jzehren11

iTrader: (6)

A Day late, surprised no one posted it yet!

http://www.flickr.com/photos/78379868@N05/11703944796/

trying out a new watermark for the year... idk if I like it or not, I need a professional logo made up.

ForsakenOutlaw57

Your watermark should look like this:



Seriously that would be funny.

I do love Fig Newtons though.

DSmastery

iTrader: (5)

im in

BPacak

in

Tsbbzm

iTrader: (1)

In with no pictures yet..

armcclure

iTrader: (2)

In

dandaman15

Subd

MitchSS

o hai

jonathan923

iTrader: (2)

Subd

bmartz1991

iTrader: (35)

Here

Gelladuga69

iTrader: (4)

In. Pics s00n.

ForsakenOutlaw57

Okay I'll picspam - all film photos.

















They're really 2013 but what the hell.

ForsakenOutlaw57

Now for color:

DSmastery

iTrader: (5)

even tho they were from 2013 they feel like some 70-80s era

i like the doggy ones

BlueBalt1113

iTrader: (2)

in

keiserX13

iTrader: (3)

in for pics

Boostin15

iTrader: (2)

in

sergiochaotik

yay first page post. sub'd for life.

..well for the year

http://www.flickr.com/photos/98697476@N04/11738731955/

DSmastery

iTrader: (5)

the cc's have some sick headlights

sergiochaotik

taillights? the headlights are from an MkV

Sh3itskees

In!

DSmastery

iTrader: (5)

not in the picture, i was just making a comment about the car

ForsakenOutlaw57

Thanks, the black and white photos were shot on Kodak Tri-X ISO-400 film on a Yashica TL Electro-X that is literally from the early 70s (or late 60s). The color photos were shot on Kodak Portra ISO-400 film on a late-80s (maybe?) Nikon FM2n.

The B&W made me happy because I have this thing about grain. In digital, I despise it 100%. I want no grain whatsoever unless I intend for it, I hate it so much. In film, I don't mind it but I don't want a lot of it. The first roll of B&W I shot was Fuji Neopan ISO-400 and it had tremendous grain, too much for my taste.

This image here is with the Fuji Neopan on the Yashica camera with a 50mm lens. You can see how grainy it is.



Compare now to this one with the Kodak Tri-X on the same camera with the same lens:



It's like night & day difference. I'll use the Tri-X again but for my next roll of B&W I'm going to use Ilford Delta ISO-400. It's supposed to be fine grain and I'm going to run it through my Nikon FM2n.

Sad part of all of this, my first 6 photographs on the Tri-X did not develop - probably because I loaded the film wrong into the camera. Tragic indeed! I'm hoping not to repeat that mistake.

DSmastery

iTrader: (5)

loading film sounds funny u dinosaur haha

that is seriously night and day difference. and grain has its place at times, it does suck on digital

ForsakenOutlaw57

Yeah well - a guy I work with develops it himself but also bought film in bulk so he can load is own rolls! Me, no thanks, I'll pay $4 - $8 for the roll and $17.50 (I know right?) to develop it and not screw up royally.