Term2 Tune 91octane LNF record?
#51
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
I have an interesting contribution to this thread.
A few months ago, we flashed a Term2 tune on a club member's 2009 LNF, fully bolted, 91 octane.
He went to a dyno day today. Mustang dyno. Car makes a stupid 360whp/368wtq.
Bullshit, right? That's what I thought. When I texted Term, he thought BS as well. After all, that's the equivalent of like 400whp on a dynojet. Yep, happy dyno for sure.
But wait.
This morning I pulled the stock tune from another club member's 2008 LNF. He's bolted on 91 octane as well. He will get his T2 tune flashed in 2 weeks. I told him about the dyno day and how it might be nice for him to have his stock numbers as a base line.
So he went over and made...224whp/275wtq. Same dyno. Same day. Same Weather Correction Factor (WCF).
Stock LNF's should be within ~5 whp. That means a gain of 136whp. On pump gas.
Sure the dyno probably reads a little high. 224 on a Mustang dyno is about 250 on a DynoJet. That's definitely high. But the differential is the differential!?
Screen shots below for evidence!
Discuss!
2009 LNF, fully bolted, 91 octane, Term2 tuned:
2008 LNF, fully bolted, 91 octane, stock tune:
A few months ago, we flashed a Term2 tune on a club member's 2009 LNF, fully bolted, 91 octane.
He went to a dyno day today. Mustang dyno. Car makes a stupid 360whp/368wtq.
Bullshit, right? That's what I thought. When I texted Term, he thought BS as well. After all, that's the equivalent of like 400whp on a dynojet. Yep, happy dyno for sure.
But wait.
This morning I pulled the stock tune from another club member's 2008 LNF. He's bolted on 91 octane as well. He will get his T2 tune flashed in 2 weeks. I told him about the dyno day and how it might be nice for him to have his stock numbers as a base line.
So he went over and made...224whp/275wtq. Same dyno. Same day. Same Weather Correction Factor (WCF).
Stock LNF's should be within ~5 whp. That means a gain of 136whp. On pump gas.
Sure the dyno probably reads a little high. 224 on a Mustang dyno is about 250 on a DynoJet. That's definitely high. But the differential is the differential!?
Screen shots below for evidence!
Discuss!
2009 LNF, fully bolted, 91 octane, Term2 tuned:
2008 LNF, fully bolted, 91 octane, stock tune:
#53
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Well this is what I said
If you were on e85 with your current numbers, like every other lnf cobalt owner on e47/e85 (+/-350whp/400wtq), you should walk that evo. The fact he beats you by three cars is a huge testimony to the ridiculously high numbers - for whatever reason. You don't have a unicorn cobalt. I was being sarcastic with my e47 comment above. Long story short, go race an lnf on e85 making your numbers and report back lol
"Shrugs"
If you were on e85 with your current numbers, like every other lnf cobalt owner on e47/e85 (+/-350whp/400wtq), you should walk that evo. The fact he beats you by three cars is a huge testimony to the ridiculously high numbers - for whatever reason. You don't have a unicorn cobalt. I was being sarcastic with my e47 comment above. Long story short, go race an lnf on e85 making your numbers and report back lol
"Shrugs"
#55
Senior Member
FWIW Elmers car pulls about as hard as yours did on stock turbo and E-85. Yours made more peak torque due to 2-3psi higher boost at 3500 or so so yours hit a little harder down low but the top end pull is similar when I look at the logs.
#59
Senior Member
#60
Senior Member
Another note I just sent Adrian (Colodude18) an E-85 tune for that 08 that did the stock tune dyno run on the Mustang dyno. Hopefully he will get to run it on that same dyno with the new tune. 223 whp stock let us see what it makes tuned on E-85. Apparently every car I tune dynos on happy dynos I guess 😂😂😂.
#61
Senior Member
268 whp GMS1 on the same dyno as the OP which is on the low normal end for dynojet numbers on GMS1 car (seen as high as 283 whp on a dynojet) so it seems to not read as high as everyone seems to think.
#62
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Originally Posted by Terminator2
268 whp GMS1 on the same dyno as the OP which is on the low normal end for dynojet numbers on GMS1 car (seen as high as 283 whp on a dynojet) so it seems to not read as high as everyone seems to think.
#65
Senior Member
Thread Starter
#66
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
^^this. The Weather Correction Factor adjusts the numbers for temperature, humidity and barometric pressure. That's why the numbers "with WCF" I posted are so much higher; we're at 5,400 feet altitude, meaning the car makes less power here than at sea level. That's also how we can get away with running full E85 on stock turbo without any fueling mods
#67
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
Another note I just sent Adrian (Colodude18) an E-85 tune for that 08 that did the stock tune dyno run on the Mustang dyno. Hopefully he will get to run it on that same dyno with the new tune. 223 whp stock let us see what it makes tuned on E-85. Apparently every car I tune dynos on happy dynos I guess 😂😂😂.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post