Knightwolf

Ok... I don't see anything like this around here, although I remember guys doing 60-100 times iirc. I'm just curious for comparison sake, what do you guys have for 30-100 times, preferably logged by HpT going from Pedal position 100% until 100 is reached... this way it's an accurate time. Just wondering what the differences are between all of the different turbos are and where the tune I just put on this "stockish" car will end up. I don't think it's fast, but our DA is around 3500' and without NLS, I got 9.8 seconds as a time. Just wondering if I'm off the pace or not.. Also, Maf is a ****hair from 33 lbs/min but of course, it hasn't been relocated. Somebody told me that without a relocate, it isn't accurate. Basically, I'm wondering if I should turn it up more or not Lol

Thanks

Devin86

30-100 depends on driver mod and power put to the road spinning isnt winning. 60-100 mostly anybody can stomp 3rd gear and not mess it up lol The tune also makes big difference with each turbo. These cars are not x=y. X is mods and Y is power. Just gotta race and see who wins in a speed contest if ur going from 30-100 lol the tune matters on 60-100 same turbo vs same turbo. That's probably the reason there is not a "list of this"

Knightwolf

Ok.. well.. damn lol.. a NLS would decrease that time, I don't really care.. just wanted to see some ball park numbers.. so it's 60-100 then eh?
So on same log, with a 2-3 Lift shift, it's 8.1 seconds Lol.. not ideal, I know.
What about the lbs/min issue? Any clarification or calculation if it is in fact inaccurate?

Devin86

33 per min is good I think 35 is like hardcore tuned with meth some ppl might be higher but like I said tune matters alot so flow rate will be different. Not a flow pro tho so wait for sombody wiser to pop in lol😅

ECaulk

iTrader: (6)

As long as your fuel trims are close (+-2%) your maf should be damn close up top. Not sure how a relocate would make it more accurate...

Knightwolf

Fuel trims swing a lot where I live.. they'll be close at one point in time of the day, and 30 minutes later, they could be out almost as much as +/- 5. As for Maf lbs/min, Idk.. there's this other tuner here and he says the number in the stock location is inaccurate. It's not something that is important to know, but if that's true, then a Maf relocate would make sense. That being said, I'm starting to think he's full of **** since this car I just tuned is in fact hitting 33 lbs/min under WoT. Maybe he was just butthurt because I was getting 54 up top with the Zfr... Idk.. just speculation.

T-Man

iTrader: (3)

Using MAF or VE flow to determine your cars performance is the wrong way to go about it.

60-100, V-Dyno/dyno or track results are your best bet

63 Nova SS

iTrader: (3)

33-34 on a stock ko4 probably is about right. The + or r is around 37-38.5 with just the slightly bigger wheel. They pale in comparison to zfr's

tomj77

iTrader: (2)

Zfr, instant, but that's on ice

colodude18

iTrader: (4)