some guys said to me the 2.2 it's better them 2.4 ecotec, i'm not sur, what do you think???? thx for your ansers

 

Go to GM and check out the specs and you decide

 

To me it seems that the guy doesn't know what he's talking about.

But then again, what does he mean when he says "better"?

 

I have been in a rental 2.2 for the last 3 weeks.

Kills

Mazda 6
F150
V6 accord w/ the Triangle lights
04 Civic w/ Vtec
V6 Stang
and probably a few others I cant remember.

Losses

89 ZC Integra w/ all bolt ons.

Very impressive car, much faster then my 2.4 SE-R was.

I think the 2.4 Cobalt would be faster though.

Cant beat displacement

 

If you ask me I prefer 4 wheel disc brakes,sport tuned suspension,vvti,forged rods, better displacement did I forget anything??

 

nope you got everything

 

if you ask me you cant tell the difference! except in your bankaccount

 

my gf just bought a 2.4 cobalt ss, that lil sucker moves, gonna get rid of that garbage gas the dealer filled it with and throw in atleast 91 and hammer it again, ive also driven the 2.2 and it wasnt nearly as responsive.

 

press the gas peddle all the way down.

 

i agree, i would have gotten the ss na solely for the 4 wheel discs. if you look at times in the 1320, it seems almost to be a drivers race..... stock 2.2s are running mid-high 15s in some (rare) cases, and the 2.4s are mid 15s. with exhaust and intake and a decent driver, the 2.4 should be owned by a 2.2.

 

 

my gf will be dynoing her ss on the 21st, bone stock, a buddy of mine with G5 GT will be there too dynoing his car with intake, exhaust, 2.2's make about 125 130 ish at the wheels, i cant recall what a 2.4 makes, but more than that forsure, we will see wat a bone stock car does and a mildly modded one does.

 

And once my cams are on next week Ill be dynoing

 

Yea, sick rims and a better body kit :P

 

Uhhh, my car stock is running a 15.20 -15.30 times. I haven't seen a stock 2.2L do that.

With an intake, it went to 15.05.

 

nice sig what are your 1/4 times on the jet ski

 

is this a real thread, or was the starter being stupid...

 

I can kill anyone from 0-32MPH, then I start to top out

 

Im not sure about manuals but my friend has a 2.4 auto and my stock 2.2 auto was a little faster, im not sure why, now that i have some mods i can say for sure that its faster than his 2.4 stock. I bet the manuals are a different story. Very interesting

 

Maybe with a turbo the 2.2 will be faster then the 2.4.
The 2.4 is a better engine. Please feel free to learn for yourself:
http://www.gmtunertour.com/index.asp...C31FDC66CC75C1

 

Im gonna have to raise a bs flag on that. I find it extremely hard to believe that the 2.2 beat a 2.4, stock for stock. Either your friend was trying to make you feel special or he cant drive his car properly.

 

I drive a 2.4L Auto Cobalt SS Coupe and it is better than the 2.2. I know this because I raced one stock for stock @ the track. 3,200 ft. elevation and won. My best time of the night ( first 5 passes ever ) was a 16.5 @ 82 mph. Its not what you would see in the magazines, but It was sure a hell of a time!

 

nothing to driving an auto lol so he must just not have had the pedal to the metal

 

me and my friend raced at the track my 2.4 auto vs. his 2.2 auto with in intake, see my sig for mods , i ran a 15.8 while he ran a 16.4...

 

I took my friends redline off the line got about half a car length on him and then I went deaf from the supercharger and he flew by me lol. I've drvien my moms 2.2auto and theres no comparision to me. Also I raced my friends cavy with the 2.2 ecotec+intake and exhaust and I beat him.