Forum Jump Gallery Social Groups VBgarage Videos Chat Link To Us Decals Site Map Contact Us
Cobalt SS Network Forums

The Cobalt SS Network is the leading resource for all Chevy Cobalts and related Delta
platform cars. Registered users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!

Supporting Vendor Index | Vendor Forums

Go Back   Cobalt SS Network > Marketplace > Supporting Vendors > N2MB Racing

N2MB Racing N2MB Racing is a supporting vendor.
Contacts: phrozen ; jay@n2mb

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-20-2008, 02:24 PM   #1
hatrickstu
Senior Member
 
Join Date: 05-03-05
Location: Ar-kan-sas
Member #: 1666
Posts: 14,517
Images: 27
Check out my gallery  Check out my vbgarage 

My street/track review of WOT box

Ok so I had the box in with V2.3 firmware on it yesterday and got a pretty good impression of the box. First off, at 2,400 i can get it too hook pretty well on street tires. Now the track part.

1000 FOOT TRACK

This was on 18 inch BFG dr's. Started with the 2step at 2,600, hit hard then bogged. 2,800, hit hard then bogged. 3,000 hit hard, then started a light spin, stuck with this. Oddly enough, all of these runs were 2.1 60's. Not great, but it def. showed potential. Best I managed was a 2.07, with the box at 3,000 and a very quick clutch release. I could have easliy reached 2.0 or below, but after the initial hit the car would start a light hop/ wheel spin. Could have been track conditions, or the spring spacers i wasnt used to (after watching vids, they need to be extended more, still squating), so I will just keep woking on that.

However, something was really off with my traps in the front half of the track. All night they were 3-4 mph slower than usual. I went back and looked at nearly identical 60 foots, and all my times from last night are 3-4mph off and 1-3 tenths off. Almost like the car was pulling timing on the front half because of the boost so low or something. Really weird stuff. At first I figured the timers may have been off, but then everyone else's were dead on what they usually are. Any reason the computer would be pulling timing or reducing power for some reason?

Nearly all my times in the 2.11 and lower area are 11.0-10.9 passes, and i couldnt get below an 11.1 all night. It wasnt just the air though because my times in the back half were what they should have been.

Also, I had the WOT shift set on Auto and the shifts seemed really slow on video, so on the way home i turned it onto the fastest setting and it SEEMED to be faster.

Overall im very happy with the box, and it is insanely easy to program at the touch of a button. However, I really need to find out why my times were suffering so much on the front half.

Here are all the slips, im car 8014, missed 2-3 on 5th pass-













And here is the video from the night, car sounds NASTY from up front-

http://videos.streetfire.net/video/H...box_172652.htm

(video is still being filtered or whatever)
__________________
hatrickstu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2008, 02:30 PM   #2
JohnsRallyYellowSS
Junior Member
 
Join Date: 09-05-06
Location: Albemarle, N.C.
Member #: 10076
Posts: 401
Check out my gallery  Check out my vbgarage 

Why the fuck is it only 1000'???? Why not a 1/4 mile?
__________________
DSLSJA Member

2.9" NHERBST Pulley
GMPP stage 2
NOS 55 shot
ZZPerformance Header/DP 1.75" Primaries
Ingals TD
SCBLKRL tuned

ASE Certified P2 Parts Specialist
JohnsRallyYellowSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2008, 02:36 PM   #3
jeremie
Banned
 
Join Date: 09-13-06
Location: kansas city
Member #: 10337
Posts: 2,352
Images: 17
Check out my gallery  Check out my vbgarage 

probably cause of scott kalitta's crash

the nhra changed the tracks for the top fuel cars to 1000ft instead of 1320. i dunno why it would effect other cars though, it was supposed to be for top fuel cars.
jeremie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2008, 02:37 PM   #4
hatrickstu
Senior Member
 
Join Date: 05-03-05
Location: Ar-kan-sas
Member #: 1666
Posts: 14,517
Images: 27
Check out my gallery  Check out my vbgarage 

no no no, its only 1000 foot and has always been that way. way back in the day NHRA was already considering going to 1000 foot tracks, so there are a few around. it has stayed that way for insurance and space reasons. no 1/4 tracks in AR, now back on topic
__________________
hatrickstu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2008, 02:41 PM   #5
LS6Rally
Senior Member
 
Join Date: 11-09-07
Location: Taunton MA
Member #: 21272
Posts: 1,203
Images: 3
Check out my gallery  Check out my vbgarage 

yea NHRA reduced it to 1000 ft l;ast week. IHRA is still runnign 1320 as far as i know

goo to know that product is effective. now you gotta try it on the faster setting an see if there is a diff.
__________________
2006 SS 2.4L VVT 5spd.
K&N Typhoon-TWM Short Throw-Hurst Knob-Smoked Tails-
ARK Strut Tower Brace-SS/SC A Pillar-Autometer Oil Press.-
Sportlines-Antenna Chop-Billet Oil Cap - LED 3rd Brake Light - 3K Fogs -4300 HID Kit -

Last edited by LS6Rally; 07-20-2008 at 02:41 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
LS6Rally is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2008, 02:41 PM   #6
hatrickstu
Senior Member
 
Join Date: 05-03-05
Location: Ar-kan-sas
Member #: 1666
Posts: 14,517
Images: 27
Check out my gallery  Check out my vbgarage 

again, i dont give a shit about the 1000 foot debate, take it elsewhere
__________________
hatrickstu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2008, 02:45 PM   #7
JERMzSS
Senior Member
 
Join Date: 07-02-06
Location: Van Buren, Arkansas
Member #: 8429
Posts: 1,460
Images: 35
Check out my gallery  Check out my vbgarage 

very strange Stu......you think the PCM is picking up the WOT box somehow?
__________________
JERMzSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2008, 02:47 PM   #8
hatrickstu
Senior Member
 
Join Date: 05-03-05
Location: Ar-kan-sas
Member #: 1666
Posts: 14,517
Images: 27
Check out my gallery  Check out my vbgarage 

Quote:
Originally Posted by JERMzSS View Post
very strange Stu......you think the PCM is picking up the WOT box somehow?
i honestly dont know man, really odd though.
__________________
hatrickstu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2008, 02:51 PM   #9
JERMzSS
Senior Member
 
Join Date: 07-02-06
Location: Van Buren, Arkansas
Member #: 8429
Posts: 1,460
Images: 35
Check out my gallery  Check out my vbgarage 

Quote:
Originally Posted by hatrickstu View Post
i honestly dont know man, really odd though.
I would try to find out what the humidty was yesterday. Then find some of your other slips take the date and maybe you can look up what the weather was some where online. I remember you were traping really close to 99MPH and with it being really hot I can understand a mph or 2 but not as much as you lost.
__________________
JERMzSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2008, 02:53 PM   #10
hatrickstu
Senior Member
 
Join Date: 05-03-05
Location: Ar-kan-sas
Member #: 1666
Posts: 14,517
Images: 27
Check out my gallery  Check out my vbgarage 

video is up and working

Quote:
Originally Posted by JERMzSS View Post
I would try to find out what the humidty was yesterday. Then find some of your other slips take the date and maybe you can look up what the weather was some where online. I remember you were traping really close to 99MPH and with it being really hot I can understand a mph or 2 but not as much as you lost.
i have only gone 99 once, but now that you say it, on some of the "faster" runs, my trap was only off about 2 mph in both the 1/8 and 1000, more testing seems to be needed. oh darn, more track time
__________________

Last edited by hatrickstu; 07-20-2008 at 02:53 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
hatrickstu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2008, 02:57 PM   #11
phrozen
Supporting Vendor
 
Join Date: 07-01-08
Location: Philadelphia
Member #: 27484
Posts: 348
Check out my gallery  Check out my vbgarage 

One thing you might want to try is doing runs with the 2-step launch and without it. You may need to launch at a higher RPM to really make a difference. That might require slicks. I'll let Jay comment more on this. I've never 2-step launched a car at the track, but Jay does it all the time...

Also, you should easily be able to tell if the no-lift shift is helping by doing a run with no-lift shifting and a run with regular shifting. There should be a big difference.
phrozen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2008, 02:57 PM   #12
JERMzSS
Senior Member
 
Join Date: 07-02-06
Location: Van Buren, Arkansas
Member #: 8429
Posts: 1,460
Images: 35
Check out my gallery  Check out my vbgarage 

Quote:
Originally Posted by hatrickstu View Post
video is up and working



i have only gone 99 once, but now that you say it, on some of the "faster" runs, my trap was only off about 2 mph in both the 1/8 and 1000, more testing seems to be needed. oh darn, more track time
LOL good luck
__________________
JERMzSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2008, 03:01 PM   #13
hatrickstu
Senior Member
 
Join Date: 05-03-05
Location: Ar-kan-sas
Member #: 1666
Posts: 14,517
Images: 27
Check out my gallery  Check out my vbgarage 

Quote:
Originally Posted by phrozen View Post
One thing you might want to try is doing runs with the 2-step launch and without it. You may need to launch at a higher RPM to really make a difference. That might require slicks. I'll let Jay comment more on this. I've never 2-step launched a car at the track, but Jay does it all the time...

Also, you should easily be able to tell if the no-lift shift is helping by doing a run with no-lift shifting and a run with regular shifting. There should be a big difference.
oh i did, and my times were pretty much dead on

i def. like the product alot though. i see my times becoming MUCH more consistent and my R/T's being pretty low.

after looking back on it, this is the worst air ive run in this year. so it may be a premature thing to assume that its killing me downlow.

in all honestly phrozen, it took me probably 3-4 passes before i was comfortable with taking my eye off the tach in the staging area. it takes alot of trust in a product, and i have it in the box now. makes my staging procedure WAY less complicated-

before-
burnout
pre stage
raise revs to 3k
bump car into staging
ebrake
check revs

after-
burnout
prestage
stage
lay foot on floor

after FTW
__________________

Last edited by hatrickstu; 07-20-2008 at 03:05 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
hatrickstu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2008, 03:12 PM   #14
phrozen
Supporting Vendor
 
Join Date: 07-01-08
Location: Philadelphia
Member #: 27484
Posts: 348
Check out my gallery  Check out my vbgarage 

Quote:
Originally Posted by hatrickstu View Post
oh i did, and my times were pretty much dead on

i def. like the product alot though. i see my times becoming MUCH more consistent and my R/T's being pretty low.

after looking back on it, this is the worst air ive run in this year. so it may be a premature thing to assume that its killing me downlow.

in all honestly phrozen, it took me probably 3-4 passes before i was comfortable with taking my eye off the tach in the staging area. it takes alot of trust in a product, and i have it in the box now. makes my staging procedure WAY less complicated-

before-
burnout
pre stage
raise revs to 3k
bump car into staging
ebrake
check revs

after-
burnout
prestage
stage
lay foot on floor

after FTW
Cool. I noticed from watching the vid that you are supercharged, so there probably won't be huge time gains for you. The gains will be more of consistency and ease of shifting. Plus the shifts should be easier on your transmission...

So, it might take some practice and making the comparison runs on the same night to be able to see the difference with an SC car.
phrozen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2008, 03:20 PM   #15
D4u2s0t
Senior Member
 
D4u2s0t's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-18-05
Location: North Jersey
Member #: 4589
Posts: 17,939
Images: 10
Check out my gallery  Check out my vbgarage 

this will most benefit those with a turbo. supercharged cars probably won't get any faster times from this, or if they do, it will most likely be pretty minimal. i'm sure the launch control is easier once you get used to it though, so maybe it will help with more consistant 60's
D4u2s0t is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2008, 04:09 PM   #16
hatrickstu
Senior Member
 
Join Date: 05-03-05
Location: Ar-kan-sas
Member #: 1666
Posts: 14,517
Images: 27
Check out my gallery  Check out my vbgarage 

the consistency has already proved itself. 4-6 runs were less than a 1/10 apart. and one of the ones not was a missed shift
__________________
hatrickstu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2008, 05:25 PM   #17
jay@n2mb
Supporting Vendor
 
Join Date: 07-03-08
Location: FLORIDA
Member #: 27551
Posts: 53
Check out my gallery  Check out my vbgarage 

a few more times with the box set low and you will be back ahead of what you were before.the the sc car you still want it quick even though you instantly have boost you still want to keep the car from transfering weight between shifts its easy to burn them on streets.its hard to compare it right now because you just started doing something completely different than what you are used to.as far as consistency though....thats awesome that you laid down all within a tenth..for a manual trans thats impressive
jay@n2mb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2008, 06:01 PM   #18
hatrickstu
Senior Member
 
Join Date: 05-03-05
Location: Ar-kan-sas
Member #: 1666
Posts: 14,517
Images: 27
Check out my gallery  Check out my vbgarage 

thanks man, and yea now that ive been reflecting on the runs. i will really need better weather to guage my times. love the box though! i dont have have to worry about the weight transfer with the spring spacers though
__________________
hatrickstu is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:38 PM.


vBulletin copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©Cobalt SS Network, Enthusiast Networks LLC - All posts are the opinions and copyright of the original authors and must be referenced with a link.
This site is not affiliated nor endorsed by General Motors. Chevy Cobalt and related trademarks are the property of GM.