2.2L L61 Performance Tech 16 valve 145 hp EcoTec with 155 lb-ft of torque

Went to the track

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-23-2007, 07:59 PM
  #1  
New Member
Thread Starter
 
NoMoreLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-21-07
Location: Schererville, IN
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Went to the track

Hey guys, this is my first post here.

Took the car to the track for my f-body club's rental. I no longer own a Camaro but I'm still a member/mod on their board. Car is a bone stock stripper '07 LS with a 5sp. I'll just list the times up to the best pass. Times got progressively better as I experimented with launch RPMs and shift points.

15.92 @ 87.50 (2.48)
15.55 @ 88.29 (2.32)
15.59 @ 88.68 (2.33)
15.49 @ 88.94 (2.33)
15.59 @ 88.16 (2.28)
15.40 @ 89.51 (2.28)

The rest of the passes were done during bracket racing (which I won), so on some of the passes I was on the breaks and they are not worth listing. The passes were made in early November at Cordova, IL. The air was very good and DA was around sea level. How do these runs compare with other stock cars? I did better that I thought I would, would have been happy with a 15.7.
Old 12-23-2007, 08:01 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
SS_Ry's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-29-06
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 4,132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
uhhh....are you sure that its not a 2.4? im not too sure what the 2.2's are running....but that seems a little low to me....maybe im wrong
Old 12-23-2007, 08:04 PM
  #3  
New Member
Thread Starter
 
NoMoreLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-21-07
Location: Schererville, IN
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The air was very good and I consider myself a pretty good driver. The car is an LS with a 2.2.
Old 12-23-2007, 08:09 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
outtamymind's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-21-07
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 16,180
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
ya thats pretty damn good for a 2.2 seeing as most stock 2.4's are running those times.
Old 12-23-2007, 09:23 PM
  #5  
New Member
 
Thatsit's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-03-07
Location: Arlington Heights/Palatine (Lake Zurich) IL
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what were your launch and shift point RPMs? (if you remember)
Old 12-23-2007, 09:46 PM
  #6  
Member
 
durka's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-12-07
Location: Oregon
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2.4 are not too much faster than 2.2.. not sure how much 2.4 ss weighs, but my car weighs 2750lb with me in it and 1/4 tank of gas.
Old 12-23-2007, 09:47 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
outtamymind's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-21-07
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 16,180
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
ya but on average the 2.4's are roughly a second faster then the 2.2's
Old 12-23-2007, 09:48 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
hatrickstu's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-03-05
Location: Ar-kan-sas
Posts: 15,395
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by durka
2.4 are not too much faster than 2.2.. not sure how much 2.4 ss weighs, but my car weighs 2750lb with me in it and 1/4 tank of gas.
no way bro, that scale was off. that is unless you took lots of **** out of it
Old 12-23-2007, 09:57 PM
  #9  
Member
 
SpeedJunkies07LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-26-07
Location: Talbot Co. Maryland
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yeah mine is around 3000-3200 and i dont have anything taken out and thats dry whieght
Old 12-23-2007, 10:08 PM
  #10  
New Member
Thread Starter
 
NoMoreLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-21-07
Location: Schererville, IN
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Thatsit
what were your launch and shift point RPMs? (if you remember)
If I remember right, I was leaving at about 4k, slipping the clutch but letting it up quickly, there is a fine line between bog and spin. I found that the best shift point (not surprisingly), was right before redline 6300-6400ish. I tried short shifting at 6k but slowed.

Originally Posted by outtamymind
ya but on average the 2.4's are roughly a second faster then the 2.2's
So you are saying there are stock SS's that regularly run in the 14's? I highly doubt that.

Last edited by NoMoreLS1; 12-23-2007 at 10:08 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 12-23-2007, 10:28 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
outtamymind's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-21-07
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 16,180
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
no i was saying that on average the 2.4's are running the times he put in the first thread. im running those times. so when i said the 2.4's are on average a second faster then the 2.2's i meant that the 2.2's were in the 16's. thats what i meant by that. also this is based on complete stock times.
Old 12-23-2007, 10:31 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
hawlyns711's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-19-07
Location: tax free NH
Posts: 1,406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
timeslip?
Old 12-23-2007, 10:33 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
outtamymind's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-21-07
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 16,180
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
for who?

here's my time slip for a stock 2.4L in calgary, alberta. due to altitude and all the like i run a 16.6 up here but if i were to run down in some of the tracks you guys run i would be roughly a second faster due to the change in altitude and density. oh and im car 438

Old 12-23-2007, 11:08 PM
  #14  
New Member
Thread Starter
 
NoMoreLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-21-07
Location: Schererville, IN
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by hawlyns711
timeslip?
I'll post it up tomorrow after work. My battery in my camera is dead and I don't have a scanner, so I can't right now.
Old 12-23-2007, 11:13 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
pjk91's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-07-05
Location: San Pedro/PV
Posts: 1,733
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Those are definitely some solid times on a 2.2. Good for you man. To the guy that posted a slip...your 60s are way high man. 2.4 & 2.6 isn't an impressive 60. I'm not bashing, just informing. I have a disgusting 60ft average as well. I think with a 2.49 when I was stock netted me a 15.8@89. It will show in the sig.
Old 12-23-2007, 11:43 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
outtamymind's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-21-07
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 16,180
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
ya i know by the time i started getting the hang of quick shifting the race season up here came to an end this year was my first year at the drag track so i still have alot of practicing ahead. that and i kept losing traction going from 1st to 2nd
Old 12-23-2007, 11:52 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Brandon97Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-13-04
Location: Indiana
Posts: 3,394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice times but doesn't surprise me. Some base 03+cavaliers with the 2.2 5-speed were running low 15's stock, but they weight a few hundred less.
Old 12-23-2007, 11:59 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
killah_thug08's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-04-07
Location: Canada
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by NoMoreLS1
If I remember right, I was leaving at about 4k, slipping the clutch but letting it up quickly, there is a fine line between bog and spin. I found that the best shift point (not surprisingly), was right before redline 6300-6400ish. I tried short shifting at 6k but slowed.

So you are saying there are stock SS's that regularly run in the 14's? I highly doubt that.
is that a ss/sc that ran 15.9 with you?
Old 12-24-2007, 12:05 AM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
outtamymind's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-21-07
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 16,180
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
ya it was an ss/sc he had a bad launch and left his ac on full blast so he bogged it a little off the tree. he's a buddy of mine and i laughed so hard at him when he told he that he had left the ac on lol.
Old 12-24-2007, 12:05 AM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
Helltime's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-01-07
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 1,082
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by outtamymind
no i was saying that on average the 2.4's are running the times he put in the first thread. im running those times. so when i said the 2.4's are on average a second faster then the 2.2's i meant that the 2.2's were in the 16's. thats what i meant by that. also this is based on complete stock times.

https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/drag-racing-52/official-cobalt-1-4-mile-list-65389/

All depends on driver and elevation (that and auto or manual).
Looks like some good times though. I can't wait to go to Cordova one of these times and see what my 07 LS will run
Old 12-24-2007, 12:09 AM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
outtamymind's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-21-07
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 16,180
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
ya thats why i always say roughly or an estimate as there are always some variable's to screw around with the times namely driver, elevation and air density.

that and the 06 ss/na are slightly faster then the 07 ss/na's. i have an 07 and my brother has an 06 and we always raced each other and he was consistently .3 seconds faster then i was.
Old 12-24-2007, 03:15 AM
  #22  
New Member
 
CobaltTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-16-07
Location: Belvidere, IL.
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good times out of a stock LS. My buddies 04 Cavalier 2.2 ran consistant 15.2's at Byron Dragway so for a couple hundred pound heavier car thats not to bad.
Old 12-24-2007, 10:20 AM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
IonNinja's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-29-05
Location: AZ
Posts: 7,926
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thats the fastest "stock" 2.2 I've ever seen...

with weight reduction and the right location I guess its possible, 2.2's out here are running mid 16's.
Old 12-24-2007, 04:00 PM
  #24  
New Member
Thread Starter
 
NoMoreLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-21-07
Location: Schererville, IN
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here is my crappy picture of my time slip, sorry its so hard to read. I'll have to scan it at work Wednesday, maybe it will come out better.



Later in the day I tried taking the spare and jack out but by that time the air got worse and I went no faster. In the spring maybe I'll try taking out the seats and whatnot to trim some weight and try again.

On my Camaro I even went so far as to take out the bumper supports but I won't be doing that with this car.
Old 12-24-2007, 04:32 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
outtamymind's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-21-07
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 16,180
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
ya the altitude and density here in calgary sucks ***** so we get a little screwed in our times but ya good times by the way.


Quick Reply: Went to the track



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:26 PM.