![]() |
Anyone see Matt's prototype dual injector setup?
|
Don't have facebook. Post here
|
ok. so you have a link to that? not all of us are 16 year old chicks
|
I heard about it. But haven't seen it yet. I talked about doing this for a big turbo a year and a half ago before we were able to raise the fuel pressure. Don't have facebook to see the pics.
|
that is awesome. how come you guys kept the stock manifold though. why not sheetmetal?
|
Originally Posted by haymakercobalt
(Post 5294988)
Don't have facebook. Post here
Haha, just messin' with ya. |
|
Looks nifty. Info?
|
When will it be for sale and is it tuneable with hp tuners?
|
very nice. split second box right? Thats what we used. how is the 2nd set being controlled on this set-up?
|
neat design
|
Looks complicated! Thank god there are brilliant and innovative people in this world that can figure all this stuff out for those of us that are less imaginative!
|
i already posted this in the lounge
|
Originally Posted by tomj77
(Post 5296097)
i already posted this in the lounge
|
Originally Posted by csementuh
(Post 5297320)
Link?
i like zzps post better though |
Old hat. BaldTurboFreak has been doing this for YEARS on the solstices.
I worry about the aggregation of fuel on the opposite side of the intake mani though. Regardless, it will do the job. |
Originally Posted by mkriebs
(Post 5299275)
Old hat. BaldTurboFreak has been doing this for YEARS on the solstices.
I worry about the aggregation of fuel on the opposite side of the intake mani though. Regardless, it will do the job. |
Originally Posted by BleedBlue09
(Post 5299398)
i may not post much, but do you ever have anything positive to say? I get it you think your parts are the best, but it doesnt mean you have to be a douche to zzp or others...honestly I wouldve bought a few things from you guys but your attitude towards zzp in other threads made me not....
I never once brought up werks, on this subject. So, I would appreciate if you wouldn't be so quick to take this post simply as negativity. Its simply me looking for information on the setup, not bashing. |
Originally Posted by BleedBlue09
(Post 5299398)
i may not post much, but do you ever have anything positive to say? I get it you think your parts are the best, but it doesnt mean you have to be a douche to zzp or others...honestly I wouldve bought a few things from you guys but your attitude towards zzp in other threads made me not....
|
Originally Posted by mkriebs
(Post 5299416)
I never once brought up werks, on this subject. So, I would appreciate if you wouldn't be so quick to take this post simply as negativity. Its simply me looking for information on the setup, not bashing. |
Originally Posted by mkriebs
(Post 5299416)
What did I say that was wrong there, sir? All I said is that BTF has done it for years, meaning, its been done, and its been proven. then I raised an issue that has been raised in numerous different platforms that I follow (many of the issues being raised on hondas), when running secondary injectors. The issue being fuel aggregation on the opposite side of the intake manifold. This is a real problem, and I would like to see if ZZP has a solution to that. Fuel aggregation is a real problem when adding secondary injectors to ANY intake manifold, whether it be ours, or a Skunk2 on a honda.
I never once brought up werks, on this subject. So, I would appreciate if you wouldn't be so quick to take this post simply as negativity. Its simply me looking for information on the setup, not bashing. |
Originally Posted by BleedBlue09
(Post 5299438)
Im just saying lets help each other instead of the back and forth crap between people, Im sorry if I took your post wrong.....Just seemed like you were knocking this new thing their trying is all!
|
As of right now, I am running my car with the stock turbo and E85. I was able to put down 355whp sae on the DI injectors only(2800psi). I then installed the port fuel injectors and put down exactly the same power with the DI injectors providing ~2/3 of the fuel and the port injectors providing ~1/3. This was good news since I was afraid that we might lose a little power due to the port injection not being able to utilize the benefits of direct injection. My theory is that above 25% duty cycle, DI gains are quickly diminishing. In other words, the shortened pulses of the DI system are helping at least as much as the port injection is hurting.
|
Originally Posted by Matt M
(Post 5299553)
As of right now, I am running my car with the stock turbo and E85. I was able to put down 355whp sae on the DI injectors only(2800psi). I then installed the port fuel injectors and put down exactly the same power with the DI injectors providing ~2/3 of the fuel and the port injectors providing ~1/3. This was good news since I was afraid that we might lose a little power due to the port injection not being able to utilize the benefits of direct injection. My theory is that above 25% duty cycle, DI gains are quickly diminishing. In other words, the shortened pulses of the DI system are helping at least as much as the port injection is hurting.
|
Originally Posted by mkriebs
(Post 5299560)
This is what I was interested in. Thats what I like to see! I was contemplating doing the same thing, so I could run E85. Are the secondaries pretty well angled into the intake port, then? They look to be angled, but hard to tell HOW angled, ya know?
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:58 AM. |
© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands