll see if some more can be safely pulled out with some tuning tweaks but I'm pretty happy.

 

yea but any whiet balt with the ss bodykit is sex

 

I just noticed you spelled your own name wrong in the title.

 

yeah but with that ic, charge piping, intake, and then the exhaust. you could be running more boost and be able to put down some very nice numbers. but yes, since it is a DD tune, thats pretty good.

 

HA** Fixed!* Thanks bro.

 

everybody in the last post said, 266 whp on a mustang dyno is not 305 on a dynojet


yeah right

nice numbers and right on to what hahn did uncorrected in prob colder temps,

sae corrected dyno sheet on cobaltss.net

wow what a concept!

there are more than a few tuners on this site only putting down these numbers uncorrected with mods

 

^^^ I don't think I'd realized so many were uncorrected.* So I guess the naysayers can suck a nut.* **I specifically wanted it corrected. The owner there told me that the industry standard is 5% smoothing and corrected #'s. It was 90* in the bay and a 20 minute drive to them. Only had about a 5 min cool down.* It's all good.* I could have shown 350WHP and 420WTQ and there would still be people finding excuses to talk ****.* I'm open to it though so it's all good.* I **** on people all the time so I can take it**

 

Can you post the dyno sheet or atleast post the #'s here, I can't see them at work.

 

the highest numbers can be pulled from 192+ degree's. not cold. hate to say it, but if the graph was smooth like it should be, you would have lost "indicated" power

 

that's right naysayers can suck a nut!

i called 266 wheel on a the stang dyno was 305 and nobody believed me, its about 15% lower, believe me i used to tune my ls1 on a stang dyno and it ALWAYS read low. but dynos are only tuning devices, the track will tell based on mph(et means squat in fwd world due to traction issues)

and yes corrected numbers are the norm outside of this forum. for good reason, its the only way to truely compare numbers mod for mod and tune for tune.

go to another forum and try and post your uncorrected numbers and see how that is recieved!

you are right on with hahn numbers, uncorrected you would prob be 320+ just like him.

 

Hey man numbers look good keep up the good work!!

 

i was going to go with hahns stuff but if i get numbers that low i don't think i will... :-?
do you have the maxflow down pipe and the intercooler? and the chargepiping? i wonder how much difference those would make. i didn't see em in your list of mods i don't think

 

wow multiple posts by sukxost and no mention of the word rice!

 

thats because he is a respected member on this forum and always have something knowledgable to say. Good job sir. I'm sure with a more aggresive tune you will show higher numbers. I told Trifecta to give me the most aggressive tune and now I am clutch slipping like a biotch lol. Time for a new clutch for me lol

 

the peak numbers are being read off a bump in the graph. not an overall average of peak power. much like people spiking the boost to 25 psi and it dropping back down. sorry, just an annoyance of mine

 

what are your numbers? me not want a slippy clitch lol... from what i've read the clutch will start to slip around 330ish...

 

[QUOTE=kling1022;3397353]thats because he is a respected member on this forum and always have something knowledgable to say. Good job sir. I'm sure with a more aggresive tune you will show higher numbers.

Remind me never to talk **** to you! LOL Thanks man. Either way...Hahn's uncorrected #'s of 322/361 were advertised as under optimal conditions and my #'s of corrected relate to what they got.

I had an epiphany on the way home from the meet tonight......I asked the guy to make sure he turned the ESC off before the pulls(I filmed and he "drove"). He said he hit the button once. Not thinking...that just turns off the ESC. You have to hit it again to turn on the "competitive mode". Would that have made any difference in numbers up or down?

LOL* Mine does that.* Spikes to about 25 and drops to 20....then maybe climbs to 21.* I upgraded my BOV spring so it could close and open better under higher boost and it's still like that.* I'm not sure if that's due to tuning or the spring or both.** I'd kinda rather have a steady 22 or 23.....but it's nice to see it hit 25 though.** LOL