2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

0-60, 100 Times W/ Cars Hitting Low 13's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 28, 2007 | 02:48 PM
  #1  
JKennedy1612's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-03-07
Posts: 2,553
Likes: 0
From: Missouri
0-60, 100 Times W/ Cars Hitting Low 13's

Hey I was curious to hear what your 0-60, 0-100 times are with the S/C hitting the quarter mile in the low 13's. Anyone?
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2007 | 04:05 PM
  #2  
ReMz's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-24-06
Posts: 1,142
Likes: 0
From: Fort Collins, CO
if i had to guess i would say that the 0-60 would be in the 5.5 range (maybe a bit lower) for a low 13 second cobalt.
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2007 | 04:11 PM
  #3  
Acidangel_5.0's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-25-06
Posts: 3,246
Likes: 0
From: Dacula, Georgia
well since the avg ss/sc speed at the track is probably like a 14.6-14.8 @ 94 - 98 mph

id say 100 mph would land you (avg driver) a 14.2-14.4
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2007 | 04:13 PM
  #4  
Ljavy17's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-01-05
Posts: 3,622
Likes: 0
From: Miami
with good tires and no wheel hop my car can do 0 to 60 in sub 5 seconds. the power is deff there.
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2007 | 04:49 PM
  #5  
R&C_rallySS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-09-06
Posts: 7,451
Likes: 0
From: PA
Originally Posted by Acidangel_5.0
well since the avg ss/sc speed at the track is probably like a 14.6-14.8 @ 94 - 98 mph

id say 100 mph would land you (avg driver) a 14.2-14.4
^ He is exactly right for 100mph. 0-100 in 14.2 seconds is right on with stock power. I have already ran 0-106 in 14.2seonds with stage II and a bad launch = alot of spinning.
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2007 | 04:50 PM
  #6  
R33P3R007's Avatar
360 L337 User
 
Joined: 08-11-05
Posts: 7,454
Likes: 0
From: Philadelphia, Pa
um.. less the 13 seconds.

i ran a 14.01 at 99.89 so i guess.

Last edited by R33P3R007; Feb 28, 2007 at 04:50 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2007 | 05:07 PM
  #7  
ReMz's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-24-06
Posts: 1,142
Likes: 0
From: Fort Collins, CO
Originally Posted by Ljavy17
with good tires and no wheel hop my car can do 0 to 60 in sub 5 seconds. the power is deff there.
with the right traction it's def sub 5 seconds.
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2007 | 05:13 PM
  #8  
Badmunky's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-26-05
Posts: 1,602
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
I have run a 13.826 at 107.6. So I would say I run 0-16 in about 5.5 and 0-100 in about 13.7.

Later
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2007 | 09:11 PM
  #9  
chevysalesman614's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-03-06
Posts: 4,638
Likes: 0
From: new jersey
Originally Posted by Badmunky
I have run a 13.826 at 107.6. So I would say I run 0-16 in about 5.5 and 0-100 in about 13.7.

Later
0-16 in 5.5 seconds what were you not on the gas? just coasting in first gear... lol
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2007 | 03:26 PM
  #10  
Badmunky's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-26-05
Posts: 1,602
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
^ LOL I ment 0-60...... LOL

My bad.

Later.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2007 | 04:00 PM
  #11  
TVS_SS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-28-06
Posts: 1,216
Likes: 0
From: United States
These cars are NOT sub 5 second in 0-60 in stock form.. even stage 2 you'd be pushing it

Look at the 0-60 foot times for almost everyone.. 2.2-2.4 seconds This really shows that our cars wont shine in the Zero-to-anything performance numbers. These cars shine in the 30-to-somthing numbers.. where 1st gear, FWD, Wheel hop, and non sticky tires dont come into play.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2007 | 05:24 PM
  #12  
βКˉSuPerCharged's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 11-12-06
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: Bradenton, FL
trap speed isn't everything, Some cars can run fast et's with slower traps,
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2007 | 06:40 PM
  #13  
idunn's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-20-06
Posts: 1,631
Likes: 0
From: Home: Holland, MI Stationed: Minot AFB, ND
i ran a 14.5 the other night with a 2.5 60ft and trapped at 100... on bald stock tires with crazy wheel hop and couldnt launch for ****. so 0-60 isnt so hot.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2007 | 10:35 PM
  #14  
Johnboy12358's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-05-06
Posts: 2,263
Likes: 0
From: DFW, TX
Yeah, I am starting to wonder about these tires, because if I am on it, I can spin half way through 2nd it seems like
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2007 | 02:23 AM
  #15  
Shortbus's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-25-06
Posts: 4,493
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by βКˉSuPerCharged
trap speed isn't everything, Some cars can run fast et's with slower traps,
Yea thats because those cars have a great 60ft time, which the cobalt doesnt.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 04:28 AM
  #16  
Badmunky's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-26-05
Posts: 1,602
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
My 60' times where around 2.1-2.2 last time at the track.
I want to get 2.0-1.9s this year.

Later
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 05:05 AM
  #17  
Spectral's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-30-06
Posts: 11,850
Likes: 0
From: Federal Way, Washington
Originally Posted by TVS_SS
These cars are NOT sub 5 second in 0-60 in stock form.. even stage 2 you'd be pushing it

Look at the 0-60 foot times for almost everyone.. 2.2-2.4 seconds This really shows that our cars wont shine in the Zero-to-anything performance numbers. These cars shine in the 30-to-somthing numbers.. where 1st gear, FWD, Wheel hop, and non sticky tires dont come into play.
lol yeah...and if you look at the guy who said that and look at his mods...him sayin sub 5 is quite easily believable.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 05:18 AM
  #18  
1gmfanatik's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-26-06
Posts: 9,753
Likes: 0
From: Marlton, NJ
With the poper suspension mods, I believe our cars can pull some decent zero to sixty times...Traction and wheel hop is the largest limiter for our cars. I also believe our cars are capable of high 13's with only traction and suspension mods.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 04:06 PM
  #19  
Badmunky's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-26-05
Posts: 1,602
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Im with him^

Later
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 04:13 PM
  #20  
Super_SS's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 01-12-07
Posts: 6,449
Likes: 0
From: N. Side Chi-Town
i dont knw how well these cars respond to motor mounts,but my old 150hp neon responded good on them...my 60ft was always 2.1-2.2 bone stock with just the motor mounts and 150 hp...i say thats pretty good...anyone make motor mounts for our cars that arent OVER priced?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Turbo Johnny
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
18
Feb 21, 2019 09:41 AM
vjoel2011
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
26
Oct 2, 2015 12:11 PM
CobaltSS 16
Parts
20
Sep 6, 2015 02:04 PM
Infamous SC/SS
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
5
Sep 4, 2015 05:33 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:19 PM.