Dyno Results Dyno pictures, videos and dyno results.

Term2 Tune 91octane LNF record?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-26-2015, 11:31 PM
  #51  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
colodude18's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-12-10
Location: Greater Denver Area, Colorado
Posts: 2,692
Received 171 Likes on 142 Posts
I have an interesting contribution to this thread.
A few months ago, we flashed a Term2 tune on a club member's 2009 LNF, fully bolted, 91 octane.
He went to a dyno day today. Mustang dyno. Car makes a stupid 360whp/368wtq.
Bullshit, right? That's what I thought. When I texted Term, he thought BS as well. After all, that's the equivalent of like 400whp on a dynojet. Yep, happy dyno for sure.

But wait.

This morning I pulled the stock tune from another club member's 2008 LNF. He's bolted on 91 octane as well. He will get his T2 tune flashed in 2 weeks. I told him about the dyno day and how it might be nice for him to have his stock numbers as a base line.

So he went over and made...224whp/275wtq. Same dyno. Same day. Same Weather Correction Factor (WCF).

Stock LNF's should be within ~5 whp. That means a gain of 136whp. On pump gas.

Sure the dyno probably reads a little high. 224 on a Mustang dyno is about 250 on a DynoJet. That's definitely high. But the differential is the differential!?

Screen shots below for evidence!

Discuss!

2009 LNF, fully bolted, 91 octane, Term2 tuned:



2008 LNF, fully bolted, 91 octane, stock tune:
Old 09-28-2015, 09:08 PM
  #52  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
colodude18's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-12-10
Location: Greater Denver Area, Colorado
Posts: 2,692
Received 171 Likes on 142 Posts
Nobody? A 400whp stock turbo 91 octane unicorn?
Old 09-28-2015, 11:26 PM
  #53  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
taintedred07's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-03-12
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 1,358
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Well this is what I said

If you were on e85 with your current numbers, like every other lnf cobalt owner on e47/e85 (+/-350whp/400wtq), you should walk that evo. The fact he beats you by three cars is a huge testimony to the ridiculously high numbers - for whatever reason. You don't have a unicorn cobalt. I was being sarcastic with my e47 comment above. Long story short, go race an lnf on e85 making your numbers and report back lol

"Shrugs"
Old 09-29-2015, 09:48 AM
  #54  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
colodude18's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-12-10
Location: Greater Denver Area, Colorado
Posts: 2,692
Received 171 Likes on 142 Posts
I hear ya. Problem is that we don't have any stock Cobalts on e in the state. First thing everyone does is intake, down pipe, T2 tune. Ethanol typically comes after that. We could of course measure his car up to another T2 tuned LNF.
Old 09-29-2015, 10:11 AM
  #55  
Senior Member
 
Terminator2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-25-08
Location: Florida
Posts: 12,478
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by colodude18
I hear ya. Problem is that we don't have any stock Cobalts on e in the state. First thing everyone does is intake, down pipe, T2 tune. Ethanol typically comes after that. We could of course measure his car up to another T2 tuned LNF.
FWIW Elmers car pulls about as hard as yours did on stock turbo and E-85. Yours made more peak torque due to 2-3psi higher boost at 3500 or so so yours hit a little harder down low but the top end pull is similar when I look at the logs.
Old 09-29-2015, 02:27 PM
  #56  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
colodude18's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-12-10
Location: Greater Denver Area, Colorado
Posts: 2,692
Received 171 Likes on 142 Posts
Originally Posted by Terminator2
FWIW Elmers car pulls about as hard as yours did on stock turbo and E-85. Yours made more peak torque due to 2-3psi higher boost at 3500 or so so yours hit a little harder down low but the top end pull is similar when I look at the logs.
That's impressive. That setup of mine dynoed at 359whp so I guess he's right around there. I've kinda forgotten what my E85 K04 setup felt like. You get spoiled quickly
Old 10-04-2015, 08:24 AM
  #57  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Canadia's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-07-12
Location: Dartmouth
Posts: 1,222
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
When you post your dyno chart and chris Zelinsky and James start talking **** to eachother on it

Name:  oYxrHfe.jpg
Views: 36
Size:  176.4 KB
Old 10-05-2015, 06:21 AM
  #58  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
63 Nova SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-12-12
Location: Indiana
Posts: 5,485
Received 316 Likes on 296 Posts
Originally Posted by Canadia
When you post your dyno chart and chris Zelinsky and James start talking **** to eachother on it
That whole post makes me want to quit the "gang". It's really not a group of adult cobalt enthusiasts. Guys like that who commented affirm my belief in why cobalts get no respect because of how most of those guys react.
Old 10-06-2015, 01:18 PM
  #59  
Senior Member
 
Terminator2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-25-08
Location: Florida
Posts: 12,478
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Canadia
When you post your dyno chart and chris Zelinsky and James start talking **** to eachother on it

Those two can go jump off a bridge. The world would be a better place.
Old 10-06-2015, 01:25 PM
  #60  
Senior Member
 
Terminator2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-25-08
Location: Florida
Posts: 12,478
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Another note I just sent Adrian (Colodude18) an E-85 tune for that 08 that did the stock tune dyno run on the Mustang dyno. Hopefully he will get to run it on that same dyno with the new tune. 223 whp stock let us see what it makes tuned on E-85. Apparently every car I tune dynos on happy dynos I guess 😂😂😂.
Old 10-06-2015, 01:40 PM
  #61  
Senior Member
 
Terminator2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-25-08
Location: Florida
Posts: 12,478
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Cobalt_Daddy
If it's the trailer dyno that usually goes to car shows in HRM it's the same dyno i did my car on. numbers seem to be where they should be on mine. it must pull hard!
268 whp GMS1 on the same dyno as the OP which is on the low normal end for dynojet numbers on GMS1 car (seen as high as 283 whp on a dynojet) so it seems to not read as high as everyone seems to think.
Old 10-06-2015, 01:44 PM
  #62  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
no_ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-28-14
Location: Ft. Myers
Posts: 2,113
Likes: 0
Received 58 Likes on 54 Posts
Originally Posted by Terminator2
268 whp GMS1 on the same dyno as the OP which is on the low normal end for dynojet numbers on GMS1 car (seen as high as 283 whp on a dynojet) so it seems to not read as high as everyone seems to think.
It also would depend on elevation level right? Like down here in Florida the oxygen is more dense so we're prone to making more power?
Old 10-06-2015, 01:54 PM
  #63  
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
ECaulk's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-19-10
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 26,574
Received 836 Likes on 733 Posts
Those adjustments are made in the calculated power.
Old 10-06-2015, 02:52 PM
  #64  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
breds2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-25-11
Location: Cape Cod, MA
Posts: 4,611
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Those numbers are whack. ive seen two LNF's on a dynojet and then both went on a mustang next weekend. 294dj--->251md 329dj---->286md
Old 10-06-2015, 04:34 PM
  #65  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Canadia's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-07-12
Location: Dartmouth
Posts: 1,222
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by no_ss
It also would depend on elevation level right? Like down here in Florida the oxygen is more dense so we're prone to making more power?
well were right at sea level here.
Old 10-06-2015, 06:08 PM
  #66  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
colodude18's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-12-10
Location: Greater Denver Area, Colorado
Posts: 2,692
Received 171 Likes on 142 Posts
Originally Posted by ECaulk
Those adjustments are made in the calculated power.
^^this. The Weather Correction Factor adjusts the numbers for temperature, humidity and barometric pressure. That's why the numbers "with WCF" I posted are so much higher; we're at 5,400 feet altitude, meaning the car makes less power here than at sea level. That's also how we can get away with running full E85 on stock turbo without any fueling mods
Old 10-06-2015, 06:18 PM
  #67  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
colodude18's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-12-10
Location: Greater Denver Area, Colorado
Posts: 2,692
Received 171 Likes on 142 Posts
Originally Posted by Terminator2
Another note I just sent Adrian (Colodude18) an E-85 tune for that 08 that did the stock tune dyno run on the Mustang dyno. Hopefully he will get to run it on that same dyno with the new tune. 223 whp stock let us see what it makes tuned on E-85. Apparently every car I tune dynos on happy dynos I guess 😂😂😂.
I will make sure he dynoes at the same place afterwards. We'll have 5280Cobalts pitch in on the dyno run if we have to
Old 10-06-2015, 10:20 PM
  #68  
Senior Member
 
Cobalt_Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-19-09
Location: Windsor NS
Posts: 7,705
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
yep we're at sea level here
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
taintedred07
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
32
05-28-2022 03:47 AM
KMO43
Front Page News
33
01-12-2016 12:01 AM
Jesse
Parts
15
10-13-2015 09:32 PM
KMO43
Featured Car Showcase
37
09-27-2015 08:53 PM
OPCrer
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
3
09-27-2015 08:11 PM



Quick Reply: Term2 Tune 91octane LNF record?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:42 AM.