Originally Posted by OniMirage

The future is here and the mount is Micro. Look at Nikons attempt and failure to get into the game with the 1! series. Sony jumped into mirrorless and while popular in the tech crowd their design and interface doesn't really appeal to everyone so on that front people have been slow to adopt. Canon has no presence. Panasonic and Olympus are making a killing everywhere in the world and the only resistance to it is in the US where we still think bigger is better. Olympus' next camera which I wet myself thinking about, the OMD EM-5 is insane and comparable to any aps-c based camera in all aspects, dynamic range, noise, resolution, sensitivity. Over on dpreview there are lots of converts showing up, stories of people that have long been faithful to their brand selling off all their Canon and Nikon equipment to get into the Micro scene. The thing shoots 9fps, has the fastest auto focus system in the world when used with Micro lens', built in anti dust wave filter, worlds only 5 axis in body mechanical image stabilization for photos 'and' video, built in EVF @120hz, the list just goes on. Couple that with the ability to use some of the world sharpest and best lens' ever made from the past to present in addition to adapters for all other mounts and a magnesium alloy weather proof body ... for only $1k??? Seriously the future is here and it's Micro, even I would have to buy into the new system though luckily for me I own lens' from the 4/3 line so I am directly compatible with an adapter.

Originally Posted by drewbroo

These are all great and everything but you have to use a very fast lens to get good low light performance out of a smaller sensor. (With todays sensors) I know they have better ones on the way... but yeah right now pickings are slim for micro 4/3ds

Originally Posted by BPacak

took a few pics today, first time taking pics of water. and i went to this cemetery in the woods from the early 1800's thats supposed to be really haunted, it was creepy as hell during the day haha.

Originally Posted by ForsakenOutlaw57

@ BPacak love the water it's a great effect. But it almost looks like the bridge is out of focus did some wind shake the camera on you? Hate when that happens really because I love the silky water effect myself. The gravestones have some great coloring to them also. Good job.

Originally Posted by Jhezzy

thank you to everyone who has helped me. I just ordered my Nikon D3100 for $534 comes with alot of goodies with it! =) i cant wait for it to get here. i also got with it trick photography and special effects so im hoping it will help me since im a beginner at this!

Originally Posted by OniMirage

Most likely just the optics, the bridge is in the corner which would typically make it softer than the remaining parts of the image. In addition, to get the depth of field shown a higher f number would be used which would lead into diffraction causing even more softness.

Originally Posted by OniMirage

Most likely just the optics, the bridge is in the corner which would typically make it softer than the remaining parts of the image. In addition, to get the depth of field shown a higher f number would be used which would lead into diffraction causing even more softness.

Originally Posted by BPacak

yeah pretty sure thats what happend, anything to help it out or no?

and i messed around with light painting once when i first got my camera, havent since though.

[IMG]http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y273/HEROO123/_DSC0002-1.jpg[IMG]

Originally Posted by BPacak

yeah pretty sure thats what happend, anything to help it out or no?

and i messed around with light painting once when i first got my camera, havent since though.

Originally Posted by DSmastery

gti reflection off build, quite stunning

whole picture is smooth

Originally Posted by drewbroo

Thanks. Its actually a reflective upside down pyramid. If you are ever in AZ, I can point you to where it is.