Cobalt SS Network

Dyno Results Dyno pictures, videos and dyno results.

Ko4+ dyno

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-15-2016, 09:24 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
63 Nova SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-12-12
Location: Indiana
Posts: 5,485
Received 316 Likes on 296 Posts
Even though no one pays much attn to the dyno thread anymore I figured I would still post mine from last year due to upgrading turbos over the winter. Mods- fbo- E,DP,T,IC,Cp,gms1,CAI, ko4+ E47 tuned by 09CobaltSS1 dynojet 372/384
image-4172448260.jpg
63 Nova SS is offline  
Reply Like
Old 11-15-2016, 11:41 PM
  #2  
Moderator
Platinum Member
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Slowbalt2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-15-11
Location: Livonia, MI
Posts: 27,413
Received 584 Likes on 519 Posts
Nice dude, those are some really solid numbers.
Slowbalt2000 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 11-16-2016, 07:48 AM
  #3  
Administrator
Administrator
Platinum Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Staged07SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-30-07
Location: NEPA
Posts: 14,331
Received 197 Likes on 175 Posts
I pay attention to the dyno thread. Get them posted.

I've been super busy at work. That's why I haven't updated in a while.

As long as they get posted in there, they will be one day added to the list.
Staged07SS is offline  
Reply Like
Old 11-16-2016, 08:05 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
63 Nova SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-12-12
Location: Indiana
Posts: 5,485
Received 316 Likes on 296 Posts
Originally Posted by Staged07SS
I pay attention to the dyno thread. Get them posted. I've been super busy at work. That's why I haven't updated in a while. As long as they get posted in there, they will be one day added to the list.
I will still argue that the + being between stock and the r wheel wise, shouldn't be thrown into the "bigger turbo" dyno numbers. There are a few on the k04 list that dyno'd using the +. I guess with not many posting numbers on the sight anymore it doesn't really matter.
63 Nova SS is offline  
Reply Like
Old 11-16-2016, 09:14 AM
  #5  
Administrator
Administrator
Platinum Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Staged07SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-30-07
Location: NEPA
Posts: 14,331
Received 197 Likes on 175 Posts
Originally Posted by 63 Nova SS
I will still argue that the + being between stock and the r wheel wise, shouldn't be thrown into the "bigger turbo" dyno numbers. There are a few on the k04 list that dyno'd using the +. I guess with not many posting numbers on the sight anymore it doesn't really matter.
I should re word it... I didn't create the dyno thread... I took over.

In my mind, any deviation from the stock Ko4 should be bunched together. Thats' how I have it in the LSJ section which I thoroughly updated.
Staged07SS is offline  
Reply Like
Old 11-16-2016, 09:34 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
T-Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-07-09
Location: The Desert
Posts: 1,461
Received 89 Likes on 76 Posts
Curve looks good

Do you have the SAE numbers too?
T-Man is offline  
Reply Like
Old 11-16-2016, 02:43 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
63 Nova SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-12-12
Location: Indiana
Posts: 5,485
Received 316 Likes on 296 Posts
Originally Posted by T-Man
Curve looks good Do you have the SAE numbers too?
I do not
63 Nova SS is offline  
Reply Like
Old 11-16-2016, 02:49 PM
  #8  
Administrator
Administrator
Platinum Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Staged07SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-30-07
Location: NEPA
Posts: 14,331
Received 197 Likes on 175 Posts
I have a conversion factor from my car I can give you for SAE and STD.

Wont be 100% but will give u an idea.
Staged07SS is offline  
Reply Like
Old 11-16-2016, 03:17 PM
  #9  
Slobodan Milošević
iTrader: (8)
 
07blackg5's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-05-07
Location: Serbia
Posts: 5,960
Received 215 Likes on 175 Posts
the few times I dynod, the SAE correction was within 10 hp/tq of the STD corrected figures.
07blackg5 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 11-16-2016, 06:24 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
63 Nova SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-12-12
Location: Indiana
Posts: 5,485
Received 316 Likes on 296 Posts
Originally Posted by 07blackg5
the few times I dynod, the SAE correction was within 10 hp/tq of the STD corrected figures.
Cobalt's drive train doesn't scrub off as much as some. I'm guessing about 12% drive train loss. Now my nova that runs a turbo 409 rwd, it's probably closer to 20%. I know it takes about 20 motor hp more to turn the turbo 400 verses 350. But that's old school stuff you all probably don't care about.
63 Nova SS is offline  
Reply Like
Old 11-17-2016, 07:19 AM
  #11  
Administrator
Administrator
Platinum Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Staged07SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-30-07
Location: NEPA
Posts: 14,331
Received 197 Likes on 175 Posts
Not sure if you saw my post but my SAE to STD conversion was 1.02225.

You can use that to get a rough idea of yours.
Staged07SS is offline  
Reply Like
Old 11-17-2016, 09:28 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
06blackbalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-28-06
Location: JEANERETTE,LA
Posts: 1,434
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Nice
06blackbalt is offline  
Reply Like
Old 11-17-2016, 01:08 PM
  #13  
Slobodan Milošević
iTrader: (8)
 
07blackg5's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-05-07
Location: Serbia
Posts: 5,960
Received 215 Likes on 175 Posts
Originally Posted by Staged07SS
Not sure if you saw my post but my SAE to STD conversion was 1.02225.

You can use that to get a rough idea of yours.
That comes out almost exactly correct for me
07blackg5 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 11-17-2016, 02:38 PM
  #14  
Administrator
Administrator
Platinum Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Staged07SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-30-07
Location: NEPA
Posts: 14,331
Received 197 Likes on 175 Posts
Originally Posted by 07blackg5
That comes out almost exactly correct for me
Staged07SS is offline  
Reply Like
Back to Subforum
Dyno Results
View Next Unread
Zfr 7163




Advanced Search

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:10 PM.