2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

Heat Exchanger Question???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 6, 2009 | 04:03 PM
  #1  
SlowBalt_06's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (-1)
 
Joined: 08-01-07
Posts: 6,604
Likes: 0
From: WestCoast
Heat Exchanger Question???

i've read alot of mixed reviews bout running the stock h.e with an upgraded one..i just wanna do if theres any downside...pros and cons?
Reply
Old May 6, 2009 | 04:06 PM
  #2  
stage2cobaltss's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 02-22-07
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
From: camp lejeune, NC/wadsworth ohio
im runnin just the stocker but ive read its better to just use the upgraded one with the dual pass and option b
Reply
Old May 6, 2009 | 04:06 PM
  #3  
Snakes709's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 06-03-08
Posts: 4,383
Likes: 1
From: Edmonton
i dont know of any cons but it helps more if u run both, the stock h/e does little work but it does do something. And of course the aftermarket one does alot more
Reply
Old May 6, 2009 | 05:18 PM
  #4  
Red05SS/SC's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 04-20-07
Posts: 719
Likes: 0
From: Levittown, PA
i run the ott heat exchanger with the extra inline resevoir aka "stu" mod with the stock endplate and it seems to be working quite well. I only see IAT2's get to about mid 130's at the most even on a hot day.
Reply
Old May 6, 2009 | 05:21 PM
  #5  
SS/SCking's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-03-06
Posts: 5,747
Likes: 0
From: Buffalo, NY!!!
Originally Posted by Red05SS/SC
i run the ott heat exchanger with the extra inline resevoir aka "stu" mod with the stock endplate and it seems to be working quite well. I only see IAT2's get to about mid 130's at the most even on a hot day.
This is what I have done, and have removed the stock unit...
Reply
Old May 6, 2009 | 05:39 PM
  #6  
nicksredline's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-27-08
Posts: 1,420
Likes: 0
From: ohio
everyone has there own opinion... no 1 has done any tests yet( if i had money i would) but i would say to use both because of more coolant u can hold the more collant= more cooling... but on the second hand it could be a waist to have the second h/e ( might get no air and could cause more heat from the motor=more harm than good)
Reply
Old May 6, 2009 | 05:47 PM
  #7  
hawkeyez's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 02-04-06
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
From: Glenville
I just intalled a heat exchanger and i love it. Next will be dualpass!
Reply
Old May 6, 2009 | 05:49 PM
  #8  
SCcobaltSS's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 11-28-06
Posts: 4,085
Likes: 2
From: Phoenix
Originally Posted by nicksredline
everyone has there own opinion... no 1 has done any tests yet( if i had money i would) but i would say to use both because of more coolant u can hold the more collant= more cooling... but on the second hand it could be a waist to have the second h/e ( might get no air and could cause more heat from the motor=more harm than good)
That is an incorrect statement. You only can cool so much vs. with the cubic feet of heat exchagner. Adding more liquid to the system doesnt cool better.

This has been brought up like 800 times, everybody has a different opinion.

The stock H/E is getting air pulled from the fans at a stop, you may lose efficiency while you are stopped because it is sitting in a different spot.

I dont see why you couldnt run the stock h/e first then the after market.. Seems like it would be more efficient. But have never done it, so I dont know.
Reply
Old May 6, 2009 | 05:50 PM
  #9  
stealthy1ss's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 09-27-06
Posts: 3,485
Likes: 3
From: Road America
I have heard that if you keep your stock h/e, add an aftermarket h/e and option b, that you will be pushing your pump to the limits because it pumps based on volume.
Reply
Old May 6, 2009 | 05:54 PM
  #10  
SCcobaltSS's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 11-28-06
Posts: 4,085
Likes: 2
From: Phoenix
All pumps do that.. You dont need a option B when you get another H/E, that is when you get DP. Plus you have to check the ft. of head the pump can push out and check all lines and pressure drops from the equipment to see how much room you have to play with.
Reply
Old May 6, 2009 | 05:56 PM
  #11  
Pyros777's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 01-26-05
Posts: 3,418
Likes: 1
From: N/A
I don't think there are any significant pros or cons to running either setup as far as cooling is concerned.

More volume in the system means more work for the pump though, so you may want to consider that.

My setup will look like the following, for better or worse:

Dual-pass end plate
Opt. B
Stock h/e
OTTP h/e

These are my stats with a 100% stock cooling system (working pump):
ECT is thrown in for reference even though it is not part of the S/C cooling circuit

Starup
ECT: 115
IAT: 88
IAT2: 88

Light cruising
ECT: 180
IAT: 91
IAT2: 113

First 1st-->2nd-->3rd Pull
ECT: 183
IAT: 90
IAT2: 129

Second 1st-->2nd-->3rd Pull
ECT: 183
IAT: 90
IAT2: 142

Third 1st-->2nd-->3rd Pull
ECT: 183
IAT: 91
IAT2: 142

(All pulls were within a 20 min time frame)

Would anyone with just a heat exchanger mind posting similar stats?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DarrenGC
2.2L L61 Performance Tech
18
Dec 24, 2021 01:55 PM
brandon04
Problems/Service/Maintenance
46
Oct 21, 2015 07:04 AM
n20saturn
Parts
7
Sep 30, 2015 12:26 AM
Extremespeed
South Pacific
0
Sep 29, 2015 04:34 AM
jmelton327
Drivetrain
2
Sep 26, 2015 10:04 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:45 PM.