2.0L LNF Performance Tech 260hp and 260 lb-ft of torque Turbocharged tuner version.

Cams and NBS

Old Jul 7, 2020 | 06:11 AM
  #1  
AG305's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 07-18-17
Posts: 206
Likes: 7
From: MS
Cams and NBS

hey guys. so i dynoed my car finally and made 460whp. im very happy with the car and it made more or less the exact power i was expecting given my setup. my question is... whats next??

i was thinking of throwing in some cams, springs and all that good stuff with neutral balance shafts and an ati damper so i can rev higher and wanted to know what type of gains i could expect from doing so from what you guys have seen?

my setup is zfr7163 and full E85. with my current tune im reving to 6800. all stock internals. where can/should i rev to once i put in the cams and stuff?

i was reading around on here and saw something about reving passed 74 or 75 is useless on an LNF because of the cam phasers or something along those lines but im not sure if that was referring to stock cams/springs or if that was the case with upgraded cams and stuff also. is that still true and is there a mod/fix i can do? my ultimate goal is to break the 500whp mark and rev to 8K.

another question is, WHAT cams? i was thinking the ZZP Z2's but im definitely willing to go much more aggressive if those wont be enough for my end goal. maybe a stage 3?
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2020 | 07:05 AM
  #2  
blu3_v1p3r's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: 09-24-06
Posts: 4,535
Likes: 196
From: Virginia Beach, VA
Nice. Good numbers. Stock trans? and what clutch are you using? Also what are you using to run full e85 (upgraded HPFP, fuel cams larger injectors)? I don't know much about the neutral balance shafts or cams and things.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2020 | 08:50 AM
  #3  
AG305's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 07-18-17
Posts: 206
Likes: 7
From: MS
LSJ 4.05 trans, gmpp clutch, opel injectors and zzp hpfp
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2020 | 08:56 AM
  #4  
blu3_v1p3r's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: 09-24-06
Posts: 4,535
Likes: 196
From: Virginia Beach, VA
and you run full E all the time? and do you test it everytime you fill up? We only have 2 places that have e85 and both are on the Naval bases local to me, so i have access to them and I would think the supply come from the same place, so I would imagine both stations are roughly the e content. I know you guy were talking about the e content readers in the other thread.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2020 | 09:39 AM
  #5  
AG305's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 07-18-17
Posts: 206
Likes: 7
From: MS
yep! full E all the time. daily driven. i test every now and then if its been awhile or if i ever go to a gas station ive never been to. i also have the zeitronix eca-2 installed so it lets me know the current content in the car (highly recommended). the gas stations i go to are very very consistent and good quality. used to run E47 on the stock turbo and would test each and every single time i would fill up so i got to see its consistency.
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2020 | 09:10 PM
  #6  
AG305's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 07-18-17
Posts: 206
Likes: 7
From: MS
bump for any info on the cams
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2020 | 09:38 PM
  #7  
63 Nova SS's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 06-12-12
Posts: 5,466
Likes: 316
From: Indiana
I wish I could remember because it's been awhile but I think if you are running everything through the stock computer you will have cam phase limits. Like you say I believe it's past 7,200. There has to be some posts on here about it.
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2020 | 11:54 AM
  #8  
colodude18's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 01-12-10
Posts: 2,692
Likes: 171
From: Greater Denver Area, Colorado
I'm running the ZZP Stage 3 cams with their 82# valve springs and neutral balance shafts. I believe that package should be good to 8500 rpms. I've only gone to 82-8300 since that's all I need at the road track to stay in 4th on the straight (~140mph). I'm running the 4.45 trans so higher revs at that speed than yours. I'm not sure what the numbers are the the Stage 2 cams...
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2020 | 07:06 PM
  #9  
AG305's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 07-18-17
Posts: 206
Likes: 7
From: MS
Originally Posted by colodude18
I'm running the ZZP Stage 3 cams with their 82# valve springs and neutral balance shafts. I believe that package should be good to 8500 rpms. I've only gone to 82-8300 since that's all I need at the road track to stay in 4th on the straight (~140mph). I'm running the 4.45 trans so higher revs at that speed than yours. I'm not sure what the numbers are the the Stage 2 cams...
do you drive the car on the street or is it just a track car? hows the driveability with the stage 3s? debating between those and the stage 2s. i want whichever would hit the 500 mark easier with the 7163.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2020 | 07:52 AM
  #10  
AG305's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 07-18-17
Posts: 206
Likes: 7
From: MS
bump for info

still debating on the stage 2 or 3s. whats the efficiency range of the 7163 anyways? does it die off at/by 8K? is it even worth reving it that high if it does indeed peak before?

what kind of general ballpark hp gains have you guys seen from going nbs and cams? 30? 40?
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2020 | 12:51 PM
  #11  
USMCFieldMP's Avatar
Rattlesnake Race Shop
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 06-08-06
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 410
From: Fort Worth, TX
Neutral balance shafts are like a <10hp gain, iirc? I think that's what was claimed in the build book, at least.

They're not worth it on their own, but if you're going to be tearing into the timing size anyway to do cams, they can be worthwhile, I suppose. I can't remember if they can be changed with the engine in the car though - I'm sure someone else can chime in on that. I guess, if you're crafty enough, you should be able to loosen the mounts and lower the engine enough to change them.

I have no input on the cams - I haven't run any of them. There are potential issues associated with high revving with upgraded valve springs and cams - (MrBelvedere addressed this in a thread a long while back). Essentially amounts to our lash adjusters sucking. BUT, at these power levels, everything is a risk that you should be prepared for. Like the transmission.

Here's the compressor map for the EFR7163: http://www.turbos.borgwarner.com/fil...R%207163-F.pdf - I don't think you have anything to worry about with it.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2020 | 02:52 PM
  #12  
AG305's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 07-18-17
Posts: 206
Likes: 7
From: MS
yeah i believe i have to drop the engine a bit to take the balance shafts out. no worries. these will be going in along with cams and a new damper so definitely not just on their own. just trying to break that 500 mark!
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2020 | 02:59 PM
  #13  
colodude18's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 01-12-10
Posts: 2,692
Likes: 171
From: Greater Denver Area, Colorado
FYI, stage 3 cams are not readily available. ZZP only had like 5 or 6 sets made back in the day. I have one of them. I've heard anecdotally of people that ordered straight from COMP Cams but I'm not sure if that is still an option. As far as driveability, there is no real noticeable difference. Mine had some lope early on using just ZZP's tune tables but ECaulk refined the tune and even that is gone now. Main reason I got the Stage 3's was so I could rev over 8K which saved me a shift into 5th at the end of the straight at the circuit. I do not daily drive mine.
As for neutral balance shafts, it is my understanding that their main function is to prevent excessive vibrations at higher RPMS (7K+). I seriously doubt whether they provide any power gains. I got mine from ZZP. Hope that helps!
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2020 | 03:21 PM
  #14  
AG305's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 07-18-17
Posts: 206
Likes: 7
From: MS
thanks for that! so yeah im currently in talks with zzp about which of the cams to run for my setup. they have a stage 3 for me if i decide on it over the stage 2. stage 3 lobes are timed different and would mainly be for better timing at high rpm (7500+) according to them. also said the 7163 is maxed out before 75 so its not worth reving it to 8k anyways. better to use the stage 3s if i were running a S257 or something. power up to 75 is identicle on both cams.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2020 | 04:01 PM
  #15  
USMCFieldMP's Avatar
Rattlesnake Race Shop
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 06-08-06
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 410
From: Fort Worth, TX
Originally Posted by colodude18
As for neutral balance shafts, it is my understanding that their main function is to prevent excessive vibrations at higher RPMS (7K+). I seriously doubt whether they provide any power gains. I got mine from ZZP. Hope that helps!
I seem to recall that they eliminate vibrations lower in the RPM band, and that it's recommend to change them if you'll be revving high into the RPM band.

And the gains are from having to spin less mass... which makes me think that maybe the gain isn't with the NBS, but with the delete.

I'll have to check my old books real quick to verify that though.

EDIT: https://zzperformance.com/blogs/impo...balance-shafts


It’s a common misconception that the balance shaft is used to balance the engine, when it actually creates a vibration to counter act the vibration you would feel at low engine RPMs.
[...]
Mainly, they do their work at idle and low engine speeds, where vibrations are felt the most. Being out of balance is bad for performance; however this trade-off is worth it for the average consumer. The real problem comes in when you want to use the engine at high speeds. Recall the math from above and how the forces relate to rpm. A factory balance shaft has a radius just over an inch, making the counter weight a lot more than an ounce, which in turn creates terrible engine shake. For high rpm engine operations, it is essential to eliminate the factory balance shafts, or run neutral shafts (which can spin at any speed without causing vibrations).
They claim their NBS weigh less than stock too, which makes a big difference when spinning the engine at 8k rpm.

Originally Posted by AG305
also said the 7163 is maxed out before 75 so its not worth reving it to 8k anyways.
For peak power, that'd be true. But if your power/torque peaks at 7500, how far does it drop up to 8k? And how much power/torque are you making right after shifting at each of those points? Running it out to 8k, even with the turbo running out of breath, will likely be a faster car than just shifting at 7500. You'll likely have a higher average torque over the rpm range that your running.

​​​​​​​Do you have the dyno chart?

Last edited by USMCFieldMP; Jul 20, 2020 at 04:26 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2020 | 04:16 PM
  #16  
colodude18's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 01-12-10
Posts: 2,692
Likes: 171
From: Greater Denver Area, Colorado
Originally Posted by USMCFieldMP
I seem to recall that they eliminate vibrations lower in the RPM band, and that it's recommend to change them if you'll be revving high into the RPM band.

And the gains are from having to spin less mass... which makes me think that maybe the gain isn't with the NBS, but with the delete.

I'll have to check my old books real quick to verify that though.

EDIT: https://zzperformance.com/blogs/impo...balance-shafts




They claim their NBS weigh less than stock too, which makes a big difference when spinning the engine at 8k rpm.
Yeah that's what I said (or meant, at least) NBS prevent vibrations at higher revs. Stock balance shafts cancel out vibrations in lower revs. And I get the rotating mass difference. Just not sure how much difference it makes. My dyno numbers didn't change massively after upgrading to my ported Stage 3 head, although we weren't necessarily trying to hit higher numbers, mostly optimizing the balance between timing and limiting heat generation...
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2020 | 04:28 PM
  #17  
USMCFieldMP's Avatar
Rattlesnake Race Shop
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 06-08-06
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 410
From: Fort Worth, TX
Gotcha. I totally missed the "neutral" part in your original post. Though you were saying the OE balance shafts cancelled out vibrations at High RPM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sS07NA
2.4L LE5 Performance Tech
10
Sep 6, 2014 06:30 AM
flaminace
2.2L L61 Performance Tech
47
Aug 28, 2013 12:59 PM
07_Red_SS/SC
2.0L LSJ Performance Tech
6
Feb 1, 2012 04:19 PM
HunterKiller89
General Cobalt
4
Feb 4, 2009 10:03 PM
spooler
2.0L LSJ Performance Tech
0
Apr 27, 2006 11:10 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:27 AM.