been small talk about a couple changes to the SS/TC sedan coming out for the couple months it is?

anything more on this?

apparently there will be no ss sedan for 2010

Yea, its deleted and no longer made...:lol:

oh. lol

i could of swore there was some changes. lol

Sorry man I was the one that posted the badnews

no 2010 Cobalt SS/TC Sedan

Few changes for the Coupe... Std Sunroof etc...

Sorry man I was the one that posted the badnews

no 2010 Cobalt SS/TC Sedan

Few changes for the Coupe... Std Sunroof etc...

Why a standard sunroof ... gheyyyy ... I wanted mine without it, but I couldn't find my exact combo without ordering one and not getting a good deal like I did bc they were sitting on dealer lots for such a long time

That sucks they are getting rid of the SS/TC sedan! I am not to big on the sunroof as a standard. I think the should just make the "stg kit" standard if it ever comes out.

yeah stage kit standard but like 3K more....


gm....

Should have made G85 limited slip standard instead of the roof.

Should have made G85 limited slip standard instead of the roof.

Agreed! or even better "stg kit" and G85.

u and the damn stage kit. lol

well atleast they are keeping the cobalt SS around

LSD and stage kit standard wouldve been fantastic. but i have lsd and will soon have the stage kit anyways, so whatever. sucks about the end of the line for the sedan tho :(

maybe the SS sedan will be worth something in the future......

This is what you guys who don't want a sunroof plan on doing in your car isn't it......

http://www.break.com/usercontent/2009/5/sunroof-fail-717209.html

This is what you guys who don't want a sunroof plan on doing in your car isn't it......

http://www.break.com/usercontent/2009/5/sunroof-fail-717209.html

:lol: at least with the cobalt's sunroof you can leave the sliding panel closed with the sunroof open!

This is what you guys who don't want a sunroof plan on doing in your car isn't it......

http://www.break.com/usercontent/2009/5/sunroof-fail-717209.html

:lol: I didn't the sunroof cause the seal will eventually go and start to leak.

:lol: at least with the cobalt's sunroof you can leave the sliding panel closed with the sunroof open!

Oh yeah that does alot of good. :lol:

I thought you would relate to that video LOL! I know what you guys are thinking......

Nothing GM has made in the last 3-5 years will be worth anything from GM in the future.....

They are also dropping the Cobalt SS coupe as well as the HHR SS.

Nothing GM has made in the last 3-5 years will be worth anything from GM in the future.....

Not many cars made in today's world will be worth anything, with the exception of the VERY high end cars. But you know thats what they said about all the muscle cars back in the day that sell for over 100k now. The only thing that will be worth something from GM from the last 3-5 years will be the ZR1. You can't forget about that.

One thing you got to look at is: are the cars of today masproduced? YES, but so are our people. When those cars came out so long ago what were the ratio of people per car to what it is today. That will tell you what the future for value of cars will be. In 1960 there were 179,323,175 people in the US and 74,000,000 registered cars. Now there is 306,380,000 people roughly 231,000,000 registered cars. The us population will increase every ten years by a MINIMUM of 10% and I mean MINIMUM. Someone else can figure the car to people ratio, because I was informed by someone on here I type to much:lol:

http://jalopnik.com/5246047/gm-axes-...important-ones

:thumbsdow::bye:

http://jalopnik.com/5246047/gm-axes-...important-ones

:thumbsdow::bye:

We all pretty much saw that coming for a few months now.

Interesting, so I bought the last of an econobox-pocket rocket breed...It's no Camaro, but at least it'll hold some sentimental value. My 05 SS/SC was one of the funnest cars I've owned, I'm sure this one will be no different.

Interesting, so I bought the last of an econobox-pocket rocket breed...It's no Camaro, but at least it'll hold some sentimental value. My 05 SS/SC was one of the funnest cars I've owned, I'm sure this one will be no different.

That's about all the value we expect to hold out of these cars! :lol:

PS - welcome to the family, did you buy sedan or coupe?

That's about all the value we expect to hold out of these cars! :lol:

PS - welcome to the family, did you buy sedan or coupe?

LOL very true. I heard an interesting statistic the other day, whether or not it's true I don't know, but they said 90% of the tangible things we people buy are on average 15 years away from the scrap field haha.

Thanks again, I bought a switchblade (or whatever the color is called) silver sedan. :)

After taking a ride in Venom's sedan on the weekend it's sad to see it go. It gives you the convenience of a 4 door with the performance of the coupe, and after 3 hours in the seats one way the back isn't terribly uncomfortable, at least my ass was still awake when we got back here and we didn't have to keep folding the passenger seat down and forward :).

LOL very true. I heard an interesting statistic the other day, whether or not it's true I don't know, but they said 90% of the tangible things we people buy are on average 15 years away from the scrap field haha.

Thanks again, I bought a switchblade (or whatever the color is called) silver sedan. :)

Interesting thing to know. Sadly though, it doesn't surprise me! :thumbsdow

Nice, post pics when you can, I haven't seen many sedans posted on here.

I still want to see the pics of the one member who has the rally yellow sedan. I'm curious to see what it looks like!

well i was going to post this link but i ran into this post but here it is

http://blogs.thecarconnection.com/marty-blog/1015644_2010-chevrolet-cobalt-spied

well i was going to post this link but i ran into this post but here it is

http://blogs.thecarconnection.com/marty-blog/1015644_2010-chevrolet-cobalt-spied

Thats the chevy cruze you fail eric

Thats the chevy cruze you fail eric

o shit my bad hey i havent been around for like a year on this site i just got back on my feet about a month ago so i didn't know

o shit my bad hey i havent been around for like a year on this site i just got back on my feet about a month ago so i didn't know

Am messing with you foo :lol:

Am messing with you foo :lol:

so then wut is it the cruize or the balt...(just got done with sleepin my cry baby so im kinda lost here)

Its the cruze

2010 SS Sedan Deleted... my wife is upset

I dont know why you guys are all shocked....HPVO was put on indefinite hiatus, GM is closing plants for as many as 13weeks this summer, and the entire Cobalt product line is dead after the 2010 model year, wasnt a big stretch to come up with this. I just hope they put the LNF in a base Camaro.

I dont know why you guys are all shocked....HPVO was put on indefinite hiatus, GM is closing plants for as many as 13weeks this summer, and the entire Cobalt product line is dead after the 2010 model year, wasnt a big stretch to come up with this. I just hope they put the LNF in a base Camaro.

I hope this aswell, but you know aswell as I do that it will never happen because it makes to much since for them to do it.

putting the LNF in the new camaro would be retarded. the lnf only able to get 31-32 mpg's in a car that weighs 2900lbs, so u want to add an extra 1000lb's to the engine, the mpg's would take a shit. gm already stated that they canned that idea that it wasn't worth the investment. mpg's suffered to much thats why theyr'e keeping the 3.6DI engine.

n e ways, it's sad to see the cobalt go. it was short lived. I enjoyed mine when i had it. maybe i'll get the new T/C if i can find one locally for cheap.

putting the LNF in the new camaro would be retarded. the lnf only able to get 31-32 mpg's in a car that weighs 2900lbs, so u want to add an extra 1000lb's to the engine, the mpg's would take a shit. gm already stated that they canned that idea that it wasn't worth the investment. mpg's suffered to much thats why theyr'e keeping the 3.6DI engine.

n e ways, it's sad to see the cobalt go. it was short lived. I enjoyed mine when i had it. maybe i'll get the new T/C if i can find one locally for cheap.

I dont think the mileage would suffer anywhere near as much as you do. Camaro doesnt weigh 1000lbs more either.

Where did you see they said it wasnt worth the investment? I saw that people freaked at the idea, so they just stuck with the LLT, I never saw that the LNF got worse fuel economy, nor that it wasnt worth the investment.

putting the LNF in the new camaro would be retarded. the lnf only able to get 31-32 mpg's in a car that weighs 2900lbs, so u want to add an extra 1000lb's to the engine, the mpg's would take a shit. gm already stated that they canned that idea that it wasn't worth the investment. mpg's suffered to much thats why theyr'e keeping the 3.6DI engine.

n e ways, it's sad to see the cobalt go. it was short lived. I enjoyed mine when i had it. maybe i'll get the new T/C if i can find one locally for cheap.

IF(and I mean if) it ever happened I don't think it would be the 260hp/tq version of the LNF but the 300hp & 300+tq "stg kit" LNF witch I think would be lighter and out perform the V6 engine option. At higher HP/TQ levels this engine can still make stock or better MPG numbers. So IMO it would not be "retarded".

I dont think the mileage would suffer anywhere near as much as you do. Camaro doesnt weigh 1000lbs more either.

Where did you see they said it wasnt worth the investment? I saw that people freaked at the idea, so they just stuck with the LLT, I never saw that the LNF got worse fuel economy, nor that it wasnt worth the investment.

umm cobalt ss 2900ish lbs, camaro 2800ish lbs, off by 100lbs, nearly 1000lbs difference. it was posted on GMI, one of the big wigs that worked on the camaro already stated that the idea was scraped cuz there was no plus side in doing it. it didnt achieve any better fuel economy. i read it several months ago if not late last year. it was a thread specifically about the LNF in the new camaro.

umm cobalt ss 2900ish lbs, camaro 2800ish lbs, off by 100lbs, nearly 1000lbs difference. it was posted on GMI, one of the big wigs that worked on the camaro already stated that the idea was scraped cuz there was no plus side in doing it. it didnt achieve any better fuel economy. i read it several months ago if not late last year. it was a thread specifically about the LNF in the new camaro.

I believe you meant 3900lbs and that is for the fully loaded SS model from what I have seen. I would bet a LNF model would be around 3500lbs. If they put the LNF in stock 260hp/tq form you are correct there would be no benefit what so ever. I don't think anyone is counting on this happening, but it is nice to ponder upon the thought.

umm cobalt ss 2900ish lbs, camaro 2800ish lbs, off by 100lbs, nearly 1000lbs difference. it was posted on GMI, one of the big wigs that worked on the camaro already stated that the idea was scraped cuz there was no plus side in doing it. it didnt achieve any better fuel economy. i read it several months ago if not late last year. it was a thread specifically about the LNF in the new camaro.

I remember reading it was canned because too many of the camaro owners where thinking back to the early 80's when they did have really iron duke 4cyl (90hp or something like that)...They didnt want to start with that image. But 300hp is 300hp...And having a turbo vs na your going to have more potential w/ the LNF

I believe you meant 3900lbs and that is for the fully loaded SS model from what I have seen. I would bet a LNF model would be around 3500lbs. If they put the LNF in stock 260hp/tq form you are correct there would be no benefit what so ever. I don't think anyone is counting on this happening, but it is nice to ponder upon the thought.

3863 lbs, something like that it doesnt reach 3900lbs, for the loaded SS. just under 3800 for the V6. like 10lbs under or something like that. i cant see the LNF weighing 3500lbs, 3700 ish yes. not 3500, unless theres some serious weight reduction. i'm a lil upset over the weight of the car. but after seing pics of one rear ended, and the rear of the car completly smashed and driver came out without a scratch, i'm ok with it now. lol, rather be safe then dead.

Interesting thing to know. Sadly though, it doesn't surprise me! :thumbsdow

Nice, post pics when you can, I haven't seen many sedans posted on here.

I still want to see the pics of the one member who has the rally yellow sedan. I'm curious to see what it looks like!


Did somebody say rally yellow sedan?!
http://www.cobaltss.net/forums/showthread.php?t=168090
http://www.cobaltss.net/forums/showthread.php?t=169258

putting the LNF in the new camaro would be retarded. the lnf only able to get 31-32 mpg's in a car that weighs 2900lbs, so u want to add an extra 1000lb's to the engine, the mpg's would take a shit. gm already stated that they canned that idea that it wasn't worth the investment. mpg's suffered to much thats why theyr'e keeping the 3.6DI engine.

n e ways, it's sad to see the cobalt go. it was short lived. I enjoyed mine when i had it. maybe i'll get the new T/C if i can find one locally for cheap.

i know engineer in chevy and im not saying names, but its been done they just dont know if its going to be preduction, and the camaro doesnt weigh 3900lbs or near that its more like 3000-3400lbs, gas mileage was about the same as the v6rs, plus boost is more fun to drive

I believe you meant 3900lbs and that is for the fully loaded SS model from what I have seen. I would bet a LNF model would be around 3500lbs. If they put the LNF in stock 260hp/tq form you are correct there would be no benefit what so ever. I don't think anyone is counting on this happening, but it is nice to ponder upon the thought.


You have NO clue as to wtf you're talking about. There were LNF camaro's rolling around Milford and they were NOT getting any better fuel mileage over the 3.6L V6. There is no big conspiracy. It didn't make sense to put the LNF in the Camaro for a great many reasons. Stop guessing...



i know engineer in chevy and im not saying names, but its been done they just dont know if its going to be preduction, and the camaro doesnt weigh 3900lbs or near that its more like 3000-3400lbs, gas mileage was about the same as the v6rs, plus boost is more fun to drive

Alright, the Camaro LS and LT come in around 3800 lbs, whereas the SS Camaro comes in at nearly 4000 lbs...

And please, why in the FUCK would GM lie about the curb weight? I'm looking forward to your detailed insider knowledge on this one... :lol:

You have NO clue as to wtf you're talking about. There were LNF camaro's rolling around Milford and they were NOT getting any better fuel mileage over the 3.6L V6. There is no big conspiracy. It didn't make sense to put the LNF in the Camaro for a great many reasons. Stop guessing...

Thats funny. I think some things are hard for you to comprehend.

Did somebody say rally yellow sedan?!
http://www.cobaltss.net/forums/showthread.php?t=168090
http://www.cobaltss.net/forums/showthread.php?t=169258

:lol: I did!!!! I've been dying to see one!

Finally! I can die in rest!

Alright, the Camaro LS and LT come in around 3800 lbs, whereas the SS Camaro comes in at nearly 4000 lbs...

No kidding. I'm sure GM (and Camaro fans) would be thrilled if the Camaro weighed 3000 pounds. The Mustang - the real "lightweight" of the V8 pony car field weighs 3,572. The V6 Genesis weighs 3,389 or so.

Camaro LS: 3780

Camaro LT: 3728

Camaro SS: 3849

(If you're wondering why LS weighs more than the better equipped LT it's because it has steel wheels).

http://www.chevrolet.com/vehicles/2010/camaro/features.do

No kidding. I'm sure GM (and Camaro fans) would be thrilled if the Camaro weighed 3000 pounds. The Mustang - the real "lightweight" of the V8 pony car field weighs 3,572. The V6 Genesis weighs 3,389 or so.

Camaro LS: 3780

Camaro LT: 3728

Camaro SS: 3849

(If you're wondering why LS weighs more than the better equipped LT it's because it has steel wheels).

http://www.chevrolet.com/vehicles/2010/camaro/features.do

I think you may have transposed numbers.....and if you didnt, theres no f'n way the reason the LT is lighter is because of the wheels on the LS....do you REALLY think that the steel wheels on the LS weight 13lbs a piece more than the alloys? LMFAO.

:lol: I did!!!! I've been dying to see one!

Finally! I can die in rest!

He's just the recent twin ;)

http://i140.photobucket.com/albums/r23/grometsc/Cobalt%20SS/car.jpg

Plan on getting some new photos when I finally clean it up some more and finish a few changes I wanted done

But TC Sedans Rule!

Interesting thing to know. Sadly though, it doesn't surprise me! :thumbsdow

Nice, post pics when you can, I haven't seen many sedans posted on here.

I still want to see the pics of the one member who has the rally yellow sedan. I'm curious to see what it looks like!

http://www.ozmodius.com/tweety.jpg

BLACK OUT THE RIMS!.

think it would look nice!

Hey can someone please tell me cuz I'm a little confused about the Cobalt SS MY2010 situation. So is GM still gonna sell the Cobalt SS coupe for about half the 2010 model year? Or has it been completely removed along with the sedan?

Hey can someone please tell me cuz I'm a little confused about the Cobalt SS MY2010 situation. So is GM still gonna sell the Cobalt SS coupe for about half the 2010 model year? Or has it been completely removed along with the sedan?

IIRC the cobalt SS is supposed to be produced till the end of 09's calendar year .

i went to a seminar..and i work for GM


cobalt SS built for firs quarter for sure

lots of sandard equipment that ppl like dont like
like the damn sunbroof



ok i found the list they posted for me,

standard side airbags standard
USB and XM radio
Sunroof, performance display, and limited slip all standard on the coupe



;)

Ok cool, thanks for clearing that up!
I was getting a little scared cuz I wanna get one in about 2 or so months.
I don't really mind the standard equipment, except for the sunroof. But if there's no choice then whatever.
And I'm just wondering, will the standard equipment bring the base price of the car up?

i went to a seminar..and i work for GM


cobalt SS built for firs quarter for sure

lots of sandard equipment that ppl like dont like
like the damn sunbroof



ok i found the list they posted for me,

standard side airbags standard
USB and XM radio
Sunroof, performance display, and limited slip all standard on the coupe



;)

I guess they are trying to get rid of all that cobalt ss specific equipment before they end it.

id ont have pricing quite yet....
i will post MSRPs as soon as i can
but you better believe that its gonna cost more :)
mine has all this equipment, minus sunroof, and it MSRP fir 28,505
and every year they cost more so im guessing that there isnt anything we can add except dealer installed items so my gess in CAD ( sorry ) is.......round $30,800

If you look at the MSRP on a loaded SS it's in the mid 26K range for 09's . You could possibly see a 27K msrp for 2010.

My SS/TC sedan was $200 cheaper than my SS/SC was and they both where employee pricing. I thought it was weird but I wasn't going to argue with them about it.

My SS/TC sedan was $200 cheaper than my SS/SC was and they both where employee pricing. I thought it was weird but I wasn't going to argue with them about it.

Same here , in 06 my SS/SC was almost 4K more than what i got my TC for .

not the new ones when they come out....

too much chit on em,
i hate sunroofs, maybe it makes me a lil bitter
and glad to have purchased an 09

Damn, that looks like its gonna be pretty expensive. I'm gonna see if I can find an '09 with the options that I want. If that doesn't work out, I guess I'll go with a '10

goood luck
not many around

not the new ones when they come out....

too much chit on em,
i hate sunroofs, maybe it makes me a lil bitter
and glad to have purchased an 09

How so? The only option that I didn't get and its because I couldn't get it was the RPD on my new SS/TC. On My SS/SC the only options that I got was the sunroof and the G85 package.

i didnt want a sunroof, that whistles and makes a lot of noise and cost over $1200 bucks.
my sig has the wants as i factory ordered

i didnt want a sunroof, that whistles and makes a lot of noise and cost over $1200 bucks.
my sig has the wants as i factory ordered

The sunroof is $750.

The sunroof is $750.

Canada is prolly different.

O yea I didn't even think about that, my bad. I should of looked where he was from.

yah boooo $1250 bucks.
not a good deal for a noise maker
if it was a quality roof like internally stowed id buy for sure

If it rattles take it to the dealer and they will fix it. Mine is just fine.

Well I've got a sunroof on my LT right now and it hasn't made any noise, yet. But I wonder if it would be at all possible to order one without a sunroof even if you pay for it.

no way

r u kidding me lol