2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

stg2 dyno sheet!!!! and stock 06 si

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 21, 2006 | 07:52 PM
  #1  
stg2cobalt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-29-06
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
From: charlotte, nc
stg2 dyno sheet!!!! and stock 06 si

ok i went to the dyno today and this are my numbers before and after the stg 2

i also took my fiance's si i was expecting around 170hp

see how big of a difference between both cars

what you all think?
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2006 | 08:20 PM
  #2  
joeworkstoohard's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-21-06
Posts: 5,577
Likes: 3
From: Gainesville, FL
i gotta say, i'm impressed with the Si if i'm reading that right, it's a much smoother power build than hondas i'm used to.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2006 | 08:25 PM
  #3  
Ljavy17's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-01-05
Posts: 3,622
Likes: 0
From: Miami
not bad at all. im starting to think a gm stg 2 will not put down more than 240whp.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2006 | 08:30 PM
  #4  
CobaltSS313's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-03-05
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
so you gained 11hp by buying the stage 2 kit?
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2006 | 08:34 PM
  #5  
astrocrep's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-14-05
Posts: 918
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
WTF???

Whats wrong with your torque curve?????

-Rich
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2006 | 08:36 PM
  #6  
distillion's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-11-05
Posts: 6,298
Likes: 1
From: mississauga
i dont belive that dyno for a second.....
things look too suspecious for my liking
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2006 | 08:37 PM
  #7  
p7x's Avatar
p7x
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-15-05
Posts: 5,126
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa
Originally Posted by Ljavy17
not bad at all. im starting to think a gm stg 2 will not put down more than 240whp.
GM tune.......noticed this along time ago when guys that dynoed at 230 stock thought they were going to get 260 out of stage 2.

S2 + 2.8 + our savior HPT I should be looking @ 260
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2006 | 08:38 PM
  #8  
distillion's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-11-05
Posts: 6,298
Likes: 1
From: mississauga
ya but look at the torque, something isnt right....
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2006 | 08:56 PM
  #9  
p7x's Avatar
p7x
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-15-05
Posts: 5,126
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa
tru that torque curve is all f-ed up
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2006 | 08:57 PM
  #10  
bravehart929's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 06-04-06
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
From: cinti,oh
on most dyno charts the horsepower and torque curves meet at like 5250 rpms or something like that
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2006 | 09:55 PM
  #11  
ballerSS's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 10-07-05
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Originally Posted by bravehart929
on most dyno charts the horsepower and torque curves meet at like 5250 rpms or something like that
You are correct, horsepower ALWAYS equals torque at 5252, it's just part of the formula.

Something is way off with that dyno!
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2006 | 09:59 PM
  #12  
CobaltSS?'s Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 08-19-06
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte"Queen City"
is the si stock?
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2006 | 10:02 PM
  #13  
Jekyl's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-12-05
Posts: 910
Likes: 0
From: Calgary Alberta
Thats Not A Torque Curve Its An Air Fuel Ratio!!!!!!
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2006 | 10:03 PM
  #14  
sethallen's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-25-05
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 1
From: Detroit MI to San Diego
are you guys looking at the AF readings, and thinking they are his torque readings?? You know that the top two lines are hp and tq right? just makin sure no ones flamin him for no reason
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2006 | 10:03 PM
  #15  
Jekyl's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-12-05
Posts: 910
Likes: 0
From: Calgary Alberta
wow you guys are so quick to jump to conclusions....

common sense and experience tells me that in the first graph, that is his air fuel ratio and not his torque curve.

You guys are nubs.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2006 | 10:04 PM
  #16  
Jekyl's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-12-05
Posts: 910
Likes: 0
From: Calgary Alberta
Originally Posted by sethallen
are you guys looking at the AF readings, and thinking they are his torque readings?? You know that the top two lines are hp and tq right? just makin sure no ones flamin him for no reason

Wrong.

Top two lines are Before and After HP curves.

Bottom two lines are before and after Air Fuel Ratio curves.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2006 | 10:05 PM
  #17  
CobaltSS313's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-03-05
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
no the red one is his first run and the blue one is his second,or vice versa, since when did dynos not show torque that sucks. If im not seeing what everyone else is seeing just let me know but i dont see one.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2006 | 10:06 PM
  #18  
D4u2s0t's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 12-18-05
Posts: 17,838
Likes: 1
From: North Jersey
Originally Posted by sethallen
are you guys looking at the AF readings, and thinking they are his torque readings?? You know that the top two lines are hp and tq right? just makin sure no ones flamin him for no reason

deleted my post because i'm an idiot...


**hides his head in shame**
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2006 | 10:08 PM
  #19  
Jekyl's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-12-05
Posts: 910
Likes: 0
From: Calgary Alberta
Originally Posted by D4u2s0t
deleted my post because i'm an idiot...


**hides his head in shame**


Too late, I read your original posts......


hehehehe
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2006 | 10:09 PM
  #20  
kanabrewski's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 07-10-06
Posts: 336
Likes: 1
From: Charlotte, NC
he didn't get the torque printed that's all. printed two hp runs and two a/f runs. 4th gear runs.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2006 | 10:46 PM
  #21  
NightmareRacing's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 04-23-06
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
From: WA
lol, now THAT was funny... let me see (turning over a rock)..OH! here you guys are, hi! how yall doin?

lol

hey looks like hte stock tune is kinda lean at 4500...
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2006 | 08:42 AM
  #22  
forced_induction's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-22-06
Posts: 1,601
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
Originally Posted by stg2cobalt
ok i went to the dyno today and this are my numbers before and after the stg 2

i also took my fiance's si i was expecting around 170hp

see how big of a difference between both cars

what you all think?

So wait you got 227whp stock!?!?!?! I have heard people claim 234whp on ************* with no proof so thought it was bs. Thats pretty impressive, under rated almost 25whp
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2006 | 09:18 AM
  #23  
Wo|F's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 06-30-06
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
From: Sherbrooke, Qc, Canada
227 Whp = about 260 crank hp, so a lot more than 25 hp underrated...
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2006 | 09:44 PM
  #24  
stg2cobalt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-29-06
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
From: charlotte, nc
Originally Posted by distillion
ya but look at the torque, something isnt right....
that is not the torque
is just the af little more attention please lol
the second sheet shows you the torque

comprende plain english
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2006 | 09:50 PM
  #25  
stg2cobalt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-29-06
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
From: charlotte, nc
Originally Posted by CobaltSS?
is the si stock?
read the title
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:37 PM.