<img src="http://cobaltss.net/articles/06_2_4ss.jpg" align="left" border="0" hspace="5" vspace="5">After work today I headed over to GSL Chev to check out there extensive Cobalt inventory. They have more 05's then anyone in the city and to my surprise several 06 2.4L SS coupes! Black, red and silver. All but one were automatics and all had the sunroof.

Saleman was very knowledgabel and after some talk we went for a test drive.

I have driven 2 base models before so have some familarity with the Cobalt. Or so I had thought....but the SS feels so much different. I can't pin it down but something felt different about the clutch and shifter----I was much smoother with the car and it all felt natural.

The car has a great ride and handling combination. Went over a few bumps and the chassis is stiff beyond belief.

As for power well I didn't get on it too much but the midrange felt impressive. Even shifting low and less then full throttle the car felt quick and strong. You just know there is more power in reserve here.

The exhaust noise was very noticeable and auidable too. But not in annoying ricer way. Engine sounded good too.

Seats are different then the base Coblat and were very comfortable.

My only complaints are the lack of white faced guages and sea of plastic under the hood. Nothing to look at there! Guess the tail pipe would do :lol: Oh and silver rims would have been okay but the wheels aren't bad by any stretch.

In summary this car is great! A nice step between the 2.2L and the 2.0L S/C.
No guaddy winfg or oversized 17" rims. Car is a great value. I have seen loaded LS coupes that sticker formore then a "base SS" which is hardly base at all.

Dealer found a Granite blue SS with no options in Red Deer. Lease rate is 1.4% and there is a program where I can get rid of my 323 and get $1000 towards the prchase of a new GM car. Plus my 1500 GM points.....

Will be doing some serious thinking over the next few days...... ;)

For those that can't see the Cardomain pics, I have updated them in my Gallery here. (http://www.cobaltss.net/gallery/browseimages.php?do=member&imageuser=52)
http://memimage.cardomain.net/member_images/7/web/511000-511999/511904_168_full.jpg

http://memimage.cardomain.net/member_images/7/web/511000-511999/511904_169_full.jpg

http://memimage.cardomain.net/member_images/7/web/511000-511999/511904_170_full.jpg


For those that can't see the Cardomain pics, I have updated them in my Gallery here. (http://www.cobaltss.net/gallery/browseimages.php?do=member&imageuser=52)

Not bad, I like the wheels :cool:

I may do some thinking.

Not a bad looking car, I don't agree with it's SS badging though. Perhaps first SS car to be under 200hp?

Maybe it's just a step in automotive evolution.

am i the only one that can't see the pics?

am i the only one that can't see the pics?


apparently ;)

Try my cardomain site:

http://www.cardomain.com/ride/511904/8

Yeah its odd having two SS cars powered by different engines (but then again they did in the 60's)..... but name aside, a great car!

Can't wait to see some numbers.....a low 15 would be nice

What a waste of SS badges.

In summary this car is great! A nice step between the 2.2L and the 2.0L S/C.
No guaddy winfg or oversized 17" rims. Car is a great value. I have seen loaded LS coupes that sticker formore then a "base SS" which is hardly base at all.







Doesn't the SS/SC come with

18" RIMS? :cssNET:

Doesn't the SS/SC come with

18" RIMS? :cssNET:

why yes it does.

But if you note the thread title, it says, "2006 Cobalt 2.4L SS pics" Not 2.0 S/C SS ;)

i may reconcider geting the SS/SC and just get the 2.4 version SS. its cheaper plus you can get it in auto and even 4 doors. you can put a turbo on it and you'll be talking some serious hp then :cssNET:

I wish the SS/SC had 17" wheels. Then maybe there would be more than two tires to choose from.

There alright looking but I'll stick with the SS s/c for sure. Go big or go Home. Just whoever buys the 06 SS , make sure when your telling stories about losing races to ppl, you don't make a mistake of thinking you have a real SS s/c!!

am i the only one that can't see the pics?
No you are not the only one

I wish the SS/SC had 17" wheels. Then maybe there would be more than two tires to choose from.

whats your beef with our P-Zeros?..

There alright looking but I'll stick with the SS s/c for sure. Go big or go Home. Just whoever buys the 06 SS , make sure when your telling stories about losing races to ppl, you don't make a mistake of thinking you have a real SS s/c!!

Hey no worries there. I'll be happy to tell peole I have a NA SS. I have drag raced for many years and once I get familar with it I am sure I can pull some very good times with it.

With the decrease in fuel economy, increaseed price and insurance I can't get an S/C SS so the SS is the next best thing (plus I hate the wing and 18's)

I'll probably buy the SS and be VERY happy with it :) I am not settling at all

why yes it does.

But if you note the thread title, it says, "2006 Cobalt 2.4L SS pics" Not 2.0 S/C SS ;)


The quote I was refering to was his remarks about the SS/SC. He said he likes the 2.4 better because it comes with smaller wheels.

"In summary this car is great! A nice step between the 2.2L and the 2.0L S/C.
No guaddy winfg or oversized 17" rims. Car is a great value. I have seen loaded LS coupes that sticker formore then a "base SS" which is hardly base at all."

this was his EXACT quote. Certainly the 2.2 doesn't come with a wing or 17" wheels so he must have meant the 2.0L S/C. Again, It was a mistake. :cssNET:

The quote I was refering to was his remarks about the SS/SC. He said he likes the 2.4 better because it comes with smaller wheels.

"In summary this car is great! A nice step between the 2.2L and the 2.0L S/C.
No guaddy winfg or oversized 17" rims. Car is a great value. I have seen loaded LS coupes that sticker formore then a "base SS" which is hardly base at all."

this was his EXACT quote. Certainly the 2.2 doesn't come with a wing or 17" wheels so he must have meant the 2.0L S/C. Again, It was a mistake. :cssNET:


oh you mean MY remarks! :lol:

Opps---I did say oversized 17's---err :red: ....my mistake. Yes it is a small plus over the S/C SS to me at least.

i thought the SS came with 17's? what size r on those cars u showed? i can't believe they used the same exact design as the SC wheels...

Not a bad looking car, I don't agree with it's SS badging though. Perhaps first SS car to be under 200hp?

Maybe it's just a step in automotive evolution.

Well, the SS name has been put on more than a few dogs. Exhibit A: 1983 Monte Carlo SS, only 175 HP for that heavy weight.

The 84-88 MC's only improved to 180HP.

Those cars were lucky to do the 1/4 mile in under 16 seconds stock. They beauty of these cars was is that they are RWD and can be highly modified.

i thought the SS came with 17's? what size r on those cars u showed? i can't believe they used the same exact design as the SC wheels...

SS are 17's I just made a typing eror.

It is different , but change is ok , It also makes you appreciate what you have right now. It was very cool. Now , would the supercharger fit from a 2.0 on a 2.4 SS ? That is a good question !!!!

I had to take my car SS/SC into the dealer to get the door panel replaced. Well they had an 06' Cobalt SS it was Amthyst well I can't spell today it was purple, nothing really impressed me it was very nice looking but reminded me of a reg. cobalt but if you can't afford the SS/SC i'd say GO FOR IT!!! :cssNET: :cssNET:

Who was the salesman at GSL??

I have drag raced for many years and once I get familar with it I am sure I can pull some very good times with it.

Did you ever race the 323? :nuts:

That was my first car years ago, I was just always curious. You should be able to run that SS down the track twice in the time it takes to run the 323. It was a fun car, though, could take a beating, and at least it could go faster than alot of other cars in the snow... ;)

I do miss it at times.

Who was the salesman at GSL??

Steve.....seemed nice and knows his stuff pretty good.

Did you ever race the 323? :nuts:

That was my first car years ago, I was just always curious. You should be able to run that SS down the track twice in the time it takes to run the 323. It was a fun car, though, could take a beating, and at least it could go faster than alot of other cars in the snow... ;)

I do miss it at times.

I am kicking myself for not racing it! Clutch is going so there is no point. But I was always curious.

Still energetic but can't put the power down very well. Only weighs 2200lbs and with the 4.11s its not terrible. I have some road tests of a 323 sedan...it did 17.2 in the 1/4 mile!
Not bad for 82hp! :)

I think I found an 05 SS S/C and will at least look into what the payments are and the insurance. Then I'd have to drive one to be sure. We'll see. Maybe they can swap the trunk lid (to get the small spoiler) with another car! I certainly would love the extra power ;)

I agree about the waste of SS badging. It sorta cheapens the designation of the SS on the SS/SC. Now when Im asked what I drive i gotta say SS/SC. Not that it is a lot of work but this is almost along the same lines as what Dodge did with the Neon, offering "SRT"-styling on a regular neon. I do have to admit that the spoiler on the Coupe SS has a nice look to it. It adds to the cars lines without coming off as cocky. The SS should be saved for vehicles designed for performance...not just looks. They could have come up with another moniker like "Sport" or "ES".

the dealer by me has 3 2.4l cobalt SS's... 2 coupes and one sedan, i really liked the sedan

i bought an 06 black ss saturday

Wow, cool, I can't wait for the first time a kid with a used Integra walks up to me and tells me how he blew the doors off a Cobalt SS "like mine".

yeah the 17" wheels look better to me , and if i had the SS s/c id be swaping on 17's anyway , i hate 18's and small side wall tires


im still waiting to see the dealer down the street from me get in some of the SS 2.4's , i want to drive 1

I really like the clean-looking exterior. The car doesn't have that boy-racer look, e.g. oversized rims and wings. It's good to hear that the suspension has been stiffened and the shifting refined. Why on earth didn't Chevy install the lovely white faced guages in this model that the '05 cars have? It's supposed to be an SS (top of the food chain). Perhaps a Z24 moniker would have been a better designation.

I like how the front end is nice and round, it doesn't just stop half way like it appears on the the other none SS models

(plus I hate the wing and 18's)

Two things that are quite easliy fixed for a decent price. However, swapping engines is another factor altogether. I agree with Ljavy17, what a waste of badges. But, other car companies do it so I guess we just gotta live with it!!! :-D

Nice car and all, but like others have said...it's a waste and a mockery of the SS badge.

Looks a little boring for an SS car as well. As a matter of fact, it looks like a stock LS with wheels. I wonder how many people with stock Cobalts will put SS badges on thier cars. I can imagine all the stories from the prelude and Integra camps about killing SS/SC's...ugh.


And about that boy racer comment...I've never had anyone give me shit on the streets or otherwise about my car looking stupid or ricey. I have however had a lot of positive comments from people in other vehicles as well as a few edlerly persons in parking lots.
The SS/SC's styling is spot on. In short, it's a joke that GM made the decision to badge another Cobalt with the SS emblem. There is no need other than the fact they did it for sales.
It should have been deemed the "Sport" not "Super Sport."

I think everyone that is bashing the new SS's are completely wrong and doing it for all the wrong reasons....

The SS badge works perfect on the new SS models, they are bigger engines bigger wheels better setup than the stock cars... why not call them the SS?? THe SS Supercharged is the top of the line the SS's are the bridge between the base cars and the SS/SC, It was a great idea on GM's part. Not everyone wants a supercharger, some people just want a decent sized engine with a good tranny and suspension setup. And the styling on an SS isnt suppsed to be out of this world... they ahve always been a "sleeper" type performer

To say one of the reasons you dont like it is becuase cars will claim they beat a SS/SC is just silly... if they didnt know whether a car has forced induction or not their opinion doesnt matter... dont use some BS honda excuse...

I think everyone that is bashing the new SS's are completely wrong and doing it for all the wrong reasons....

The SS badge works perfect on the new SS models, they are bigger engines bigger wheels better setup than the stock cars... why not call them the SS?? THe SS Supercharged is the top of the line the SS's are the bridge between the base cars and the SS/SC, It was a great idea on GM's part. Not everyone wants a supercharger, some people just want a decent sized engine with a good tranny and suspension setup. And the styling on an SS isnt suppsed to be out of this world... they ahve always been a "sleeper" type performer

To say one of the reasons you dont like it is becuase cars will claim they beat a SS/SC is just silly... if they didnt know whether a car has forced induction or not their opinion doesnt matter... dont use some BS honda excuse...

OK, you can turn the "good old boy" act off now. If you really are a Chevy fan as your log-in name claims, then you should come to respect that buyers who are forking out $4000 more for a particluar model expect to have some exclusivity to the badge that the car wears - just like Type S, GTI, GT, SiR, GSR...I think you get my point. The SS is a good upgrade for someone considering a LS or LT/LTZ or base coupe. But, IMO, the SS/SC is a much different car than the SS.

About the part of other's claiming of beating a SS thinking it's a SS/SC - I couldn't care less. But if I'm going to part with my hard earned $$ for a SS badge, then damn right it better be worth the cost. :)

I am kicking myself for not racing it! Clutch is going so there is no point. But I was always curious.

Still energetic but can't put the power down very well. Only weighs 2200lbs and with the 4.11s its not terrible. I have some road tests of a 323 sedan...it did 17.2 in the 1/4 mile!
Not bad for 82hp! :)

I think I found an 05 SS S/C and will at least look into what the payments are and the insurance. Then I'd have to drive one to be sure. We'll see. Maybe they can swap the trunk lid (to get the small spoiler) with another car! I certainly would love the extra power ;)

Trade in the firebird lol. No the n/a ss is pretty quick. You should be happy with it if you decide to buy it.

OK, you can turn the "good old boy" act off now. If you really are a Chevy fan as your log-in name claims, then you should come to respect that buyers who are forking out $4000 more for a particluar model expect to have some exclusivity to the badge that the car wears - just like Type S, GTI, GT, SiR, GSR...I think you get my point. The SS is a good upgrade for someone considering a LS or LT/LTZ or base coupe. But, IMO, the SS/SC is a much different car than the SS.




I hate to break it to you, but the SS/SC (05 - no xm) is officially priced LESS than what I paid for my fully loaded LS in May. By your theory, I should be entitled to some sort of exclusivity too! :lol:

I agree about the waste of SS badging. It sorta cheapens the designation of the SS on the SS/SC. Now when Im asked what I drive i gotta say SS/SC. Not that it is a lot of work but this is almost along the same lines as what Dodge did with the Neon, offering "SRT"-styling on a regular neon. I do have to admit that the spoiler on the Coupe SS has a nice look to it. It adds to the cars lines without coming off as cocky. The SS should be saved for vehicles designed for performance...not just looks. They could have come up with another moniker like "Sport" or "ES".


I agree also, All the mags like "Motor Trend" and "C&D" Have just gotten through praising chevy for finally taking its "SS" badge seriously and look what they go and do, put it on some crap <200 hp model.

Boo Chevy.....Boo

Why not give that model the less intense "Z__" designation? Way better idea.

Well I just got back from the dealer and test drove the 2.4 SS...and for those of you LS owners, let me reassure you, in terms of performance, I could barely tell the difference - and I was pushing it the whole test drive...

Without a doubt - the styling/rims are a great plus, but other than that, the difference is not that substantial...In fact I even asked about getting those 17's for my LS...they didn't have a part number yet, but for those interested, the SS/SC 18's retail for $910/ea (CDN) and the employee price is $565/ea so the 17's should be slightly cheaper...

Nice car and all, but like others have said...it's a waste and a mockery of the SS badge.

Looks a little boring for an SS car as well. As a matter of fact, it looks like a stock LS with wheels. I wonder how many people with stock Cobalts will put SS badges on thier cars. I can imagine all the stories from the prelude and Integra camps about killing SS/SC's...ugh.

You realize by your standards if you remove your front extension piece and add a lower grill like the 2.4 SS you also drive an LS.

Get over it guys there's nothing wrong with two engine choices. Purchasing a new car is the worst investment one could possibly make, who gives a s*** if it devalues the car. As for the SS badge, if you've never driven it how can you say it doesn't deserve it?

Give it a rest and enjoy your car. Quit worrying that someone is going to think your car is slow cause they beat a 2.4. Some crappy shifter with a SC could lose a race to a ricer cause he's a newbie. Why doesn't anyone worry about that. Because it's dumb that's why.

I can't wait until someone bolts on a turbo in the 2.4 and smokes the SS/SC. Then will you all stop with the hate? I hope so.

:-D

edit - jaded - The 32-bit control module is state of the art for a reason - regular fuel will detune the acceleration and performance characteristics. I should also point out the Ecotec doesn't get it's true grunt until a few thousand KM. Plus you shouldn't really judge on a brand new car (I sure wouldn't want to buy the one you were test driving).

After 1100 KM my 2.4 is completely different now, and with 91, it's unreal.

well.......we obviously have two camps here:

The die hard SS/SC who don't accept the regualr SS

and the those who do see some merit in the idea.

If it was up to me---I would have called it RS. BUT whats done is done---I don't care that much WHAT they called it. It has alot more perfromance then the 2.2L and alot better handling.

S/C SS guys think you have it bad if someone mistakes an SS for an S/C SS?

In the late 80s you could get a Trans Am with a 170hp 305 TBI engine--or go all the way up to 220-240hp (varied by year) 350 TPI---and the exteriors were IDENTICAL

Same with a 88-90 IROC-Z---lame ass 305 TBI 170hp, 190hp 305 TPI/auto, 220-230 HP TPI 305 5 speed or the 225-245hp 350 TPI.

No wonder 3rd gens got a bad rap for power.

The SS Cobalt will KILL a Mazda 3, Neon R/T, Ford Focus ST, Toyota Celica, 80's Monte Carlo SS, a 1967-1969 350 SS Camaro (there another case--350 V8 SS up to 396s (2-3 hp ratings for the 396)

I doubt anyone would convice anyone to change their opinion. It's a matter of preference I guess.

Meantime----I'll race anyone in Calgary who has a S/C SS and see if they can drive! (maybe I should get good with mine first)
All in good fun---I have no disdain for the S/C SS.
:D And maybe I'll get a plate thats says "No Boost"

well.......we obviously have two camps here:

The die hard SS/SC who don't accept the regualr SS

and the those who do see some merit in the idea.

If it was up to me---I would have called it RS. BUT whats done is done---I don't care that much WHAT they called it. It has alot more perfromance then the 2.2L and alot better handling.

S/C SS guys think you have it bad if someone mistakes an SS for an S/C SS?

In the late 80s you could get a Trans Am with a 170hp 305 TBI engine--or go all the way up to 220-240hp (varied by year) 350 TPI---and the exteriors were IDENTICAL

Same with a 88-90 IROC-Z---lame ass 305 TBI 170hp, 190hp 305 TPI/auto, 220-230 HP TPI 305 5 speed or the 225-245hp 350 TPI.

No wonder 3rd gens got a bad rap for power.

The SS Cobalt will KILL a Mazda 3, Neon R/T, Ford Focus ST, Toyota Celica, 80's Monte Carlo SS, a 1967-1969 350 SS Camaro (there another case--350 V8 SS up to 396s (2-3 hp ratings for the 396)

I doubt anyone would convice anyone to change their opinion. It's a matter of preference I guess.

Meantime----I'll race anyone in Calgary who has a S/C SS and see if they can drive! (maybe I should get good with mine first)
All in good fun---I have no disdain for the S/C SS.
:D And maybe I'll get a plate thats says "No Boost"

*Joyful that someone wrote something I completely agree with

"No Boost" LOL that was good. I'll do the same with BC plates. Maybe that'll satisfy some folks on here.

Well put my man :D

2.4 ss all the way! nice pics!

I don't see there being a big difference in fuel economy between the s/c and NA. i get about 33-34 mpg at highway cruisng speed (70mph). If the NA is better, it won't be enough to justify not buying the s/c. Also, I only pay $80/mo. for full coverage insurance on my s/c.

Ohh ! the humanity, how dare they SS badges on something without the stupor-charger in it ??? :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: Maybe I can get badges that say SC/SS !

I would agree with making the 2.4 the Z24 rather than the SS. Except, the Cobalt is already looked at by Chevy haters as "just a Cavalier" the Z24 moniker, while appropriate would only make that association with the Cavi stronger. Don't forget also that in addition to the SS badge there is also the supercharged badge (on the back anyway) if anyone is so concerned, order a couple extra supercharged badges for your doors too.

The arguement goes both ways, I think GM was more concerned with disassociating the Cobalt and Cavalier.

One more thing, they did the same with the Monte Carlo, I think it was 02-04 had SS as well as SS/SC.

I would agree with making the 2.4 the Z24 rather than the SS. Except, the Cobalt is already looked at by Chevy haters as "just a Cavalier" the Z24 moniker, while appropriate would only make that association with the Cavi stronger. Don't forget also that in addition to the SS badge there is also the supercharged badge (on the back anyway) if anyone is so concerned, order a couple extra supercharged badges for your doors too.

The arguement goes both ways, I think GM was more concerned with disassociating the Cobalt and Cavalier.

One more thing, they did the same with the Monte Carlo, I think it was 02-04 had SS as well as SS/SC.

goof points. Thats why I don't like Z24---associated with the Cavlaier. And the 2.4L SS is a much better perofrmer the the Z24 ever was. That was a half hearted attempt.

They have a red SS 2.4L by me. It is stickering for $21,450 with the auto. trans option. I agree it should be called something other then an SS. How about a Cobalt Z24, since it's 2.4L? That sounds like a better option then having all types of SS's running around. That would be like Dodge stripping the turdo off the SRT4 and keeping it the same name! As far as the performance goes, I bet the auto trans SS will have a hard time even cracking a high 15 second pass. You may see the 2.4L manual flirting in the 15.5-15.7 range. For an extra $1500-$2000 you could get the SS s/c Cobalt and slap the sh!t out of SS n/a Cobalt. Can you see what I mean about the right way GM should be naming these cars from my last sentance. That sucks!!

Maybe they can put a big "R" or maybe "Type R" behaind the badging on the SCed models. :lol: :lol: :lol:

"Badges? We don't need no stinking Badges."

Does it matter ? Really ?
When I was young ....(yep,flashback time)
I had a 1968 Camaro RS/SS
But some losers only had an SS , I had hideaway headlights and my directional/reverse light were below the bumpers not integrated , losers-all of them .
Oh , but wait I only had a 327 4 barrel with 275 horsepower. Other SS models(includingRS/SS models) offered more HP 327's and Oh no , a 396 , Now I am the loser , Oh crap . All I got is a crappy small block and the 396 can kick my a$$ , even with oversteer from weight.
And then there was those , those Z28 owners.... Stuck up ,too much $$$ people , buying all those interior luxeries- who needs 'em ? not me(AKA -I could not afford it).
This is just a satirical way of putting an age old topic. We should be happy with what we bought. We have choices. The more Cobalts on the road , the faster parts manufacturers will notice us. I , personally , want loads of crap to sift through and purchase for my ss/sc .
But , I will never say ....all you have is a ******** , Because it is both better than stock and better than nothing !
Whew ! I will get off my soapbox before I fall and hurt myself .
Please , no one take offense at this , as I am trying to not point fingers.
'nuff said :bow:

the ss/sc already has "supercharged" badges on both of the doors, right underneath the "ss" badges. and, btw, they each add 5 horsepower and contribute 3-4 lbs of boost to the car. yea, anyway, i'm not one to care about badges and monikers, but creating a cheaper version of the cobalt ss seems to me like an attempt to sell some more cars. especially offering it in automatic (eww) and a sedan model, gm would appear to be trying to appeal to a more 'mature' market. i.e. older people not set on big rims and spoilers, but who recall the halcyon days when ss meant something to them. so really, gm is just trying to capture the audience that the ss/sc misses. i do not however believe the 2.4 ss deserves the ss badgin, maybe a z badge or rs, but just throwing an ss badge on a car in an attempt to make it more appealing seems like a giant step backwards for any automaker. the ss badge symbolizes performance, something the n/a 2.4 cobalt couldn't muster on any given day. and anyone who keeps talking about getting the 2.4 ss and slapping a turbo on, have fun with that whole not having a warranty thing, let me know how that works out for ya.

gm is just trying to capture the audience that the ss/sc misses.

Viola ! It in no way takes anything away from what someone else is driving. People need to quit looking for ways to get their feelings hurt.

suspension wise the ss cobalt is alot better than my cav , but the feel of the power on the but dyno , both of my 2.4 cavs rate alot higher


keep in mind im talking butt dyno here , lol


the lowrpm tq output of the 2.4 tc motor , vs the low rpm feel of the 2.0s/c or the 2.4 vvt , is lacking because of the DRIVE-BY-WIRE , so your foot cant tell you butt dyno to start , lol


i was very happy with the drive i had in the 2.4 ss , more so than my drive in the 2.0sc


but cars ride well , but the 2.4 ss seamed to be happier on the road(for lack of better terms) , maybe it just suits my driving style more than the suspension on the s/c

but both are great cars

^^^^ HAHA Butt Dyno - Fu*kin priceless HAHA :nuts:

I don't see how it's humanly possible to say the 2.4 felt "more powerful than the 2.0L..I think some people are lying to themselves. That's like me saying : "yea, the V6 mustang just felt like it had more balls than the GT." :rolleyes:

I don't see how it's humanly possible to say the 2.4 felt "more powerful than the 2.0L..I think some people are lying to themselves. That's like me saying : "yea, the V6 mustang just felt like it had more balls than the GT." :rolleyes:

thats because feel is subjective and different for every perosn. He knows that the S/C and 2.4L SS will smoke his Z24 ;)

the question is, why does he have a Z24 anyway_? I could pass that thing going in reverse

06 SS 2.4

suspension wise the ss cobalt is alot better than my cav , but the feel of the power on the but dyno , both of my 2.4 cavs rate alot higher


keep in mind im talking butt dyno here , lol


the lowrpm tq output of the 2.4 tc motor , vs the low rpm feel of the 2.0s/c or the 2.4 vvt , is lacking because of the DRIVE-BY-WIRE , so your foot cant tell you butt dyno to start , lol


i was very happy with the drive i had in the 2.4 ss , more so than my drive in the 2.0sc


but cars ride well , but the 2.4 ss seamed to be happier on the road(for lack of better terms) , maybe it just suits my driving style more than the suspension on the s/c

but both are great cars

what an idiot........

detroit_motor if want to step up to my cav go for it , and its not a Z24 , its a 2.4 ls sedan


the 2.0 sc i drove has 7 miles on it the 2.4 has 22 miles , im guessing the 2.0 had87 in the tank knowing dealers , and it had about 1/8 of a tank if that


its a shame only 1 saw the humor , guess that shows most of you all are idiots


:lol: :lol: :cssNET: :cssNET:

ohhh OK, Yeah I was half in the bag when I made that statement, so I aplogize for my ignorance. I pick mine up tommorow. I'm having the dealer install those custom pulleys right off the bat. Living in detroit and working for GM can be, well awesome.




detroit_motor if want to step up to my cav go for it , and its not a Z24 , its a 2.4 ls sedan


the 2.0 sc i drove has 7 miles on it the 2.4 has 22 miles , im guessing the 2.0 had87 in the tank knowing dealers , and it had about 1/8 of a tank if that


its a shame only 1 saw the humor , guess that shows most of you all are idiots


:lol: :lol: :cssNET: :cssNET:

I also disagree with the SS badging for non sc, should have been RS

However I do think that the car will respond super well to mods. With simple bolts on you should go well over 200.

SS badging on the 2.4 was a bad choice by Chev.

Looks like it has the getrag tranny in the picture - shifter length.

SS badging on the 2.4 was a bad choice by Chev.

Why ??????? If it helps sales it's a good thing!!! Wouldn't you like the company that makes the car you like to stay in business ? Why would anyone ever give a sh_t what kind of badge another car has on it ????? :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: People need to stop looking for reasons to get their feelings hurt.......

Why ??????? If it helps sales it's a good thing!!! Wouldn't you like the company that makes the car you like to stay in business ? Why would anyone ever give a sh_t what kind of badge another car has on it ????? :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:


some people think the 2.4L SS is nothing more then an LS with a bigger engine. Some people are wrong.

Its performance gives it rights to use the SS badge. Some people can't handle more thn one SS but this is nothing new. In the 60's you had multiple engines with most SS cars.
And the 2.4L SS could beat alot of those SS cars.

some people think the 2.4L SS is nothing more then an LS with a bigger engine. Some people are wrong.

Its performance gives it rights to use the SS badge. Some people can't handle more thn one SS but this is nothing new. In the 60's you had multiple engines with most SS cars.
And the 2.4L SS could beat alot of those SS cars.

Yeah, I hear what you're saying. The SS and SS S/C are indentical in chassis, suspension, wheel hubs, brakes, etc. Just different in engines, transmission, wheel size, and one giant wing.

It's funny how many SS S/C owners get so defensive about there being another SS out there. I didn't know 34HP made you so much more superior. People, the SS S/C isn't a wickedly fast car, some of you are starting to develop SRT-4 complex.

the ss/sc and the ss 2.4 have different suspensions


the ss/sc has its own suspension , the ss 2.4 has its own , the 2.2 have thier own

You guys should see the potential in the 2.4 engine. Its only a 30 hp difference too. As soon as aftermarket shows up, I think it will scream. Throw an aftermarket blower on there and BAM, tons of torque AND hp!

Who knows what gm has in store for their ss/non sc as far as kits. Im seriously thinking about a non s/c. I may be too poor to afford a ss/sc. :lol: I actually work for my toys. ;)

i may reconcider geting the SS/SC and just get the 2.4 version SS. its cheaper plus you can get it in auto and even 4 doors. you can put a turbo on it and you'll be talking some serious hp then :cssNET:

C'mon!

What have this country's car enthusiasts come to? I agree with the turbo (That's what I intend to do when I trade in my base coupe for the 2.4 next year) but an AUTOMATIC?! Brother, you need an intervention. You can have your 4 doors, but don't be a woman! Manual, all the way!

I would agree with making the 2.4 the Z24 rather than the SS. Except, the Cobalt is already looked at by Chevy haters as "just a Cavalier" the Z24 moniker, while appropriate would only make that association with the Cavi stronger. Don't forget also that in addition to the SS badge there is also the supercharged badge (on the back anyway) if anyone is so concerned, order a couple extra supercharged badges for your doors too.

The arguement goes both ways, I think GM was more concerned with disassociating the Cobalt and Cavalier.

One more thing, they did the same with the Monte Carlo, I think it was 02-04 had SS as well as SS/SC.

Thank you!

As bredick said, there's just an SS badge on the 2.4 and there's a supercharger badge on the SS/SC. I've personally always like normally aspirated power anyway. That's all the ricers have EVER had was the amount of boost pressure and dumbass carbon fiber hoods! An SS for the rest of us won't devalue your blower! Calm down! We all own/love the same car!

An SS for the rest of us won't devalue your blower! Calm down! We all own/love the same car!


That right there sums it up better then I could ever put,

good show man, good show. :bow:

We do all love the same car, a few posts back i saw someone say my car should have an RS badge cause its 171hp 2.4L... i'd have still bought it that way, but it is true that in the 60's the SS name was on the same car with different engines. we're all brothers on this site if we own cobalts. if mine ever gets here (next week), i'll be an official part of the family with my 2.4L SS! i'll post pics too, there aren't too many out there of our car 2.4 guys... lets get some