Dyno Results Dyno pictures, videos and dyno results.

461whp/484wtq - EFR LNF

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-02-2014, 05:58 PM
  #26  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
09CobaltSS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-12-09
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 4,910
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by rcd18
just curious, would i need to get the cams from zzp to run e47 on my bnr? I know you need the cams for E85 but just wondering if anything changes since its a mix
A lot really depends on how hard you plan on pushing the turbo. Past 25psi you're likely to need either the intake came with upgraded pump lobe, or 5th injector to avoid massive fuel rail pressure dips. Only logs from your tuner will really tell the big picture for your answer. I personally went the 5th injector route with my car. Granted most don't accept this is a viable long term solution, but I've had very good results with using it in the countless logs I ran on my engine. Some also claim that there's no way to accurately supply fueling to each individual cylinder. While this could possibly be true, until I see actual hard data to back this up I stand by my own results. Not to mention, try telling that to anyone making big power on a carb engine. The 5th injector is a similar principle as a carbed engine (central manifold fueling), just with more control than a carb.
Old 01-02-2014, 10:11 PM
  #27  
New Member
 
rcd18's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-01-11
Location: Dyer indiana
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 09CobaltSS1
A lot really depends on how hard you plan on pushing the turbo. Past 25psi you're likely to need either the intake came with upgraded pump lobe, or 5th injector to avoid massive fuel rail pressure dips. Only logs from your tuner will really tell the big picture for your answer. I personally went the 5th injector route with my car. Granted most don't accept this is a viable long term solution, but I've had very good results with using it in the countless logs I ran on my engine. Some also claim that there's no way to accurately supply fueling to each individual cylinder. While this could possibly be true, until I see actual hard data to back this up I stand by my own results. Not to mention, try telling that to anyone making big power on a carb engine. The 5th injector is a similar principle as a carbed engine (central manifold fueling), just with more control than a carb.
my plan is to run the 5th injector with the stock cams and like you said you wont really know untill its on the dyno with your tuner. but im just trying to get other opinions on using the stock cams with a 5th injector on e47 at 25-27 psi.
Old 01-02-2014, 10:15 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Boostin15's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-13-12
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
someday i will get to those numbers...
Old 01-21-2014, 02:08 PM
  #29  
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
r3v07ut10n's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-22-10
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^ lol this.. someday.
Old 04-04-2014, 07:51 AM
  #30  
Member
 
DCsnow1000's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-01-13
Location: White Marsh MD
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Congrats on the numbers. Very nice.
Old 05-06-2014, 09:28 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
ctn2mb's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-31-09
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 1,847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What's odd is I have a LDK with the larger fuel lobe on the ZFR and I'm still running out of fuel at anything over 25 psi lol
Old 05-09-2014, 12:41 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
Sl0wbaltSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-27-13
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,555
Received 22 Likes on 22 Posts
Originally Posted by cluelessk
Perfect car. Looks like a sleeper. No obnoxious exhaust either.

Jealous.
It is NOT a sleeper. This is asleeper.
Old 05-26-2014, 11:51 AM
  #33  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Wert842's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-12-11
Location: PA
Posts: 4,336
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Just curious, do you know what happened on the last pull? What was with the dip in power?
Old 05-27-2014, 10:08 AM
  #34  
Senior Member
 
Terminator2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-25-08
Location: Florida
Posts: 12,478
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Wert842
Just curious, do you know what happened on the last pull? What was with the dip in power?
Rail pressure dropped is my guess. That torque level suggests a huge boost spike and the hp is lower than the torque which means the torque is dropping off fast. That is more than 28 psi making 480 wrtq it would take closer to a 33-34 psi spike to make the ZFR make that much peak torque. The WG is likely just cranked to 100% the whole way.

Numbers are STD corrected. SAE corrected it would have made around the same whp as your car did SAE (around 445 whp and 465 wrtq) and yours did not need E-47 or a 34 psi boost spike at 4000 RPMs.

Last edited by Terminator2; 05-27-2014 at 10:16 AM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Zharrington_2010LNF
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
21
02-08-2016 01:43 PM
KMO43
Front Page News
33
01-12-2016 12:01 AM
Jesse
Parts
15
10-13-2015 09:32 PM
patooyee
Wanted - What to buy - All categories
0
10-01-2015 01:07 PM
KMO43
Featured Car Showcase
37
09-27-2015 08:53 PM



Quick Reply: 461whp/484wtq - EFR LNF



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:42 AM.