Staged07SS finally goes to the dyno!
10-07-2014, 07:20 AM
#76
Other than that, I have the highest power numbers with an H62. Back in the day, a member on the redline forums made 270whp with a 2.9, 42's and exhaust with an H62.
I'm not into all out power numbers. I built my car to follow the buildbook and time attack engine specs, and I've hit my mark. A 50 shot and some other tweaks will be made over the next few years, but thats about it.
The power delivery of my car is very strong, and it pulls hard through the whole band, actually at any rpm it will put ya back in the seat nice.
Good enough for me
Last edited by Staged07SS; 10-07-2014 at 07:27 AM.
10-07-2014, 10:01 AM
#80
Time attack did.... unofficially 320whp off nitrous, 400whp with a 100 shot (higher comp pistons would get me there).
Other than that, I have the highest power numbers with an H62. Back in the day, a member on the redline forums made 270whp with a 2.9, 42's and exhaust with an H62.
I'm not into all out power numbers. I built my car to follow the buildbook and time attack engine specs, and I've hit my mark. A 50 shot and some other tweaks will be made over the next few years, but thats about it.
The power delivery of my car is very strong, and it pulls hard through the whole band, actually at any rpm it will put ya back in the seat nice.
Good enough for me
Other than that, I have the highest power numbers with an H62. Back in the day, a member on the redline forums made 270whp with a 2.9, 42's and exhaust with an H62.
I'm not into all out power numbers. I built my car to follow the buildbook and time attack engine specs, and I've hit my mark. A 50 shot and some other tweaks will be made over the next few years, but thats about it.
The power delivery of my car is very strong, and it pulls hard through the whole band, actually at any rpm it will put ya back in the seat nice.
Good enough for me
10-07-2014, 10:16 AM
#81
It was a way of expressing the car runs strong. Doesnt need to be taken so literally.
For reference, I have been in much more powerful cars than my little 300hp Cobalt. So I do know what actually being "thrown" back in the seat is.
Not sure, he might have. Never saw the graph.
I forgot he had one back in the day.
Last edited by Staged07SS; 10-09-2014 at 07:29 AM.
10-07-2014, 11:37 AM
#84
Missing/destroyed.... There were a total of 7 at one time (not including Time Attack).
There is one other I know of that may still exist. He is a member on here, but hasnt made a post in years.
Last time I spoke with him, he still had it installed on his car.
No they def did not.
So I'm "officially" the highest powered H62 car, lol.
Me, myself, & I!!
There is one other I know of that may still exist. He is a member on here, but hasnt made a post in years.
Last time I spoke with him, he still had it installed on his car.
So I'm "officially" the highest powered H62 car, lol.
Me, myself, & I!!
10-14-2014, 06:57 PM
#90
Only 7 made!!!??? Good job man, I always thought with my GMStg2 honed mani and hahn exhaust I made good power but wondered why I was making peak power a little higher in the powerband, i chalked it up to the injectors running lean but I guess that wasnt the case...
So I've been out of the game for a while and missed the whole 1.6 lysholm SC unveiling. Guess these were a one time thing? If so how many of these rareties were made?
So I've been out of the game for a while and missed the whole 1.6 lysholm SC unveiling. Guess these were a one time thing? If so how many of these rareties were made?
10-15-2014, 07:21 AM
#91
Only 7 made!!!??? Good job man, I always thought with my GMStg2 honed mani and hahn exhaust I made good power but wondered why I was making peak power a little higher in the powerband, i chalked it up to the injectors running lean but I guess that wasnt the case...
So I've been out of the game for a while and missed the whole 1.6 lysholm SC unveiling. Guess these were a one time thing? If so how many of these rareties were made?
So I've been out of the game for a while and missed the whole 1.6 lysholm SC unveiling. Guess these were a one time thing? If so how many of these rareties were made?
Only a few 1.6 lysholm kits were made as well. Not sure on the exact number.
10-26-2014, 09:40 PM
#93
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: 08-12-09
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think that the H62 would have a little less power output than a TVS on the same size pulley. It's been proven that the TVS on the original pulley makes 280 WHP on a completely stock LSJ and if you were to pulley down to a 3.0" pulley it might gain enough power to make 290 WHP.
Now this is just an assumption but because of the displacement increase on the TVS; same pulley size; I think that it would make about 15-20 WHP less than a TVS. Could be more or could be less.
Now this is just an assumption but because of the displacement increase on the TVS; same pulley size; I think that it would make about 15-20 WHP less than a TVS. Could be more or could be less.
10-27-2014, 07:09 AM
#94
I think that the H62 would have a little less power output than a TVS on the same size pulley. It's been proven that the TVS on the original pulley makes 280 WHP on a completely stock LSJ and if you were to pulley down to a 3.0" pulley it might gain enough power to make 290 WHP.
Now this is just an assumption but because of the displacement increase on the TVS; same pulley size; I think that it would make about 15-20 WHP less than a TVS. Could be more or could be less.
Now this is just an assumption but because of the displacement increase on the TVS; same pulley size; I think that it would make about 15-20 WHP less than a TVS. Could be more or could be less.
It's obvious the Harrop would make more power than the H62. No need to compare.
Regardless, I still make more power than some TVS setups out there. Well, actually my blower is a TVS as well, just a 3 lobe version....
Not only is it a TVS, it was an early prototype for the 6th gen rotors.
Last edited by Staged07SS; 10-27-2014 at 07:16 AM.
10-28-2014, 10:22 PM
#98
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: 08-12-09
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Point of all of this??
It's obvious the Harrop would make more power than the H62. No need to compare.
Regardless, I still make more power than some TVS setups out there. Well, actually my blower is a TVS as well, just a 3 lobe version....
Not only is it a TVS, it was an early prototype for the 6th gen rotors.
It's obvious the Harrop would make more power than the H62. No need to compare.
Regardless, I still make more power than some TVS setups out there. Well, actually my blower is a TVS as well, just a 3 lobe version....
Not only is it a TVS, it was an early prototype for the 6th gen rotors.
If all Eaton has to do is twist the lobes more then why wouldn't they make rotor replacements? Cost aside...
10-29-2014, 07:15 AM
#99
They were going to make a rotor replacement. It was rumored as a GMS4 kit. This was way way back in the day though.
You really cant just swap my rotors into an M62, because the outlet port on the M62 would not match the twist of the 120 degree H62 rotors. Porting would need to be done.
Most likely a good reason why GM scrapped any plans of such a thing.
I asked Eaton back in 2010 if they could make me H62 rotors, and their answer was the cost wouldnt be worth it since it is not a production blower.
Last edited by Staged07SS; 10-29-2014 at 11:33 AM.