Aaron-ss-tc dyno
03-02-2014, 05:34 PM
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: 07-24-11
Location: Bradenton, FL.
Posts: 2,983
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Aaron-ss-tc dyno
<BR>
317WHP/384WTQ
2008 COBALT SS/TC 62K MILES
NON LSD
TERMINATOR2 HP TUNE AT 24PSI & 16.5* TIMING
GMPP CLUTCH
ZZP INTERCOOLER KIT
K&N INTAKE
TURBO-XS CATTED DOWNPIPE
MUFFLER DELETE
FORGE BPV
H&R SPORT SPRINGS
225/40/18 tires on stock powder-coated rims
I told the guy to hold the traction control to turn the ESC off, but that did not happen because it was on and so was the ABS light when he got it off the dyno, plus the second run didn't even pull right.
It was misfiring and breaking up a bit before I dyno'd though, so I'm sure it has more in it...
My best 1/4 mile is a 12.9 @ 111mph, but runs 13.0-13.2 consistently.
03-02-2014, 05:40 PM
#2
Senior Member
Forgive me I'm a dyno newb but sholdn't he of gave you a free pull because he obv screwed up the 2nd run?
Also nice tq numbers! And I love the all black look without the wing. Also what type of fuel you running.
Oh and a vid would've been sick.
Also nice tq numbers! And I love the all black look without the wing. Also what type of fuel you running.
Oh and a vid would've been sick.
03-02-2014, 05:45 PM
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: 07-24-11
Location: Bradenton, FL.
Posts: 2,983
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
he should have but he acted like he couldnt hear me, but for $45, it still was okay i guess, and they were super busy do to a car show it was at.
93 ctane shell gas btw...
03-02-2014, 07:54 PM
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: 07-24-11
Location: Bradenton, FL.
Posts: 2,983
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
THANKS MAN, BUT I ACTUALLY WAS UNHAPPY WITH IT, BUT IT HASNT BEEN RUNNING VERY WELL FOR A WHILE AND I CANT FIGURE OUT WHY...
HERE IS TERM2'S NUMBERS A FEW YEARS AGO, DAAAAAMN
1. Terminator2 345whp, 375wtq Verified Dynocom T, I, DP, CD, CP, IC
HERE IS TERM2'S NUMBERS A FEW YEARS AGO, DAAAAAMN
1. Terminator2 345whp, 375wtq Verified Dynocom T, I, DP, CD, CP, IC
03-02-2014, 08:13 PM
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: 07-24-11
Location: Bradenton, FL.
Posts: 2,983
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Im bored with it, even like a few months after it was tuned , especially since the powerband is so small.
Wish i had 450-500whp and a bigger powerband in my 2900lb car, now that would be fun. Ha
Wish i had 450-500whp and a bigger powerband in my 2900lb car, now that would be fun. Ha
03-03-2014, 12:02 AM
#9
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
317/384 is not shabby in the least my friend. That's pretty on par for a stock turbo 93 octane setup at your boost level so I wouldn't be upset in the least with that. Just so you're aware, the ABS light ALWAYS comes on for a LNF on the dyno even with ESC completely off. Just think of it, the ABS system is sensing that the car is traveling 50-100mph from the front what the wheel speed sensors are reporting, yet the rear wheels are reporting a big fat goose egg to the system. It just makes the system sort of go into a tizzy and light up your dash a bit. It doesn't effect anything as far as power output goes though. You would however know pretty much right away if your traction control indeed was not off. You would have had a pretty tough time breaking 250whp even with a badass tune. Ask me how I know.. lol
03-03-2014, 03:48 AM
#10
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: 03-16-12
Location: Sussex County, DE
Posts: 827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
317/384 is not shabby in the least my friend. That's pretty on par for a stock turbo 93 octane setup at your boost level so I wouldn't be upset in the least with that. Just so you're aware, the ABS light ALWAYS comes on for a LNF on the dyno even with ESC completely off. Just think of it, the ABS system is sensing that the car is traveling 50-100mph from the front what the wheel speed sensors are reporting, yet the rear wheels are reporting a big fat goose egg to the system. It just makes the system sort of go into a tizzy and light up your dash a bit. It doesn't effect anything as far as power output goes though. You would however know pretty much right away if your traction control indeed was not off. You would have had a pretty tough time breaking 250whp even with a badass tune. Ask me how I know.. lol
03-03-2014, 11:47 AM
#16
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: 07-24-11
Location: Bradenton, FL.
Posts: 2,983
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Except you have 30-40wtq more than me, damn...lol
maybe catless and exhaust would help with both hp and torque 8-10...
Well, hopefully i can either sell my k04, or make it a k04-r and put down better numbers and powerband.
I WAS THINKING i HAVE EITHER A BOOST OR VAC LEAK DO TO MY MISFIRES AND JUMPY BOOST GAUGE.
maybe catless and exhaust would help with both hp and torque 8-10...
Well, hopefully i can either sell my k04, or make it a k04-r and put down better numbers and powerband.
I WAS THINKING i HAVE EITHER A BOOST OR VAC LEAK DO TO MY MISFIRES AND JUMPY BOOST GAUGE.
03-03-2014, 12:29 PM
#18
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: 07-24-11
Location: Bradenton, FL.
Posts: 2,983
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mine idles bad off and on, and it hates 4th gear, it jumpy as im driving.
They dynoed me in 4th gear too.
Hell, it only put 260whp down in the second pull, haha
They dynoed me in 4th gear too.
Hell, it only put 260whp down in the second pull, haha
03-04-2014, 09:10 AM
#20
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Dynocom's are notoriously high reading just so you know. Plus you can't compare one set of dyno numbers to the next. It's only relative and comperable if you were both using the same dyno in the same conditions. Even correction factors aren't perfect. Other than that it's a pretty good crap shoot
03-04-2014, 11:20 AM
#21
Senior Member
Dynocom's are notoriously high reading just so you know. Plus you can't compare one set of dyno numbers to the next. It's only relative and comperable if you were both using the same dyno in the same conditions. Even correction factors aren't perfect. Other than that it's a pretty good crap shoot
03-04-2014, 11:37 AM
#22
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: 07-24-11
Location: Bradenton, FL.
Posts: 2,983
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They are both about the same distance away from a perfect 1.0, but ive noticed higher torque numbers in 3rd gear on some cars vs 4th gear pulls.
Mine was done in 4th btw.
Hopefully I can figure out why my car drives like crap, and maybe do a k04-r if I dont sell my k04 kit I have, then put down some higher, solid numbers and graph.
Mine was done in 4th btw.
Hopefully I can figure out why my car drives like crap, and maybe do a k04-r if I dont sell my k04 kit I have, then put down some higher, solid numbers and graph.
03-04-2014, 12:19 PM
#23
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
It doesn't really matter all too much which gear you use. On some dynos 4th gear does net more power though especially with a larger turbo. The taller gear loads the turbo more which creates more heat which ultimately produces a bit more power at the wheels. This is a fact regardless of what the kiddies want to tell you. The k04 does tend to surge a bit in 4th if you're not careful though.