War Stories Post your racing wins. CobaltSS.net does not support or encourage street racing. Be smart and take it to the track.

To the White SS/TC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 21, 2009 | 10:54 AM
  #1  
fballman1987's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-03-06
Posts: 6,793
Likes: 0
From: New Tripoli, Pennsylvania
To the White SS/TC

Who raced the blue STi on the PA turnpike heading towards Philly Saturday night..

its stock.


also why the ricer fly by after i beat you twice?

proof a stock TC will not beat a STi from a roll, it was at least 2-3 cars and i shut down pretty fast it would have pulled more too. Dead Zen is my witness as he was in the car
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2009 | 11:03 AM
  #2  
rallycobalt06's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-01-06
Posts: 19,671
Likes: 0
From: Newark, DE
pwnd
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2009 | 11:04 AM
  #3  
06_SIC_SS's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: 09-14-08
Posts: 3,424
Likes: 0
From: Akron, Ohio
ricer fly by FTW! lol
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2009 | 11:06 AM
  #4  
cgrammer's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-08-07
Posts: 5,792
Likes: 0
From: Far from you
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2009 | 11:25 AM
  #5  
daythecountrydied21's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 10-08-08
Posts: 1,734
Likes: 0
From: Shitsylvania
Originally Posted by fballman1987
Who raced the blue STi on the PA turnpike heading towards Philly Saturday night..

its stock.


also why the ricer fly by after i beat you twice?

proof a stock TC will not beat a STi from a roll, it was at least 2-3 cars and i shut down pretty fast it would have pulled more too. Dead Zen is my witness as he was in the car
all in the driver my friend .
stock ones = no problem for me with all cooling but meth/basic bolts/off my custom tune and on the gms2 map....then again s/c and turbo powerbands are different..
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2009 | 11:26 AM
  #6  
madlion's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-26-08
Posts: 864
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
stis are pigs shoulda bought an evo 9. you ought to be committed for dating a fatbish. chubby chaser
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2009 | 11:28 AM
  #7  
rallycobalt06's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-01-06
Posts: 19,671
Likes: 0
From: Newark, DE
:facepalm:

STi > SS/TC

all day, any day.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2009 | 11:29 AM
  #8  
ecotecturbo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-06-09
Posts: 2,073
Likes: 0
From: Mn
wow u beat a stock tc from a roll do you want me to bake you a cake?
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2009 | 11:33 AM
  #9  
madlion's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-26-08
Posts: 864
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
sti's arent better. first off they are different platform. so you cant compare. secondly

8:22.85 Chevrolet Cobalt SS Turbo (2008)
8:22 BMW M3 E46 Horst von Saurma Sport Auto (12/2000)
8:22 BMW M Coupe E36/8 Horst von Saurma Sport Auto (10/1998)
8:24 Subaru Impreza (2004)

oh yeah and their engines suck. shoulda bought an evo
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2009 | 11:40 AM
  #10  
tREBs's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-16-06
Posts: 6,540
Likes: 0
From: World
Originally Posted by ecotecturbo
wow u beat a stock tc from a roll do you want me to bake you a cake?
well a cake would be just lovely.
your logic is very skewed btw, it beat a 260hp FWD car, with very little drivetrain loss, an STI will put about the same numbers to the ground, with A LOT of drivetrain loss being AWD, not to mention the gearing on an STI is alot shorter then the SS/tc, and is designed more for 0-~80 mph acceleration.

or are you downplaying your SS/TC? its a good race, give credit where credit is due. The ss/tc is no joke.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2009 | 11:42 AM
  #11  
madlion's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-26-08
Posts: 864
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
ok lets get down to the nitty gritty what year sti? you are about to get schooled kid
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2009 | 11:43 AM
  #12  
rallycobalt06's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-01-06
Posts: 19,671
Likes: 0
From: Newark, DE
well that's like your opinion man.

not everyone ehumps the evo.

and those times you posted.... those are with professional drivers. this is the real world, we aren't professionals. the OP is a good comparision because everyone on here is ehumping the SS/TC and claiming that they can beat certains cars.... well this is proof that a STi pulled a SS/TC like a bitch in a roll race. AWD + roll race = no bueno in most cases. if this was a dig... it would of been ALOT worse for the SS/TC.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2009 | 11:45 AM
  #13  
madlion's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-26-08
Posts: 864
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
what year sti bish
he said sti>ss t/c
you cant just measure dig racing thats why i brought out the track times.
and fyi if it wasnt a 04 then it was slower then what is posted above
the 04s were regarded as the best stis produced
so what year are we comparing??
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2009 | 11:47 AM
  #14  
tREBs's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-16-06
Posts: 6,540
Likes: 0
From: World
Originally Posted by madlion
sti's arent better. first off they are different platform. so you cant compare. secondly

8:22.85 Chevrolet Cobalt SS Turbo (2008)
8:22 BMW M3 E46 Horst von Saurma Sport Auto (12/2000)
8:22 BMW M Coupe E36/8 Horst von Saurma Sport Auto (10/1998)
8:24 Subaru Impreza (2004)

oh yeah and their engines suck. shoulda bought an evo
funny! I don't see the Evo above the STI on the list...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N%C3%BCrburgring_lap_times

in fact the STI is 9 spots ahead of the evo 9... what your list includes is the base impreza
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2009 | 11:48 AM
  #15  
rallycobalt06's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-01-06
Posts: 19,671
Likes: 0
From: Newark, DE
d-bag



i keep forgetting the year of his STi, i know it's the "hawk eye" version, i want to say 06... but i'm not 100% on this.

and i know who you are talking to here, but i ain't no kid, son.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2009 | 11:52 AM
  #16  
09whteSSpssssh's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-06-09
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
From: damascus, MD
Sounds to me like one driver beat another, ive put the 2 cars on a stock sti from a 25 roll to 100. I was also stock. Both cars driven well are a good race from a low roll.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2009 | 11:53 AM
  #17  
madlion's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-26-08
Posts: 864
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
stock for stock the 04 sti was quick but when you start modifying it the evo is a better platform to work with.
evo always handled better then the sti btw
80-120 roll t/c would win all day

Last edited by madlion; Sep 21, 2009 at 11:55 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2009 | 11:58 AM
  #18  
damien's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 04-12-09
Posts: 1,739
Likes: 0
From: NJ
lmao who the **** does 80-120 rolls these aren't supras.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2009 | 12:00 PM
  #19  
BradSi's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-24-07
Posts: 7,789
Likes: 0
From: Cincy
In for the lulz. Idiots. Just was proven a stock sti will rape a stock tc. He RAPED him. BAD.

Originally Posted by damien
lmao who the **** does 80-120 rolls these aren't supras.
Haha troof.

Last edited by BradSi; Sep 21, 2009 at 12:29 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2009 | 12:03 PM
  #20  
rallycobalt06's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-01-06
Posts: 19,671
Likes: 0
From: Newark, DE
roll races are a drivers race. so the "80-120 roll t/c would win all day" comment you made is very inaccurate.

but roll races are for people who can't launch, IMO.

oh hell.... i own a ss/sc, my ***** weaksos anyways, i dont know what i'm talking about.

Originally Posted by damien
lmao who the **** does 80-120 rolls these aren't supras.
this made me lol

Last edited by rallycobalt06; Sep 21, 2009 at 12:03 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2009 | 12:07 PM
  #21  
Smus's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 07-12-09
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
From: Mankato MN
Corvette > both cars.

There, argument solved.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2009 | 12:08 PM
  #22  
madlion's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-26-08
Posts: 864
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
sti 06

0 - 60 (sec): 5.4
1/4 Mile (sec @ mph): 13.6 @ 100
30 - 0 (ft): 28.7
60 - 0 (ft): 114.5
Slalom (mph): 68.1
Turning Circle (ft), curb-to-curb: .93

ss t/c

slalom 72.40 mph
60-0 braking 117.00 ft.
1/4 mile 13.6 sec. @105 (rounded up for you)
0-60 5.50 sec.
skidpad 0.92 g.

here are some quick stats i just wanted to point out the slalom speed
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2009 | 12:09 PM
  #23  
BradSi's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-24-07
Posts: 7,789
Likes: 0
From: Cincy
Originally Posted by Smus
Corvette > both cars.

There, argument solved.
this. win statement.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2009 | 12:11 PM
  #24  
SLoW SHO's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 11-29-06
Posts: 1,935
Likes: 0
From: CT
Originally Posted by madlion
sti 06

0 - 60 (sec): 5.4
1/4 Mile (sec @ mph): 13.6 @ 100
30 - 0 (ft): 28.7
60 - 0 (ft): 114.5
Slalom (mph): 68.1
Turning Circle (ft), curb-to-curb: .93

ss t/c

slalom 72.40 mph
60-0 braking 117.00 ft.
1/4 mile 13.6 sec. @105 (rounded up for you)
0-60 5.50 sec.
skidpad 0.92 g.

here are some quick stats i just wanted to point out the slalom speed
lol did you just type these "stats" up? Hahahaha
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2009 | 12:15 PM
  #25  
madlion's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-26-08
Posts: 864
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
dig races are driver's races so thus your statement is inaccurate. how hard is it to launch at 5500 in an sti. way more difficult to launch the ss t/c properly. when you are going around a track you very rarely encounter a dead stop making launching not as big of a deal. while in the quarter mile the sti may have a small advantage go to a track with two good drivers and i will tell you its a drivers race. so this sti>t/c is bs

nah got them from edmunds c&d and cobaltss.net actually i meant my dash hawk

Last edited by madlion; Sep 21, 2009 at 12:15 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:43 PM.