Drag Racing Kindle Racing and Dalcorp Racing

Last night at the Track

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 14, 2009 | 08:26 AM
  #1  
Parsons09's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 09-20-07
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
From: Dayton
Last night at the Track

So last night I took my '06 Cobalt SS n/a to the track for the first time. I wasnt expecting much from it is bone stock and an auto. I ran 3 times, I would have the slips but I am currently at work and cannot use the scanner.

From memory:

1st Run

1.406 Reaction
16.899 1/4
75.42 MPH

2nd Run

.747 Reaction
16.702 1/4
83.47 MPH

3rd Run

1.046 Reaction
16.689 1/4
84.72 MPH

Before I ran, my friend asked me what I thought I would run. I said i would be real happy with a 16.5 1/4 @ 85MPH.... I guess I wasn't too far off.

I guess I'm just looking for some comments on this. Yes I know my car sucks because its N/A and an auto....
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2009 | 08:29 AM
  #2  
papasmurf's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 02-11-08
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
From: nc
be happy with what ya got bud. make do with it, until you can do better. keep working at it though.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2009 | 08:39 AM
  #3  
Alexander.w's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 04-06-09
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
From: Philadelphia
damn... i thought the 2.4 would do a little better then that... ugh! im afriad to take the 2.2 to the track now. ha
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2009 | 08:47 AM
  #4  
Parsons09's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 09-20-07
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
From: Dayton
Originally Posted by Alexander.w
damn... i thought the 2.4 would do a little better then that... ugh! im afriad to take the 2.2 to the track now. ha
Haha me too, But i was being realistic when i guessed 16.5. My friend has a 2.2l manual and he pussed out and didnt go. I wanted to see him run too, because there really isnt much difference between the 2.2 and 2.4L's.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2009 | 10:09 PM
  #5  
FutureEcotecOwner's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-28-08
Posts: 2,585
Likes: 0
From: Clarksville
Originally Posted by Parsons09
Haha me too, But i was being realistic when i guessed 16.5. My friend has a 2.2l manual and he pussed out and didnt go. I wanted to see him run too, because there really isnt much difference between the 2.2 and 2.4L's.
I'm gonna have to disagree with you on that. I believe a well driven 5spd 2.4 can run 15.1-15.3, and that is with a good driver. I think the best a 5spd 2.2 could muster would be 15.5-15.6 stock, so realistically they're about a 1/2 second apart. Not that there is anything wrong with an auto, but you should have gotten a 5spd in the 2.4 and went with a N/A build. Or start building the motor now and then build the auto. Happy modding!!
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2009 | 10:19 PM
  #6  
sean_halla's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-08-08
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
From: Jville,NC/D.C.,VA
Originally Posted by FutureEcotecOwner
I'm gonna have to disagree with you on that. I believe a well driven 5spd 2.4 can run 15.1-15.3, and that is with a good driver. I think the best a 5spd 2.2 could muster would be 15.5-15.6 stock, so realistically they're about a 1/2 second apart. Not that there is anything wrong with an auto, but you should have gotten a 5spd in the 2.4 and went with a N/A build. Or start building the motor now and then build the auto. Happy modding!!
I ran a 15.1 in my stock 2.4 5spd. Never hooked up in first.
Dont have the slip anymore to post a pic either.

Ive heard of people hitting 14.9 in stock 2.4's.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2009 | 11:14 PM
  #7  
reaper89's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 11-22-07
Posts: 2,009
Likes: 1
From: Salem, WI
I ran 16.3 all day long with my 2.2 auto when I had just a cai
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2009 | 11:43 PM
  #8  
FutureEcotecOwner's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-28-08
Posts: 2,585
Likes: 0
From: Clarksville
Originally Posted by sean_halla
I ran a 15.1 in my stock 2.4 5spd. Never hooked up in first.
Dont have the slip anymore to post a pic either.

Ive heard of people hitting 14.9 in stock 2.4's.
That is what I'm saying. In this situation, with this car, an auto and 5spd are in a different league. Granted if were talking about other cars such as Mustangs, Camaros, etc., there isnt much of a difference in auto and 5spd, but when the cars arent all that quick to begin with, the auto and 5spd are way different. And as we see here, it's about a 1 1/2 second difference between the 2.
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2009 | 12:18 AM
  #9  
jeremie1's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 04-08-09
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
From: kansas city
Originally Posted by FutureEcotecOwner
That is what I'm saying. In this situation, with this car, an auto and 5spd are in a different league. Granted if were talking about other cars such as Mustangs, Camaros, etc., there isnt much of a difference in auto and 5spd, but when the cars arent all that quick to begin with, the auto and 5spd are way different. And as we see here, it's about a 1 1/2 second difference between the 2.
........is every post you make full of retarded jibberish?
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2009 | 12:22 AM
  #10  
sport08's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-04-08
Posts: 3,279
Likes: 0
From: pennsylvania
i always told the diff. between the 5 speed and auto in the 2.4 was .2-.3 seconds
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2009 | 07:30 AM
  #11  
FutureEcotecOwner's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-28-08
Posts: 2,585
Likes: 0
From: Clarksville
Originally Posted by sport08
i always told the diff. between the 5 speed and auto in the 2.4 was .2-.3 seconds
Not gonna say that the OP is running normal auto 2.4 times, but you cant say that an auto will ever do better than a mid to high 15?

Originally Posted by jeremie1
........is every post you make full of retarded jibberish?
Looks like it doesnt it!!

Last edited by FutureEcotecOwner; Aug 15, 2009 at 07:30 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2009 | 08:17 AM
  #12  
freakta's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 04-22-07
Posts: 5,575
Likes: 0
From: milton ma
what was your short time in those runs?
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2009 | 04:31 PM
  #13  
Parsons09's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 09-20-07
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
From: Dayton
Originally Posted by FutureEcotecOwner
I'm gonna have to disagree with you on that. I believe a well driven 5spd 2.4 can run 15.1-15.3, and that is with a good driver. I think the best a 5spd 2.2 could muster would be 15.5-15.6 stock, so realistically they're about a 1/2 second apart. Not that there is anything wrong with an auto, but you should have gotten a 5spd in the 2.4 and went with a N/A build. Or start building the motor now and then build the auto. Happy modding!!
I should have made clearer. I think my 2.4 auto and my friends 2.2 5 speed would be close.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2009 | 03:45 PM
  #14  
ralliartist's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-06-05
Posts: 10,944
Likes: 2
From: Seneca, South Carolina
2 different cars running 15.1-15.3 and 15.5-15.56 isn't a big difference at all. That's so close it's actually arguable which car is actually faster.
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2009 | 09:50 AM
  #15  
Parsons09's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 09-20-07
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
From: Dayton
Oh well i think im just gonna buy some NOS and see what happens.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sl0wbaltSS
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
18
Nov 21, 2018 11:11 PM
n20saturn
Drag Racing
19
Oct 6, 2015 12:38 PM
InfraRedline
Drag Racing
35
Sep 29, 2015 02:09 PM
Extremespeed
South Pacific
0
Sep 29, 2015 04:34 AM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:39 AM.