How much hp do you think an LNF 2.0 thats naturally aspirated would make to the flywheel?

bump

 

160 maybe?

 

thats a good guess!^^^^

 

wouldnt it be less then a 2.2 which is 148

 

id think its easily capable of the 150-180 range

 

yeah im thinking 100hp from the turbo, right

 

The 2.2 isn't a performance-minded motor... The internals are weaker, it doesn't use direct injection, etc.

 

VVT and DI would help it to get more hp

 

If I had to take a wild guess, I'd say 170-190hp.

I'm basing this off of the fact that the internal dimensions are similar to the LSJ, and although it would be naturally aspirated, it would still have direct injection and cam phasing on its side to make up for the difference.

I've thought about this question before myself. I contemplated getting a copy of HP Tuners in the future and set the commanded parameters to atmospheric/sea level pressure to play around with it and see. Although it wouldn't be truly naturally aspirated still, you could at least get a feel for what the engine can do on its own.

Edit: The more I think about it and read the good thoughts some of you have, the more I think it would be lower.

 

stock boost is 16lbs... each psi says to be 10hp

so 100 hp

 

i wouldnt think so, but you might be right

 

Thats being tuned for a turbo i assume that if its tuned for the motor it will be much more!

 

I like the thought process. I'd add a bit more to it though I think.

 

Not only is it a 2.0... but it is like a 9.2:1 Compression Ratio, iirc.

It wouldn't be much. I'd say less than 150hp.

Hahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahaha....


No.

With your genius HP guessing equation... that would mean that 10psi from a stock turbo... and 10psi from a GT42R would make the same amount of power. Ummmm... Okay.

 

120-140hp seem fair?

 

There is really only one way to find out... and that would be to do it. There are WAY too many factors that go into it. Like, Cams... how well will the stock cams work in a N/A situation... manifolds, etc, etc.

 

i totally forgot about direct injection and vvt in the LNF.

the camaro is n/a and it makes 304 hp out of a 3.6L
and vvt adds some power like in the accord and cobalt 2.4.

so im thinking it probably makes about 180

i wonder if somebody has tried it?

 

perfect example of why ppl dont get on .net anymore.... 2 many *********

 

i think it would be stupid to do, so i can only guess that no one has tried it

USM is your senior, and you are to respect him as such

 

...Yea it's because of the ********* with the correct answers/idea, not the ones that blast B.S. and pull incorrect info outta there anus.

 

the OP states "How much hp do you think an LNF 2.0 thats naturally aspirated would make to the flywheel?"

key word THINK i stated how much I would THINK it would be... and there isnt CORRECT info because no1 would know the correct answer buddy, there is no exact number

 

thats MY job

 

But if what you "think" isn't based on any technically true merit what you "think" really isn't worth much is it?...

 

and it starts again

 

FWIW, buddy of mine ran his stock LSJ on a dyno with the boost bypass done wrong, valve stayed open and the car made 0 boost. Put down 130 somthing. I'd assume the LNF would be slightly higher with the DI and VVT, but how they would react to just pulling boost out of the stock tune, I wouldn't know. IF the engine was specifically tuned for NA, then you can't really compare, as the tuning would make the difference.

I'd guess 150-160hp, if everything was left stock but boost was disabled. Assuming the car would still complete the pull.