L61 Vs LAP
 

I've been wondering about this, stock for stock or modded equally the same which is quicker?

Is the only difference the 2.4 manifold on the LAP?

L61 is...i drove a lap and it is dog shit

L61 is...i drove a lap and it is dog shit yes it was an auto but i was very dissapointed considering the higher horsepower rating

LAP also has VVT

lap has the newer crappier 2.4 manifold, not the older good one...its a drivers race

VVT..

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

L61 > LAP. I also drove a 5-speed LAP, exact same options as when my L61 was stock, and, let me tell you, LAP = turd.

and to think, the cruze will be an ultra turd. the top model, a damn diesel, gets 150hp. the models under that are a joke, unless they plan on selling em 10g's a piece, they won't get any real sales off em.

I haven't driven an LAP, but I would rather have my L61 over it. The LAP gets it's max torque and HP at a higher RPM than the L61 plus it loses a bit on the low end cause of that.

My LAP was like a dog. I haven't driven an L61 so I can't make a comparison, but it was enough for me to add a SC at 4500 miles!

drove it again just to see if i was crazy and yep absolute dog shit

over the months i wonder if this has changed?! ...

old thread revival :) go!

L61 = win

They're both dogs stock, so it is like which one is worse, really.

I have an l61 and my mom has a lap. I have a 2.4 mani,injen intake and a catback but no tune, so I'm basically stock speed/power. Both are autos, I notice a difference in the power band but neither one really amde me say, wow, faster :)