New High flow lower manifold
thats what im saying the blower doesnt make 12.5psi its 12.5 psi where the gauge reads from inside the intake somewhere where it has all gone to ****.
does anyone honestly believe a gen 5 blower can be this bad? no one else with these blowers needs a cooling system. i just think gm should have thought it through a little more. but i guess if it wasnt made for the cobalt then i cant complain, we just got stuck with a bad product
does anyone honestly believe a gen 5 blower can be this bad? no one else with these blowers needs a cooling system. i just think gm should have thought it through a little more. but i guess if it wasnt made for the cobalt then i cant complain, we just got stuck with a bad product
Laminovas are one of the most effecient methods of cooling. Not flow, especially the design stated. Our IATs are already through the roof how they stand stock under WOT. Also the car wasnt intended for back to back runs for most of their customers. More like, spirited driving every now and then which it does quite nicely. Hence why it is aluminum and not copper. If the car's IATs were through the roof under a constant state of 150-170 then obviously copper would be solution. Highest conductor always wins vs the constant state of heat. But since our IATs fluctuate so much (stock) then the aluminum can dissipate the heat quicker than copper.
I think the best way your going to get around this is a larger aluminum core but to mesh it with something else that will do the cooling like the killer chiller perhaps. If your cool enough, you dont need that restriction. Many people with prior cooling mods can take this in to account.
Looking at it from a PSI side and calling it a bad design doesnt really tell us much since the engine's calculated CFM needed vs calculated CFM the blower delivers wasnt in to account. Now im only going off of memory here but when I did the calculations on a stock system....
The LSJ could take in to account 650ish CFM
The blower could deliver 850ish CFM
So that is 200 CFM the LSJ wastes. Which is basicly a 75% effeciency rating ONLY in regards to CFM. We can clean that up a bit in theory but we still have to take in to account opening up exhaust, colder/warmer air, AFR, spark, ...etc. Kinda hard to convert all of these little maths in to HP and ive got souvenier shopping to do today since im doing the good ol vacation deal.
All the stuff i typed could be off, go ahead and correct me if im wrong with the numbers since im doing this off memory guys, but it is basicly correct from an engineering standpoint.
its a bit more complex than that. They didnt do a bad job at all. If i was GM id be on the "safe" side too. However, tweaks can be made to improve the designability of it all.
Laminovas are one of the most effecient methods of cooling. Not flow, especially the design stated. Our IATs are already through the roof how they stand stock under WOT. Also the car wasnt intended for back to back runs for most of their customers. More like, spirited driving every now and then which it does quite nicely. Hence why it is aluminum and not copper. If the car's IATs were through the roof under a constant state of 150-170 then obviously copper would be solution. Highest conductor always wins vs the constant state of heat. But since our IATs fluctuate so much (stock) then the aluminum can dissipate the heat quicker than copper.
I think the best way your going to get around this is a larger aluminum core but to mesh it with something else that will do the cooling like the killer chiller perhaps. If your cool enough, you dont need that restriction. Many people with prior cooling mods can take this in to account.
Looking at it from a PSI side and calling it a bad design doesnt really tell us much since the engine's calculated CFM needed vs calculated CFM the blower delivers wasnt in to account. Now im only going off of memory here but when I did the calculations on a stock system....
The LSJ could take in to account 650ish CFM
The blower could deliver 850ish CFM
So that is 200 CFM the LSJ wastes. Which is basicly a 75% effeciency rating ONLY in regards to CFM. We can clean that up a bit in theory but we still have to take in to account opening up exhaust, colder/warmer air, AFR, spark, ...etc. Kinda hard to convert all of these little maths in to HP and ive got souvenier shopping to do today since im doing the good ol vacation deal.
All the stuff i typed could be off, go ahead and correct me if im wrong with the numbers since im doing this off memory guys, but it is basicly correct from an engineering standpoint.
Laminovas are one of the most effecient methods of cooling. Not flow, especially the design stated. Our IATs are already through the roof how they stand stock under WOT. Also the car wasnt intended for back to back runs for most of their customers. More like, spirited driving every now and then which it does quite nicely. Hence why it is aluminum and not copper. If the car's IATs were through the roof under a constant state of 150-170 then obviously copper would be solution. Highest conductor always wins vs the constant state of heat. But since our IATs fluctuate so much (stock) then the aluminum can dissipate the heat quicker than copper.
I think the best way your going to get around this is a larger aluminum core but to mesh it with something else that will do the cooling like the killer chiller perhaps. If your cool enough, you dont need that restriction. Many people with prior cooling mods can take this in to account.
Looking at it from a PSI side and calling it a bad design doesnt really tell us much since the engine's calculated CFM needed vs calculated CFM the blower delivers wasnt in to account. Now im only going off of memory here but when I did the calculations on a stock system....
The LSJ could take in to account 650ish CFM
The blower could deliver 850ish CFM
So that is 200 CFM the LSJ wastes. Which is basicly a 75% effeciency rating ONLY in regards to CFM. We can clean that up a bit in theory but we still have to take in to account opening up exhaust, colder/warmer air, AFR, spark, ...etc. Kinda hard to convert all of these little maths in to HP and ive got souvenier shopping to do today since im doing the good ol vacation deal.
All the stuff i typed could be off, go ahead and correct me if im wrong with the numbers since im doing this off memory guys, but it is basicly correct from an engineering standpoint.
Last edited by freakta; Jul 24, 2008 at 03:05 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
The pros and cons can be debated. By all means, remove your cores and run it and you will quickly see the cons. The happy-medium is hard to come by since everyone's setup is different.
One of the members here ran ONLY cooling mods and hit mid 13s. So you may think there is no benefit but cooling helps alot. GM was only doing the minimum to keep things from blowing up. While as restrictive as that may be.... it is somewhat effecient(ish) in terms of cooling vs flow. Now that is obviously an opinion of mine because im looking at the big picture of a FI engine that is not a turbo.
I think you should look in to the WHOLE port and polish SC argument and understand how much im against this intake mani. However, given the options, and to not target a select audience, it is a very niche market to get in to.
i agree with this post.... if we could see what is going on.
Last edited by rrutter81; Jul 24, 2008 at 04:19 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
nothing, ha ha.
no i was going to wait to see what happened with this to decide, been reading and keeping an eye on it. I just said **** it. It was getting too technical, too much science, I don't believe in science. I believe in shooting from the hip.
no i was going to wait to see what happened with this to decide, been reading and keeping an eye on it. I just said **** it. It was getting too technical, too much science, I don't believe in science. I believe in shooting from the hip.
seriously? are you really taking what I said that seriously. Get a life. And not that it is any of your business. I wanted to enlist right after 9/11 unfortunately they wouldn't take me, they don't like sprained acls in both knees that I had at the time and ligament damage in my ankle that has arthritis started in it.
Joined: 09-29-06
Posts: 20,663
Likes: 216
From: Land of Freedom
lol hes voting for obama that told me everything about anything that comes out of his mouth - listen to none of it lol.
on topic tho id put down 100 if i had it.....
on topic tho id put down 100 if i had it.....
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: 07-02-05
Posts: 8,725
Likes: 2
From: West Carrollton (Dayton), OH
Because I've been busy trying to figure out my idle surge/misfire/HORRIBLE mpg/powerloss issue the last 2 months. Kinda haven't been more worried about that than searching new posts. See link below
https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/lounge-42/dilema-sell-tvs-sportbike-123310/
https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/lounge-42/dilema-sell-tvs-sportbike-123310/
where do i send this 100 i have chillin in my paypal account. PM me back already rebel!!!
ahhaha we posted at the same time. i didnt have surgery. i had alot of Physical therapy though. i can still feel it if i bend my knee a certain way during practice
ahhaha we posted at the same time. i didnt have surgery. i had alot of Physical therapy though. i can still feel it if i bend my knee a certain way during practice
Last edited by ColeJJones; Jul 25, 2008 at 10:48 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost



