Pictures & Videos Your pictures, photoshops, and videos.

SpecV--VS--2.4ss?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 23, 2006 | 01:59 PM
  #1  
an0malous's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-28-06
Posts: 12,577
Likes: 2
From: Canada
SpecV--VS--2.4ss?

http://videos.streetfire.net/recentv...9f01532661.htm

found this on SF.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2006 | 05:12 PM
  #2  
mbnoes's Avatar
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 12-15-06
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
From: Cocoa, FL
Kind surprised by this. Did he have any additional things done to the SpecV?
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2006 | 05:32 PM
  #3  
CobaltSS422's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-16-05
Posts: 1,356
Likes: 0
From: Buffalo, NY
i'm sure that spec-v was turbo'd
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2006 | 05:43 PM
  #4  
Brandon97Z's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 04-13-04
Posts: 3,394
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
Sounded like the car they were in is what was turbo. Must of been a stock or mildly modded 2.4 vs decently modded spec v. I put 2-3 cars on them by the end of the 1/8th with same mods.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2006 | 07:06 PM
  #5  
CobaltSS422's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-16-05
Posts: 1,356
Likes: 0
From: Buffalo, NY
Originally Posted by Brandon97Z
Sounded like the car they were in is what was turbo. Must of been a stock or mildly modded 2.4 vs decently modded spec v. I put 2-3 cars on them by the end of the 1/8th with same mods.

yea i think your right about the car doing the taping.. but for a spec v to put a lead on by that much that person must have had a decent mod list
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2006 | 07:27 PM
  #6  
biohazard's Avatar
Get low
 
Joined: 03-29-06
Posts: 3,476
Likes: 0
From: Crystal lake, IL
carr doing the taping sounded like a subi
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2006 | 07:31 PM
  #7  
articzap's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 01-28-06
Posts: 890
Likes: 0
From: Depew, NY
auto2.4 most likely. wow slow
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2006 | 07:31 PM
  #8  
slvrcobaltscss's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 09-16-06
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
From: Lehigh Valley, PA
that spec-v wasn't necessarily modded too much...i hate to admit it, but a friend of mine has a spec-v and it keeps close behind with my ss/sc....so if he can somewhat run with the sc then he would def put a lead on a 2.4
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2006 | 07:32 PM
  #9  
slvrcobaltscss's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 09-16-06
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
From: Lehigh Valley, PA
forgot to mention his is bone stock...sorry
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2006 | 12:34 AM
  #10  
IonNinja's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-29-05
Posts: 7,915
Likes: 0
From: AZ
what the hell kind of race was that

based on the fart can alone on that spec v I refuse to believe it was heavily modified
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2006 | 01:17 AM
  #11  
avro206's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-17-04
Posts: 2,994
Likes: 0
From: Calgary Alberta Canada
Guy at work has a SPec V---with exhaust and computer tune---I ahve the SRI (and waster of money, does nothign tune) We raced half dozen times---0.1-0.2 faster for me and 1.5mph.

We have much more high rpm pull.
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2006 | 01:28 AM
  #12  
SpoiledAlice's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-24-06
Posts: 1,333
Likes: 0
From: Kingwood, TX
i like the comments they left on SF site, i see there SS/SC fans :
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2006 | 02:27 AM
  #13  
dodracer50's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 08-26-06
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: Pearland, TX
Originally Posted by slvrcobaltscss
that spec-v wasn't necessarily modded too much...i hate to admit it, but a friend of mine has a spec-v and it keeps close behind with my ss/sc....so if he can somewhat run with the sc then he would def put a lead on a 2.4
I gotta agree as an ex spec v owner i ran 15.2's all day off intake and catback
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2006 | 03:10 AM
  #14  
Brandon97Z's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 04-13-04
Posts: 3,394
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
Originally Posted by dodracer50
I gotta agree as an ex spec v owner i ran 15.2's all day off intake and catback
They are still slower then the 2.4's. Not by much but they still are a little behind. A guy at the track said they were a heavy little car. whats the weight of the spec v?
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2006 | 03:14 AM
  #15  
dodracer50's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 08-26-06
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: Pearland, TX
they weigh about 2750lbs and run 15.4's stock
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2006 | 10:44 AM
  #16  
chevytech's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 04-15-06
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
From: mass.
a spec v is a faster car stock than a stock ss 2.4 but if you look closer at the vid the cobalt looks like a 4 door? is it? not that it rly matter since the spec v is also. but it might explain that beating a lil better to someone who might think its a coupe
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2006 | 11:07 AM
  #17  
BLKblurr06's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-16-06
Posts: 1,104
Likes: 0
From: Reynoldsburg, Ohio
not sure who should really win, but I am sure of the fact that having a limited slip, close raito 6 speed and 2-3 mor hp&tq makes the spec-V a worthy opponent for a base SS. If I were forced to place a wager on a stock vs. stock race with perfect driving, I'd have to put money on the Nissan.
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2006 | 11:11 AM
  #18  
BLKblurr06's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-16-06
Posts: 1,104
Likes: 0
From: Reynoldsburg, Ohio
oh and their top speed is north of 135mph
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2006 | 11:32 AM
  #19  
monkeiboy's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-30-06
Posts: 3,505
Likes: 0
From: West Memphis, AR
I drive a 2.4 auto and I've jumped off a start about three times faster than than.
You have to start in Low gear and shift up to I when the low gear tops out in second. I'm surpised that he didn't pull faster at the higher gears. It would be nice to see what the speedo on the chase car was saying, but I'm sure one of the geeks here can figure out their speeds the measuring the times it takes for the cars to cross the yellow median strips with a mathmatical formula. That's not my bag baby
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:07 PM.