Why can't people believe an ss/tc runs 13.5 stock?

[USMCFieldMP]

Originally Posted by NarutoDF

if this is so then why on earth was my G5 GT able to beet the V6 Mustang by almost a full second on an 8th mile track. Mind you i dont have a quarter mile close by to me. Also the G5 GT i had had at the most at the time about 160WHP id say roughly. I was a 5speed of coarse. Mustang was quite possibly a auto which could definately explain it not to mention the V6 is for chicks who wanna look hot no offense to any females out there lol. Same goes for the 5.7L hemi charger. I raced one on that same track and i lost with the G5 GT but by like half a second. He should have beet that car by way more then that.

This is probably one of the dumbest posts that I've read this year.

[Joemann892]

x2 ^^

[cobaltR]

Originally Posted by USMCFieldMP

This is probably one of the dumbest posts that I've read this year.

x3......and it keep it rolling...I've been LMAO with all the lastest comments.....

[1BADSS/SC]

Originally Posted by NarutoDF

if this is so then why on earth was my G5 GT able to beet the V6 Mustang by almost a full second on an 8th mile track. Mind you i dont have a quarter mile close by to me. Also the G5 GT i had had at the most at the time about 160WHP id say roughly. I was a 5speed of coarse. Mustang was quite possibly a auto which could definately explain it not to mention the V6 is for chicks who wanna look hot no offense to any females out there lol. Same goes for the 5.7L hemi charger. I raced one on that same track and i lost with the G5 GT but by like half a second. He should have beet that car by way more then that.

hmmm... I think someone needs to dump out his newb juice sippy cup and start reading up on cars.

Originally Posted by USMCFieldMP

This is probably one of the dumbest posts that I've read this year.

AND THE YEAR IS YOUNG!

I wonder what fun lies later in the year!

[revhigh18]

spy vid with skenapse incerk0013r pippping

http://videos.streetfire.net/video/2...ious_65705.htm

[1BADSS/SC]

What are they doing in this vid???!!

http://videos.streetfire.net/video/s...ell_151461.htm

AM I THE ONLY ONE THAT SEES THEM???

[revhigh18]

dude is that a fkoewj turbo upgreyed

no that vid has to be the stayge tew

[car_guy_09]

Originally Posted by USMCFieldMP

This is probably one of the dumbest posts that I've read this year.

Agreed

[04redline0124]

Originally Posted by NarutoDF

if this is so then why on earth was my G5 GT able to beet the V6 Mustang by almost a full second on an 8th mile track. Mind you i dont have a quarter mile close by to me. Also the G5 GT i had had at the most at the time about 160WHP id say roughly. I was a 5speed of coarse. Mustang was quite possibly a auto which could definately explain it not to mention the V6 is for chicks who wanna look hot no offense to any females out there lol. Same goes for the 5.7L hemi charger. I raced one on that same track and i lost with the G5 GT but by like half a second. He should have beet that car by way more then that.

Yo shit is fast then yo. M4d props to your fastness.

Noob. Go read some car and driver and let us know how bad you can beat a lambo lp640

[slowstang]

Man, this jumped alittle off topic.

It seems that no matter who I run into they tell me i'm full of shit. It can be at the track, class, local car hangout, other forums or whatever but none of them think a car with roughly 240-250whp can run mid 13s. Everyone that has gone for a ride in my car knows its quick...even my brother who has a 12.9 01 Mustang Gt says it feels faster then his car.

Like it was said before the SRT4 crowd doesn't credit it because a magazine hasn't ran the time. But, if they ran a 14.4 in an nsrt4 the same people would be crying and saying they don't know how to drive. C+D hit 104mph in a sedan...while showing its potential it also showed the lack of driving/traction.

[MARIN007]

slowstang, forget them man. In the end the cobalt community knows what you did and we have your back.

[Eric1987]

Originally Posted by slowstang

Man, this jumped alittle off topic.

It seems that no matter who I run into they tell me i'm full of shit. It can be at the track, class, local car hangout, other forums or whatever but none of them think a car with roughly 240-250whp can run mid 13s. Everyone that has gone for a ride in my car knows its quick...even my brother who has a 12.9 01 Mustang Gt says it feels faster then his car.

Like it was said before the SRT4 crowd doesn't credit it because a magazine hasn't ran the time. But, if they ran a 14.4 in an nsrt4 the same people would be crying and saying they don't know how to drive. C+D hit 104mph in a sedan...while showing its potential it also showed the lack of driving/traction.

Why dont you just show them your timeslip?

[1BADSS/SC]

Originally Posted by slowstang

Man, this jumped alittle off topic.

It seems that no matter who I run into they tell me i'm full of shit. It can be at the track, class, local car hangout, other forums or whatever but none of them think a car with roughly 240-250whp can run mid 13s. Everyone that has gone for a ride in my car knows its quick...even my brother who has a 12.9 01 Mustang Gt says it feels faster then his car.

Like it was said before the SRT4 crowd doesn't credit it because a magazine hasn't ran the time. But, if they ran a 14.4 in an nsrt4 the same people would be crying and saying they don't know how to drive. C+D hit 104mph in a sedan...while showing its potential it also showed the lack of driving/traction.

it isnt so much the driver skill, its the fact that only 2 ran 13's like that, and u trapped much higer than people who couldnt break 13's, which doesnt make any sense at all.

So as I said u guys are either full of shit, or u have factory freaks. Thats the only explanation because I can guarantee that if u sit down in a different SS/Tc you wont run that time again.

[Terminator2]

Originally Posted by 1BADSS/SC

it isnt so much the driver skill, its the fact that only 2 ran 13's like that, and u trapped much higer than people who couldnt break 13's, which doesnt make any sense at all.

So as I said u guys are either full of shit, or u have factory freaks. Thats the only explanation because I can guarantee that if u sit down in a different SS/Tc you wont run that time again.

I believe it is a good combination of driver skill and good track ( traction ) conditions. He could duplicate that run in another TC. How is it that some were able to get a 215-225 whp NSRT-4 to run in the 13s stock but a 240-250 whp same weight cobalt that gets better traction than a stock NSRT-4 cannot run 13s stock. Hell, the magazines wer able to run 13.8 at 104 with TC they could not get a NSRT-4 to run faster than 14.2. Your arguement holds no water get out of this thread.

[revhigh18]

Cobalt SS T/C > Every other stock turbo 4cyl

[1BADSS/SC]

Originally Posted by Terminator2

I believe it is a good combination of driver skill and good track ( traction ) conditions. He could duplicate that run in another TC. How is it that some were able to get a 215-225 whp NSRT-4 to run in the 13s stock but a 240-250 whp same weight cobalt that gets better traction than a stock NSRT-4 cannot run 13s stock. Hell, the magazines wer able to run 13.8 at 104 with TC they could not get a NSRT-4 to run faster than 14.2. Your arguement holds no water get out of this thread.

Obviously u have no clue about cars, and what a factory freak is. Why dont u do some research before u post? Perfect examples of GM factory freaks are the LS engines. Some dyno more than others stock for stock. It happens all the time. There are variations in EVERY CAR. Just because theyre made on an assembly line doesnt mean every car is going to dyno EXACTLY the same. Some run stronger than others out of the box. If u knew ANYTHING about trap speed and racing u would see that NOT ONLY DID THEY GET THE BEST TIMES, BUT THEY ALSO NETTED THE HIGHEST TRAPS.

Do u know what trap speed means? Trap speed goes DOWN the better u launch. So riddle me this. WHY THE FUCK DO THEY HAVE THE HIGHEST TRAP SPEED AND BEST TIMES? They have stronger cars.

Secondly, u show me a magazine article since u like to magazine race about the SS/TC running a 13.8@104. Car and driver got a 14.2 @ 102, MT got a 13.9 @ 102.

I will also attest that I made a 13.9 @ 106.6 stock. U see that trap speed? Thats good for mid to low 13's. Ya know what would happen if I actually got bettter than a 2.3 60'? My quarter mile time would have looked something like 13.6@104, or 13.3@102. The 106.6 shows that I got no traction off the line, then made up for it later.

Originally Posted by revhigh18

Cobalt SS T/C > Every other stock turbo 4cyl

i hope this is a joke

[revhigh18]

no dude hahaha i was serious and what is your sig?

[1BADSS/SC]

Originally Posted by revhigh18

no dude hahaha i was serious and what is your sig?

U know ur not supposed to drink the bong juice even though its tastey...

My sig? Well, my cars name is frankenstein, so I just kind of plopped a cool looking face in my sig.