CA stage 2 replacement pulley (2.79)questions
CA stage 2 replacement pulley (2.79)questions
CA Claims on their website that this pulley will bring the car into the correct AFR and run great on the gm stage 2 tune.. but what i read on this forum after searching around i find that people are saying even 2.8's are a no-no on the stage 2 tune. Does anyone have any experienced input on the subject? i was dumb and ordered this pulley when i ordered my stage 2, before reading up on things, i just dont want to hurt my new car and im learning alot by searching..im just looking for some straight up answers on this topic though..thanks alot guys..
-ryan
and stage 2 gets put in on monday
-ryan
and stage 2 gets put in on monday
depends. every single stage 2 tune i have is different than the next. so just going off what you read on the internet could be way off. like it is most of the time anyways
I have a 2.79" pulley on my car with the stage 2.I havent had any problems with it.I dont beat the **** out of it and i hardly redline line it,so im not worried about it.Ill see if i can get a hold of my dyno sheet and check what the a/f ratio was.I forget what it was,but i know it wasnt running dangerously lean.
thanks alot man..thats the type of feedback i was looking for...what kind of psi do you see? and does boost fall off at higher rpm? if you could find your dyno sheet that would be amazing man..thank you.
-ryan
-ryan
I have the dyno sheet,but i dont have the graph with the a/f ratio.The only thing i had done on this run was a k&n drop in filter and the 2.79" pulley.

Oh as for the psi,i see like 17-19 depending on how cold it is outside.

Oh as for the psi,i see like 17-19 depending on how cold it is outside.
Last edited by ptrblkz24; Oct 25, 2007 at 07:25 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
re
I have been running a gm stage 2 and 2.8" pulley combo for a year with absoluatly no issues at all. I had mine dyno'd and the afr was good, not running lean up top. I beat on mine all of the time. There is big debate on here about the stage 2 and 2.8" combo, but there has not been one instance of anyone blowing there motor, unlike some 60lb injector and custom tunes.
I would still recommend the 2.9" pulley just to be safe, as the 2.8" pulley generates lots of heated air, and without some cooling mods I would stick with the 2.9" pulley. Just my 2 cents.
I would still recommend the 2.9" pulley just to be safe, as the 2.8" pulley generates lots of heated air, and without some cooling mods I would stick with the 2.9" pulley. Just my 2 cents.
I have been running a gm stage 2 and 2.8" pulley combo for a year with absoluatly no issues at all. I had mine dyno'd and the afr was good, not running lean up top. I beat on mine all of the time. There is big debate on here about the stage 2 and 2.8" combo, but there has not been one instance of anyone blowing there motor, unlike some 60lb injector and custom tunes.
I would still recommend the 2.9" pulley just to be safe, as the 2.8" pulley generates lots of heated air, and without some cooling mods I would stick with the 2.9" pulley. Just my 2 cents.
I would still recommend the 2.9" pulley just to be safe, as the 2.8" pulley generates lots of heated air, and without some cooling mods I would stick with the 2.9" pulley. Just my 2 cents.
thanks alot man...those are some very nice numbers, and even before your exhaust mods wow..
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




