2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

Running the 2,6" Intense pulley @ 19,5 PSI ...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-28-2005, 03:44 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
retrop's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-26-05
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is very little to know about the GM until it actually comes out. The major weak link compared to the pioneers, like JMC and the group with the Intense kit, is the pully size. Most people with high power are about 0.3 inches or more smaller than the rumored GM pulley that will be in stage 2.

The GM tune may be more conservative than the methods others are using but this is the big question on the worth of getting the stage kits....
Old 12-28-2005, 05:18 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
Chevypowered's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-05-05
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 2,303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
JMC, you said the crank pulley was 6 or less in. Did you actually take the wheel off and the wheel well liner out and measure it or did you just try to do it from the top and get as close as possible? I might take the wheel and all the liners out on the pasanger side and get a accurate measurment.
Old 12-28-2005, 06:43 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
Badmunky's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-26-05
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,602
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why would you need to spin the motor to 8K? Its not a Honda. 6750 should be more then enuff. Mine hits the fuel cut at about 6400 on the tac.
Old 12-28-2005, 11:41 PM
  #29  
New Member
 
Drewfu$'s Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-20-05
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jmc007
For those who wants to know, I'm running up to 21,6 PSI of boost with the 2,6" pulley, logged with the Aeroforce Interceptor gauge.

BUT there is a GOOD amount of knock.

More to come soon, I would just say do not plan to go smaller than 2,8" for now.

)
Are you trying to blow that thing up? I thought the blower was more than maxed out at ~17psi? What are you trying to prove? I think you've got something up your sleeve....
Old 12-29-2005, 12:01 AM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
Tofu's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-11-05
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree w/ Jmc on the blowers "max" from Eaton being conservative. I spoke w/ Bob Stiegemeier on the phone a few months back in regards to porting the m62. He also said that in his experience with the m62 it can handle " 17,000 rpms without sacrificing internal integrity as long as the supercharger is not spinning at that speed consistantly on a daily basis." Now I'm not sure how far that goes in his own point of view, nor am I willing to find out lol.
Old 12-29-2005, 02:03 AM
  #31  
360 L337 User
 
R33P3R007's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-11-05
Location: Philadelphia, Pa
Posts: 7,454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bdwarr6
How do you figure, ive got more mods than rob and he put down 270?

i think he was talking about a 2.6 with stock everything else. not you and the stage 3 intense kit
Old 12-29-2005, 02:06 AM
  #32  
360 L337 User
 
R33P3R007's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-11-05
Location: Philadelphia, Pa
Posts: 7,454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
you guys are all crazy.. 8000 rpm redline, 20+ lbs of boost. I thought this thing was quick stock. 4cylinder and all. guess I was stupid. my bad.

Keep us posted and let us know what damage yall caue. so we can not.
Old 12-29-2005, 03:13 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Jmc007's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-22-05
Location: Quebec City, Quebec
Posts: 1,591
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Chevypowered
I was considering a 2.7" pulley if i feel the S/C isn't spinning too fast. I'm going to measure the crank pulley today and make my decision. I'll be soo close to the stock 12.5 PSI
At what altitude are you ? The barometric pressure (at sea level) is 14,7 PSI, but at 14 000 ft of altitude, it drops to 8,7. So that is a 6 PSI loss.

If you go to a 2,7" pulley instead of the stock 3,35" pulley, it will boost 6 PSI more over stock. If the total is still lower than 13 PSI, you shoud be able to run the stock injectors, until you run other mods. Still to be validated with a wideband meter for sure.
Old 12-29-2005, 03:15 PM
  #34  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Jmc007's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-22-05
Location: Quebec City, Quebec
Posts: 1,591
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BLKSS
Wow! Thats all I have to say. Almost 20lb of boost is crazy. Me and my friends are N/A freaks and im the only one with a SC. My plan was to stick with the GM kit coming out soon just because I dont want to be liable for the damage I can cause and I want to make sure the job is done right. Then again the gains that GM will have will not be close to you guys at all mainly because of pulley size. Is it still worth sticking to GM on this mod? Or should I go for more power and go with a diff kit? Is there something I should know about GM that I don't already know?
The main question is do you want to keep your OEM warranty !
Old 12-29-2005, 03:15 PM
  #35  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Jmc007's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-22-05
Location: Quebec City, Quebec
Posts: 1,591
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bdwarr6
How do you figure, ive got more mods than rob and he put down 270?
It was just an estimate, since your car is a 05. Keep us updated wity your dyno results !
Old 12-29-2005, 03:17 PM
  #36  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Jmc007's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-22-05
Location: Quebec City, Quebec
Posts: 1,591
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Chevypowered
JMC, you said the crank pulley was 6 or less in. Did you actually take the wheel off and the wheel well liner out and measure it or did you just try to do it from the top and get as close as possible? I might take the wheel and all the liners out on the pasanger side and get a accurate measurment.
I got the wheel off and the bottom of the wheel liner out. I measured it with an external outside diameter caliper. I measure it the most precise I could, but it's a kind of difficult place to measure.
Old 12-29-2005, 03:19 PM
  #37  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Jmc007's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-22-05
Location: Quebec City, Quebec
Posts: 1,591
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Drewfu$
Are you trying to blow that thing up? I thought the blower was more than maxed out at ~17psi? What are you trying to prove? I think you've got something up your sleeve....
No, no, no and what's the last phrase means ...

Just for your info, I saw the manifold boost pressure goes up just past 22 PSI last night. I know that is too much for now, that's why I run it with care.
Old 12-29-2005, 03:48 PM
  #38  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Jmc007's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-22-05
Location: Quebec City, Quebec
Posts: 1,591
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My thought is that we can benefit for the maximum possible TORQUE caused by the smallest possible pulley (probably the 2,6" pulley with a machined snout). Then, to lower the boost for the last RPM's, we could use a kind of wastegate or manual boost controller (set to 18 PSI as a pure example). We could plug it on the intake manifold hose ...

So the boost will goes up to roughly 21 PSI for the midrange, then lowers to 17 or 18 PSI for the last RPM's. Like the SRT-4 guys do (I think).

I found also that a MAP clamp will probably be useful too, helping us to tune the air fuel ratio in a better way. That's what I will try soon.

I also noticed that my Injector Pulse width is about 21,5 Ms at roughly 6 000 RPM's. Because the Max Boost is more than 20 PSI, the differential fuel pressure through the injectors is 60 PSI (fuel rail pressure) minus 20 PSI giving only 40 PSI.
Old 12-29-2005, 06:34 PM
  #39  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Jmc007's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-22-05
Location: Quebec City, Quebec
Posts: 1,591
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just bought this tonight ...

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Voodo...25082968QQrdZ1
Old 12-29-2005, 07:11 PM
  #40  
Senior Member
 
AlphaJaguar5's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-27-05
Location: Weston, FL
Posts: 1,780
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why...Would...You...Need...That
Old 12-29-2005, 07:14 PM
  #41  
Senior Member
 
Shermen's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-22-05
Location: Michigan, Clinton Twp
Posts: 787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
mabey he plans on getting the twincharger kit. but thats a prity shitty boost controller if you ask me.
Old 12-29-2005, 07:29 PM
  #42  
Senior Member
 
Chevypowered's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-05-05
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 2,303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jmc007
At what altitude are you ? The barometric pressure (at sea level) is 14,7 PSI, but at 14 000 ft of altitude, it drops to 8,7. So that is a 6 PSI loss.

If you go to a 2,7" pulley instead of the stock 3,35" pulley, it will boost 6 PSI more over stock. If the total is still lower than 13 PSI, you shoud be able to run the stock injectors, until you run other mods. Still to be validated with a wideband meter for sure.


I'm at 7,000 Ft. The pressure is roughly 3 PSI lower than sea level but with the air being less dense I don't think it can compress it as well and adding that onto the already 3 PSI lower makes it a 6 PSI loss. 6.5 PSI is what the interceptor gauge used to read when my car was stock, now I get 11.5 PSI here and 12.6 PSI at 5,000 Ft.
Old 12-29-2005, 10:12 PM
  #43  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Jmc007's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-22-05
Location: Quebec City, Quebec
Posts: 1,591
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Shermen
mabey he plans on getting the twincharger kit. but thats a prity shitty boost controller if you ask me.
Will try to put this in line between the manifold hose and the by-pass valve selenoid, that's pretty cheap to do some tests.
Old 01-03-2006, 10:05 PM
  #44  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Jmc007's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-22-05
Location: Quebec City, Quebec
Posts: 1,591
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I notice (experimented) that the Denso Iridium plugs helps a lot to eliminate the "bog" at low RPM's, since they need less energy to spark. For sure the better is to get some step colder plugs when changing the blower pulley size. First I ran the Denso Iridium #IK20 (same heat range than stock NGK) with a lot of detonation (knock) with the 2,6 pulley. Now I ran the NGK BKR7E (one range colder, V-Power Copper) with some less knock. I will try soon some Denso Iridium #IK27 (merely three range colder than stock, just like the NGK BKR9EIX plugs). Rob any knock with the 2,8" pulley ?
Old 01-03-2006, 10:13 PM
  #45  
Senior Member
 
Leafy's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-25-05
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 1,149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice Jean Marc, can't wait to see more results.
Old 01-03-2006, 10:20 PM
  #46  
Senior Member
 
06black's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-13-05
Location: the glove
Posts: 5,733
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Chevypowered
Nice to here the crank is smaller, now i can think a bout a 2.7" pulley!! i think those can fit over the stock snout, just need to find someone who makes it. Thanks for the update!!

billetflow makes a 2.7in pully....just a lil fyi
Old 01-22-2006, 12:38 PM
  #47  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Jmc007's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-22-05
Location: Quebec City, Quebec
Posts: 1,591
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jmc007
I notice (experimented) that the Denso Iridium plugs helps a lot to eliminate the "bog" at low RPM's, since they need less energy to spark. For sure the better is to get some step colder plugs when changing the blower pulley size. First I ran the Denso Iridium #IK20 (same heat range than stock NGK) with a lot of detonation (knock) with the 2,6 pulley. Now I ran the NGK BKR7E (one range colder, V-Power Copper) with some less knock. I will try soon some Denso Iridium #IK27 (merely three range colder than stock, just like the NGK BKR9EIX plugs). Rob any knock with the 2,8" pulley ?
I installed the Denso Iridium IK27 (three range colder than stock), but there was a LOT of knock with them. As expected earlier, since the electrode is so small and take less voltage to spark, they seem to spark either stronger or sooner, giving some knock (the timing being not optimised). I went back to NGK V-Power BKR7E.
Old 01-23-2006, 06:28 PM
  #48  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Jmc007's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-22-05
Location: Quebec City, Quebec
Posts: 1,591
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just receive my manual boost controller ...

Originally Posted by Jmc007
Hey it's kinda cheap, very simple to install, and works VERY well ! I installed it between the by-pass valve selenoid and the by-pass valve actuator lower nipple.

As an example, I set it manually, and today my boost goes very quickly up to 16.7 PSI, and stay there until redline.

So with this device, you have the possibility to tune your maximum boost anywhere between 12 PSI (the stock maximum boost or the boost where the stock selenoid bleed the extra boost) and the maximum boost your aftermarket pulley can achieve.

For my example, I can tune the boost anywhere between 12 and 22 PSI with the 2.6" pulley !

It could be nice for those who want to run a small pulley (2.9" or less) and don't want to swap the injectors.
Old 01-23-2006, 06:35 PM
  #49  
Senior Member
 
pclear9061's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-06-05
Location: California
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
you havent blown your s/c yet?????? your god damn lucky
Old 01-23-2006, 07:28 PM
  #50  
Senior Member
 
Leafy's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-25-05
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 1,149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jmc007
Hey it's kinda cheap, very simple to install, and works VERY well ! I installed it between the by-pass valve selenoid and the by-pass valve actuator lower nipple.

As an example, I set it manually, and today my boost goes very quickly up to 16.7 PSI, and stay there until redline.

So with this device, you have the possibility to tune your maximum boost anywhere between 12 PSI (the stock maximum boost or the boost where the stock selenoid bleed the extra boost) and the maximum boost your aftermarket pulley can achieve.

For my example, I can tune the boost anywhere between 12 and 22 PSI with the 2.6" pulley !

It could be nice for those who want to run a small pulley (2.9" or less) and don't want to swap the injectors.
Essentially, the supercharger is still producing maximum boost, but the bypass valve (with the controller) acts as a wastegate to allow only some of the boost to get to the engine... smart!


Quick Reply: Running the 2,6" Intense pulley @ 19,5 PSI ...



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:03 PM.