Cobalt SS Network

Cobalt SS Network (https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/)
-   Suspension (https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/suspension-67/)
-   -   Softer front springs for better launch? (https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/suspension-67/softer-front-springs-better-launch-316000/)

Ronn2005 02-26-2015 09:56 AM

Softer front springs for better launch?
 
Just thinking out loud. Here is my thinking.

I have v1 powell springs, koni shocks, and air bags in the rear. I was wondering if I put my stock springs ( or even softer springs ) in the front would that help with launch? My reasoning is that the softer front springs would throw less weight to the rear during launch?

What do you guys thing?

blueLNFftw 02-26-2015 10:17 AM

It will wheel hop more.

Ronn2005 02-26-2015 12:23 PM


Originally Posted by blueLNFftw (Post 7499886)
It will wheel hop more.

I am trying to understand the physics of the softer spring causing wheel hop.

So, a softer front spring will " hop / jump / bounce " up in the wheel well during launch because it will compress more?

And a stiffer front spring will not " hop / jump / bounce " up in the wheel well during launch because it wont compress as much?

Staged07SS 02-26-2015 12:30 PM


Originally Posted by Ronn2005 (Post 7499983)
I am trying to understand the physics of the softer spring causing wheel hop.

So, because the front spring is softer it will compress and " bounce / jump " up in the wheel well more during launch?

And a stiff front spring will not compress " bounce / jump " up in the wheel well because it wont compress as much?

You would want a stiffer setup out back to help with weight transfer... leave the fronts alone.

That's why peeps tend to insert pee wee footballs in the rear coils to act as cheap drag bags.

wayfarer 02-26-2015 12:32 PM

straps / cables / chains in the front.

LTBALTBMX 02-26-2015 12:37 PM

Your axel has a tendency to compress the spring up until the point where the tire breaks grip. At this point, the spring rebounds, releasing the potential energy until your tire catches grip again. The whole thing repeats and you get a forced vibration aka wheel hop.

Stiffer springs will reduce the amount of stored energy and instead your tires will break grip before your spring compresses an appreciable amount.

The potential energy is 0.5*(spring rate)*(spring compression)*(spring compression). Notice that while the spring rate goes down, your spring compression will go up but since its multiplied twice then the energy build up from the softer springs will actually increase.

Lets say you go with springs that are a quarter as stiff. Then your spring will compress 4x as much (idealized). So, the extra energy build up is actually proportional to (1/4*4*4) the inverse of the factor of decrease in your spring rate. Of course, I am assuming the amount of force feeding into the spring from the axel remains equal in both scenarios (it isn't, the geometry changes as the spring compresses but the amount of change is small enough for this assumption to be valid).

I believe the idea of the rotated mounts is to align the driveline geometry to minimize the amount of force going into the springs, thereby reducing the build up of potential energy

Ronn2005 02-26-2015 12:41 PM


Originally Posted by LTBALTBMX (Post 7499991)
Your axel has a tendency to compress the spring up until the point where the tire breaks grip. At this point, the spring rebounds, releasing the potential energy until your tire catches grip again. The whole thing repeats and you get a forced vibration aka wheel hop.

Stiffer springs will reduce the amount of stored energy and instead your tires will break grip before your spring compresses an appreciable amount.

The potential energy is 0.5*(spring rate)*(spring compression)*(spring compression). Notice that while the spring rate goes down, your spring compression will go up but since its multiplied twice then the energy build up from the softer springs will actually increase.

Lets say you go with springs that are a quarter as stiff. Then your spring will compress 4x as much (idealized). So, the extra energy build up is actually proportional to (1/4*4*4) the factor of decrease in your spring rate. Of course, I am assuming the amount of force feeding into the spring from the axel remains equal in both scenarios.

Interesting. Thankyou for the quick lesson. Yeah I guess I will leave my set up alone then. :)

LNFTX 02-26-2015 02:37 PM

As stated above strap the front and do a stiffer setup in the rear, but remember your not gonna see much gain here. If you already have good tires and are looking to get a little more out of your 60 ft have a th it but ride quality will suffer

Ronn2005 02-26-2015 03:44 PM

Roger that thank you. I don't think I can go too much stiffer with out sacrificing my ride quality. I already have powell springs, koni shocks, and an airlift 1000 bag in the rear.

Staged07SS 02-27-2015 07:23 AM


Originally Posted by Ronn2005 (Post 7500086)
Roger that thank you. I don't think I can go too much stiffer with out sacrificing my ride quality. I already have powell springs, koni shocks, and an airlift 1000 bag in the rear.

Thats more than enough...

Focus on some good tires and you will be set.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:48 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands