well after all of my new parts were installed I finally got on the dyno today. Ran 300 horsepower and 305 torque. but I am maxed out my turbo

 

The torque seems a little low.

 

agreed I hit that TQ on Raven's Mustang dyno. i would have suspected 350+ TQ.

 

The horse power looks about right. But I would have thought the torque would have been up around the 340+ range. Who tuned the car fro you ?

 

jd racing we could have gotten more but started to get knock so we detuned it. im going to build the motor and get a bigger turbo. than do it again lol

 

Well I know for a fact that jd nows his stuff. So if he said to stop there. Then I would trust him on that. But like I said I have seen every other tuned cobalt around 340+ trq and the same hp as yours. I bet the car still works really well. From your numbers you are about +25 ish whp and +10 ish wtrq over a gms1 car. Did you have gms1 before ? Or just tuned it from the stock tune with the parts ?

 

Tuned from stock

 

What were your stick numbers ? I'm curious as to how much HP and trq you did gain ? Also, I was thinking. If Danny uses a mustang dyno. That would account for some of the low tea.

 

would make a lot more sense for these to be mustang dyno numbers. they'd be damn good mustang numbers if that were the case!

 

Dynojet

 

It has more in it than that. Maxed out on 91 octane I have tuned stock K04s to 415 wrtq and 325 whp on high boost (26-27 psi) on a dynojet.

 

qft you have my car running better numbers (torque wise on stock turbo)

 

Yes if you took yours to the same dyno as you did your GMS1 run I would expect 315-320 whp and 370-380 wtrq out of your car with the tune in it. That mustang dyno you used is a real heart breaker LOL.

 

I would if i could haha the guy get rid of that dynojet for the mustang he has now. Heart is no where near broken, they are just numbers car hauls total ass and makes me grin ear to ear that's what counts haha

 

Yes. Next time you are there you should pop it on with the GMS1 tune just to see what it makes on that dyno. I am curious never seen anyone with GMS1 dyno on a mustang dyno (not including zzps high reading dyno) before.

 

certainly will do

 

I can't wait untill I get you two to help me tune my car ! It's killing me. The GMS1 just isn't cutting it any more !

 

anytime now... I'm broke! /threadjack

 

could have been shitty gas too that i had. It was in the car for a couple of weeks and i think i filled up at irving

 

So im replacing the clutch cause we had too much torque for the stock one then going back to the dyno. And some propergas lol. Looking foward to see what he really did for power lo l

 

Dyno numbers are a hilarious spectrum. Account for 10-15% more on dyno jet, than another 10-15% for crank. There there is bhp, American HP, Australian KW etc. it's all about having the biggest car *****!!!

I normally run my 286 WHP (mustang) tune daily, but on dynojet numbers that's 330 WHP. Or 380 crank. My 346 WHP (mustang) tune would be 400 dynojet WHP, or 460 crank hp.

I could use my inflated car ***** 460 HP number, or if I converted my low power 234 WHP tune to KW, it would be 171 Kw....

Even without changing anything, my car will have typically a 2-5WHP variance between runs on the dyno....

Everyone allways overstates their power to make their car ***** seem bigger than the next guys. If the car throws you back in your seat, and puts a smile on your face, who cares?

You gave me an idea for a cool forum signature though! Gonna make a image in photoshop of my car all flashy and ****, and be like "Cobalt SS 2.4 turbo .2 MegaWatt / 300 Million calories/hour"