2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

question!?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 20, 2009 | 11:53 PM
  #1  
ajjaro's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-09-08
Posts: 1,654
Likes: 0
From: Florida
question!?

i had my vortex header, new downpipe, magnaflow high flow cat and exhaust installed today, and as i expected the car feels much more powerful, however:

1. i had a cracked cat on the stock system a few months ago, the new cat makes the same buzzing noise the cracked stock one made under any kind of acceleration.

2. on the highway my fuel economy has dropped by 5-6 mpg
on the service road it has increased by slightly???

isnt a full exhaust supposed to increase fuel economy?


opinions??

anyone?

Last edited by ajjaro; Feb 20, 2009 at 11:53 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 02:38 AM
  #2  
Redefined1's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 09-24-08
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
From: Springfield Missouri
im taking a wild shot at this but if you installed a 3 inch exhaust and dont have enough power to push it, that may be why you are losing gas milage. you have no back pressure for our superchargers which need it. i believe your losing torque which means you have to push the peddle a little further down in order to speed up causing you to lose mpg. just a shot in the dark as i dont know what size exhaust your running
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 02:40 AM
  #3  
OriGinaL Condo's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 03-27-08
Posts: 1,918
Likes: 0
From: Linden, New Jersey
Magnaflow isn't 3" so that wouldn't be the problem. Are you having more fun with the car? If you're taking advantage of that extra power it's going to burn more gas.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 02:41 AM
  #4  
ajjaro's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-09-08
Posts: 1,654
Likes: 0
From: Florida
to answer the first question its a 2.5 and i wasnt putting my foot down whatsoever, i was cruising at 65 mph, on cruise control, while i did that i reset my mpg meter, it read 23... under half throttle my mpg goes down to 5
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 09:58 AM
  #5  
Rippin07's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-22-07
Posts: 616
Likes: 1
From: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
see my post in JBP section.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 10:20 AM
  #6  
OriGinaL Condo's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 03-27-08
Posts: 1,918
Likes: 0
From: Linden, New Jersey
Originally Posted by ajjaro
to answer the first question its a 2.5 and i wasnt putting my foot down whatsoever, i was cruising at 65 mph, on cruise control, while i did that i reset my mpg meter, it read 23... under half throttle my mpg goes down to 5
Holy ****. Down to 5!?!?!? I hope you mean it went down BY 5. Cause if it went down to 5 while you're chilin in cruise control at 65mph you shouldn't be driving that **** around.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 12:56 PM
  #7  
ShortStack's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-16-08
Posts: 5,610
Likes: 0
From: Boynton Beach, Fl
Look at that header you have on.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 12:58 PM
  #8  
cakeeater's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-17-07
Posts: 9,378
Likes: 0
From: right behind you.
Originally Posted by Redefined1
im taking a wild shot at this but if you installed a 3 inch exhaust and dont have enough power to push it, that may be why you are losing gas milage. you have no back pressure for our superchargers which need it. i believe your losing torque which means you have to push the peddle a little further down in order to speed up causing you to lose mpg. just a shot in the dark as i dont know what size exhaust your running
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 01:02 PM
  #9  
ShortStack's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-16-08
Posts: 5,610
Likes: 0
From: Boynton Beach, Fl
OUR SUPERCHARGERS DO NOT WORK OFF OF BACKPRESSURE.

SEARCH FOR EXHAUST VELOCITY.

Rediefined...

and im sorry dude but that is the craziest thing i have ever heard. Even if he had a 3" exhaust, that would have NOTHING to do with it, because that scenario is just wild....

a 3" exhaust doesnt make you push the pedal down further... because of power loss... or for that matter in any way...
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 01:26 PM
  #10  
ajjaro's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-09-08
Posts: 1,654
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Originally Posted by OriGinaL Condo
Holy ****. Down to 5!?!?!? I hope you mean it went down BY 5. Cause if it went down to 5 while you're chilin in cruise control at 65mph you shouldn't be driving that **** around.
more like 3/4 throttle, i can floor it in the winter, no traction.... but i reset the mpg, give it a go and under 3/4 it says 5.x it stayes between that and 7 heavy acceleration... the shop has to do a check up next week, its standard for them to inspect after 500 kms. my engine check light also went on, but i assume thats bewcause the engine si breathing better
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 01:32 PM
  #11  
raptors_67's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-06-05
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
From: sk
Originally Posted by ajjaro
more like 3/4 throttle, i can floor it in the winter, no traction.... but i reset the mpg, give it a go and under 3/4 it says 5.x it stayes between that and 7 heavy acceleration... the shop has to do a check up next week, its standard for them to inspect after 500 kms. my engine check light also went on, but i assume thats bewcause the engine si breathing better
There are no DTC codes thrown when an engine "breathes" better. O2 sensors probably not installed correctly if at all.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 01:36 PM
  #12  
ajjaro's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-09-08
Posts: 1,654
Likes: 0
From: Florida
will that effect my gas economy also?
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 01:39 PM
  #13  
EXsoccer1921's Avatar
Senior Member
Platinum Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: 05-04-08
Posts: 36,934
Likes: 2
From: The 405
i'm gonna guess that youre just playin with the car more since you got it installed and thats whats eaating up gas. i was on the kansas turnpike last nighht about midnight-1am coming to topeka. and i was cruisin at 80 in 5th and every now and then stepped on it(in 5th) and got up past 100. i think i hit 110 atleast 5 times, and 120 once. and 100 countless times
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 01:41 PM
  #14  
ajjaro's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-09-08
Posts: 1,654
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Originally Posted by EXsoccer1921
i'm gonna guess that youre just playin with the car more since you got it installed and thats whats eaating up gas. i was on the kansas turnpike last nighht about midnight-1am coming to topeka. and i was cruisin at 80 in 5th and every now and then stepped on it(in 5th) and got up past 100. i think i hit 110 atleast 5 times, and 120 once. and 100 countless times
read the post at the top, i was putting my foot down on occasions, but, i put the car in a 65 cruise and reset the mpg meter, and it showed 23 over 10 miles, without me touching the accelerator once
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 02:12 PM
  #15  
ShortStack's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-16-08
Posts: 5,610
Likes: 0
From: Boynton Beach, Fl
Originally Posted by raptors_67
There are no DTC codes thrown when an engine "breathes" better. O2 sensors probably not installed correctly if at all.
Considering he replaced his downpipe, headers, and CAT... thers no doubt he has a check engine light...

You only need 1 o2 sensor installed, and thats the one on the front... the rear one doesnt need to be installed.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 02:47 PM
  #16  
Sharkey's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 10-27-07
Posts: 5,681
Likes: 266
From: Abbotsford BC
uh, unless you reflashed the pcm to get rid of the p0420, you need the second o2 sensor installed. previous owner got rid of the p0420 on my car, however when i built my exhaust and left the 2nd o2 sensor unhooked (even tried just hanging it outside the exhaust) it set heater circuit codes.

if you did all this with no tuning, id guess the code is p0420- low cat efficiency, because of the highflow cat. however get it looked at.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 03:17 PM
  #17  
ShortStack's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-16-08
Posts: 5,610
Likes: 0
From: Boynton Beach, Fl
Well.. thats true...

i didnt say you wouldnt get a code.. but... the car still runs.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 03:18 PM
  #18  
Redefined1's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 09-24-08
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
From: Springfield Missouri
Originally Posted by ShortStack
OUR SUPERCHARGERS DO NOT WORK OFF OF BACKPRESSURE.

SEARCH FOR EXHAUST VELOCITY.

Rediefined...

and im sorry dude but that is the craziest thing i have ever heard. Even if he had a 3" exhaust, that would have NOTHING to do with it, because that scenario is just wild....

a 3" exhaust doesnt make you push the pedal down further... because of power loss... or for that matter in any way...
so your seriously telling me that our roots type supercharger doesnt require some back pressure?
seems you dont know as much as you think you do. you lose power if you put on to big of an exhaust, if you dont think thats true i hope you go put a 4 inch exhaust on your car lmao
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 03:20 PM
  #19  
cakeeater's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-17-07
Posts: 9,378
Likes: 0
From: right behind you.
Originally Posted by Redefined1
so your seriously telling me that our roots type supercharger doesnt require some back pressure?
If he isn't, I am.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 03:23 PM
  #20  
scott allen's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-18-08
Posts: 2,495
Likes: 0
From: louisville k.y
could it be that since it is flowing a lot better the computer is giving it more fuel to make up for the extra air?
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 03:35 PM
  #21  
Redefined1's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 09-24-08
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
From: Springfield Missouri
Originally Posted by cakeeater
If he isn't, I am.
explain yourself please


if you dont have any back pressure there goes your low end torque.............
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 04:07 PM
  #22  
cakeeater's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-17-07
Posts: 9,378
Likes: 0
From: right behind you.
The only reason backpressure can cause changes in torque is because of the changes in A/F ratio CAUSED by backpressure. Less backpressure will equate to a leaner burn. When tuned for properly, less backpressure with equal EGV will always produce some gain whether it's noticeable or not. There is no physical advantage to having more backpressure ever unless your fuel/ignition system does not permit. I can explain it in far more detail if you'd like there is a lot of evidence of people losing tq due to huge decreases in backpressure, but it's not specifically because of that, but because of what that can cause. If your fuel system is adjusted accordingly, which it should unless you have a major change in back pressure, then it will be more efficient.

Unless he was running a catless setup or something, a loss in backpressure would likely not be the cause of his problems.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 04:25 PM
  #23  
Sharkey's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 10-27-07
Posts: 5,681
Likes: 266
From: Abbotsford BC
stop thinking backpressure, it doesnt make torque. scavaging makes torqe. look up what exhaust scavaning is, its the basis of why we put a header on a car. velocity is very important in scavaging. when you go to a large exhaust you lose velocity, and you end up with little scavaging. i could write pages on this stuff, but i wont cause only 1 or 2 people will understand it and its a waste of my time.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 04:44 PM
  #24  
cakeeater's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-17-07
Posts: 9,378
Likes: 0
From: right behind you.
Originally Posted by Sharkey
stop thinking backpressure, it doesnt make torque. scavaging makes torqe. look up what exhaust scavaning is, its the basis of why we put a header on a car. velocity is very important in scavaging. when you go to a large exhaust you lose velocity, and you end up with little scavaging. i could write pages on this stuff, but i wont cause only 1 or 2 people will understand it and its a waste of my time.
That's exactly what im saying. You can decrease back pressure without decreasing egv. better flow doesn't necessarily mean less low end torque. Especially when you have positive pressure on the intake side.

It depends on valvetrain components and others what kind of effect this will have because scavaging occurs during overlap mostly. At the same time, an n/a engine benefits much more from scavaging than a forced induction application. With the positive pressure on the intake side of things when under boost, there is no need for nor benefit to scavaging.

Last edited by cakeeater; Feb 21, 2009 at 05:05 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 05:30 PM
  #25  
scott allen's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-18-08
Posts: 2,495
Likes: 0
From: louisville k.y
Damn do you guys think i lost tq ? Here are my mods.

tvs supercharger
20 psi
cti header
cti 3 inch catless dp
cti 3 inch catback
79 lb injectors
cai
do you think the exhust is to much?
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:11 AM.