2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

Brfps

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 1, 2010 | 04:05 PM
  #1  
BlackMagic's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 09-24-09
Posts: 848
Likes: 3
From: South Dakota
Brfps

ok so i'm getting the itch to pulley down again but I am already pushing it for fuel so I think I'm going to go with zzp's BRFPS (boost reference fuel pressure system). I was wondering if anyone has tried it or how far I could drop the pulley after?
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2010 | 10:28 AM
  #2  
BlackMagic's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 09-24-09
Posts: 848
Likes: 3
From: South Dakota
buummpp
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2010 | 10:32 AM
  #3  
coopercharge's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 01-27-10
Posts: 1,233
Likes: 0
From: Omaha, Nebraska
Switch to premium pump gas or 100 octane unleaded race gas then pulley down you wont have to push out as much fuel if you switch from e85 and you may possibly want to go with a single pass or dual pass with option b setup.
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2010 | 10:38 AM
  #4  
BLAZIN07SS's Avatar
I'm too JDM for you
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: 06-05-07
Posts: 16,357
Likes: 1
From: Miami, Florida
Originally Posted by coopercharge
Switch to premium pump gas or 100 octane unleaded race gas then pulley down you wont have to push out as much fuel if you switch from e85 and you may possibly want to go with a single pass or dual pass with option b setup.
switch to premium fuel and lose a ton a power? no way.


i am not familiar with how zzp's kit works exactly but ott's return style kit is tried and proven. they are also releasing their new return style kit which is going to be very affordable
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2010 | 10:53 AM
  #5  
BlackMagic's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 09-24-09
Posts: 848
Likes: 3
From: South Dakota
on zzp's site the full return system will be an option but it says "There are no benefits performance wise to doing this" so I am thinking why spend double the price on ottp's kit if there is no benefit?
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2010 | 11:06 AM
  #6  
csementuh's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: 12-20-07
Posts: 3,055
Likes: 0
From: Jeannette, PA
Originally Posted by BlackMagic
on zzp's site the full return system will be an option but it says "There are no benefits performance wise to doing this" so I am thinking why spend double the price on ottp's kit if there is no benefit?
The benefit is reliability and consistency. All cylinders should be getting equal fuel as opposed to the stock returnless style system. OTTP's is only like ~$375 and it is available now.
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2010 | 11:08 AM
  #7  
BLAZIN07SS's Avatar
I'm too JDM for you
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: 06-05-07
Posts: 16,357
Likes: 1
From: Miami, Florida
Originally Posted by BlackMagic
on zzp's site the full return system will be an option but it says "There are no benefits performance wise to doing this" so I am thinking why spend double the price on ottp's kit if there is no benefit?
ryan@zzp runs a custom return style kit making 586whp. just sayin'
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2010 | 11:09 AM
  #8  
1badBlueberrySC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-23-08
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
There is plenty of benefits for it.... no number 4 starvation... plus with E85 you need a helluva lot more fuel than with pump gas.


OTTP's kit is tried and proven on a ton of cars... all making well over 350+ whp... and all still driving!
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2010 | 03:09 PM
  #9  
BlackMagic's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 09-24-09
Posts: 848
Likes: 3
From: South Dakota
hey I am just repeating what is directly on their site. just doesn't seem logical if there is no benefit to spend even more money i'm sure almost everyone knows what i mean there. plus I like zzp better then ottp I have had problems with ottp in the past and I would rather just avoid another problem so I will stick to what has never failed me which is zzp.
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2010 | 03:31 PM
  #10  
csementuh's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: 12-20-07
Posts: 3,055
Likes: 0
From: Jeannette, PA
Several people have listed the benefits. You won't get more 'performance' out of a properly fueled setup by using another proper fuel setup. You can however get increased reliablility out of the system however if one is able to provide a more constant flow. There are lots of things that will 'work' and lots of things that are 'safer'. My votes on the return style.
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2010 | 03:54 PM
  #11  
BLAZIN07SS's Avatar
I'm too JDM for you
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: 06-05-07
Posts: 16,357
Likes: 1
From: Miami, Florida
Originally Posted by BlackMagic
hey I am just repeating what is directly on their site. just doesn't seem logical if there is no benefit to spend even more money i'm sure almost everyone knows what i mean there. plus I like zzp better then ottp I have had problems with ottp in the past and I would rather just avoid another problem so I will stick to what has never failed me which is zzp.
i'm just saying what i saw on ryans race car right in front of me
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2010 | 04:58 PM
  #12  
BlackMagic's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 09-24-09
Posts: 848
Likes: 3
From: South Dakota
I was just curious to my understanding the only difference is that the fuel returns the biggest improvement is that the fuel psi is increased which both do so this is why I don't understand what the difference is and was hoping for someone to shed some light.
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2010 | 05:11 PM
  #13  
Stiner's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-06-06
Posts: 992
Likes: 0
From: Pontypool, Ontario
Just go brfps
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2010 | 05:32 PM
  #14  
skatin_boarding's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-26-09
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, MN
You have to hook it up like option 2 and its the same thing as a rsfs, just doesnt return the fuel.
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2010 | 05:46 PM
  #15  
BlackMagic's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 09-24-09
Posts: 848
Likes: 3
From: South Dakota
yea kinda figured I mean if the return was better in any way I think zzp would say so I mean its more money and in turn more profit for them
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2010 | 07:38 PM
  #16  
skatin_boarding's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-26-09
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, MN
I think im going to try it and if I dont like it just buy the extra fuel line and make it into a return style. Its not like I am going to need tons more of fuel. Im in the same boat as you. I just want to run a 2.7 or 2.75" and be able to rev to 7200.
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2010 | 08:19 PM
  #17  
BlackMagic's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 09-24-09
Posts: 848
Likes: 3
From: South Dakota
yup I know exactly what you mean it feels so wrong to shift when it is still pulling so hard. I want to run the 2.7. I'm going to try the brfps as well thanks for the help to man
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2010 | 09:34 PM
  #18  
freakta's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 04-22-07
Posts: 5,575
Likes: 0
From: milton ma
ive got it going in this week coming up.... you can run it more than one way, just have to tune differently for each setup
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2010 | 10:55 AM
  #19  
BlackMagic's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 09-24-09
Posts: 848
Likes: 3
From: South Dakota
In option 1 I still don't understand why you wouldn't have to tune for it that way?
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2010 | 07:19 PM
  #20  
skatin_boarding's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-26-09
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, MN
I think its because the ve table doesnt support fuel after 17psi. This is why people use the maf scale after that.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2010 | 05:45 PM
  #21  
WSFrazier's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-17-05
Posts: 5,844
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Gonna bump this. Any of you guys run the BRFS yet? How you like it?
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2010 | 06:06 PM
  #22  
skatin_boarding's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-26-09
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, MN
Its not on their website anymore. I am not forsure why though.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2010 | 06:08 PM
  #23  
WSFrazier's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-17-05
Posts: 5,844
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
It's on there, if you search for it. Says out of stock but you can still order it.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2010 | 06:25 PM
  #24  
skatin_boarding's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-26-09
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, MN
oh i guess i didnt search for it. It just wasnt were it normally was.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2010 | 07:38 PM
  #25  
ebristol's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 04-15-07
Posts: 5,457
Likes: 3
From: WI
Originally Posted by 1badBlueberrySC
There is plenty of benefits for it.... no number 4 starvation... plus with E85 you need a helluva lot more fuel than with pump gas.
Unless you can prove this you need to stop posting it. It is just a theory.

I think the problem with old #4 is cooling related which was one of changes made with the Gen II ecotec block.

It seems like #1 likes to go first on the LNF with an entirely different fuel system but what do I know?

<sarcasm>
#1 must be getting starved of fuel!
</sarcasm>

Oh. And here is a good thread.

http://www.ionforums.com/forums/perf...s-vs-rsfs.html

Last edited by ebristol; Jul 19, 2010 at 07:38 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:19 AM.