I think throught this topic it has allready been said that a LT1 is a even match up for a SS/SC and it is.

And LT1's are not 100mph plus 1/4 mile monsters either.

 

lol.. you people are funny.. LT1's are not an even match.. it's a driver's race between an LT1 from 93-96 (97's had more power) and a 99-04 mustang gt.. and you SS's arent up with us V8's, even with your forced induction

 

I think I'm going to order the psi kit tomorrow from revit up motor sports. I'm going to suprise my friend the next time we go out and battle.
Joe

 

Give it up Jasonh_86 you don't know jack ****.

A) LT1's moved up to 285HP in 1996 unless it was a CA car then it was 1995.

B) How do LT1's eat 96-98 Cobras but are an even match for a 260HP 1999-2004 GT
when in other posts you say the 1996-1998 Cobra is faster than a GT?

C) Your GT doesn't run 13.5's

 

Why dont you give it up and get a real car?

A) LT1's moved up in '97

B)LT1's dont eat 96-98 Cobras by any means, and yes they are a driver's race for 99-04 GT's.. 96-98 Cobra is faster than 99-04 GT stock for stock

C) My GT does run 13.5's.. ask hatrickstu, he knows this too, he's not a ricer pos like you guys.. bone stock GT's can run mid-low 13's with the right driver..

go do your research or stfu and mind your own business.. you're just mad because your 4cyl can only get 205hp from the factory with a blower

If i didnt know jack ****, i would've bought a Cobalt SS/SC.. not an American V8

 

That must make me a genius I own both.

 

Alright guys stop hating on my Homeboy Coddy.!

 

just let jason 86 think he knows what hes talking about and end it.... most v8 owners are like him until you pull on them ....

 

That's a crock of ****!1 I've been to thr tarck many times, and in many states (Wa, Nv, Az, Ca, NC), and HAVE NEVER seen a stock '99'-'04 GT run a low-mid 13....EVER!!!! The average I've witnessed is low-mid 14's, with the occasional high 13. Dude, face it..your car is basically a 350z

 

This is my other car jack ass. Would you like an appointment to have your ass handed to you?




And yes LT1's were 285HP in 1996 due to the new dual cat y-pipe unless it was a CALI. car then they were 285HP in 1995.

You are quite possible the dumbest Mustang driver I have ever met. I bought a new GT in 2003 and was and still am on Stangnet. If you are running mid/low 13's in your stock GT you better tell them about it.

Even though they all drive Mustangs they still need a good laugh just like we do

 

4.6 GT's run mid-low 13's with the right driver?? HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!
I know someone that had a 2000 GT with intake, exhaust, and 4.10's, and I think a few other typical small mustang mods, and he ran a BEST of 13.7@100 with Nitto DR's cutting 1.7 60's, and this kid drove the hell out of the car trust me. GT's do not come anywhere close to mid 13's stock and have trouble getting high 13's if at all. LS1's get mid to low 13's and they have quite a bit more power than a 4.6 GT. Seriously dude, you really have no idea what youre talking about, and Im gonna have to call BS on your times, even if you do provide someone elses timeslip that shows the times youre claiming

Cody, dont even bother with this kid anymore. Hes just another mustang dreamer wishing he had half the potential of an LS1

 

LS1 cars are nice, I almost got one myself.. but I'm not scared of them. I've taken a few LS1's in my day, yes they were LS1's and i'm not bs'ing.. i've also been stomped by many LS1's.. they're the best motor Chevy has ever put out, imo..

I will provide you people with MY timeslip.. You really need to stop doubting about this **** just because of what "you see at the track". Most people who own cars can't drive worth a crap. Stock GT's can run mid-to-low 13's with the right track prep, launch and driver. It's all in the driver, track prep, altitude and temperature/humidity.

You can bring your LS1 out, i'm not scared.. The best one of those has ran at the track down here was 10.96.. I'm never scared to race anyone, even if i'm gonna lose..

And as for saying my car is basically a 350Z is total crap. I've raped many of those cars, mainly because people can't drive and because they're slower than me. Displacement and torque talks

Maybe I am wrong about the camaros, I could care less. I hate camaros and have no interest in them, so what do i care?? There's only a few Camaros that I do like and it's only because the owner's are cool. The new ones looked like catfish anyways, ugly damn things

And as for "getting beat by LT1's" you are wrong. I raced my ex-gf MMMAAANNNYYY times in her '97 Z28 (30th anniversary edition, white w/orange stripes) and she got me HARD off the line nearly everytime.. but I did slowly catch up and creep past her, but if I got her off the line it stayed like that.. she wanted to race from a roll, so i let her nail it b4 i downshifted and I still passed the car.. it had some mods done to it, so you can't say it was bone stock.

Now stop all the "BS" calling because you people can't prove anything. I have my timeslips, I have people who have rode with me when I beat LS1's.

Oh yah, CoddySS if you want proof I beat an LS1 6-spd then go to Stangnet.com and pm GT 5spd. He was in the car with me all 3 times. He was also at the track when I made that pass.

I have told people on stangnet and they believe me, it's nothing to call bs about. It happens every weekend at the track for people on there. You just have to be a fairly decent driver, that's all.. so what if the 4.6L's dont take mods too well

 

cody he does run 13.5 man on the g-tech. lol

n e ways seriously. jasonh_86, your a child. stop trolling saying that your mustang is the best thang since sliced bread. if the mustang was all that bad. then ford wouldnt ahve needed to put an s/c on the cobra to beable to finally beat an ls1. seriously.

 

99-04 GT's DO NOT RUN LOW-MID 13's STOCK. Period. *


Unless you're Evan Smith driving an '01 Bullitt GT in excellent conditions. In that case, you could go 13.5

 

'01 bullitt only has 10 more hp at the crank.. so you just proved my point!

 

They came out with the Mach 1 and '01 Cobra didnt they??.. what about the '00 Cobra R????

They didn't need a blower to beat an LS1, mustangs were selling like mad compared to camaros so why bother with more power when it's already popular?

SVT decided to just step it up a notch to see wtf it'd do basically.. nothing to do with LS1's..Camaros and Trans Ams were dead in '03 anyways..

 

if you're gonna say that, then I guess GM had to add a blower to the cobalt so it could beat Honda Civics and V6 Mustangs... how's that feel?

 

I know this guy's a huge troll and rather unintelligent, but come on, Eddie, I know you're better than that pathetic argument.

Not only is it the same argument that every N/A import uses on the SS/SC and SRT-4, but also, while the LS1 is slightly faster, the Mach 1 is a driver's race with the LS1 and obviously its N/A.

Anyway, back to arguing with the other guy...

 

Please, if you're going to just go by the official crank numbers as the difference between a GT and a Bullitt, then you aren't worth talking to, and you don't know JACK about Mustangs.

 

powerwise jackass.. i know the differences in the cars.. i know more than you ******* ******** think.. how do u know that much if ur on a damn cobalt site??????

 

Please provide proof of dead ass factory stock GT's running mid to low 13's, because I for one would LOVE to see proof of it. I already know 100% that its impossible for a car that weighs more than 3300 pounds to produce a 13.5 timeslip with a measly 260hp and barely 300lb/ft, but I just want you to attempt to prove us wrong.
Tell me this. How can a car with roughly 50 less hp and 40lb/ft less torque as an LS1 run the same times as you say they can? And hell, youre saying that your modded GT is running 13.5's (which I am also kinda doubting with your mods), yet a stock GT can run the same times? You are totally contradicting yourself with that one buddy. Please move on

 

I cant get traction and I suck at driving.. there are some awesome drivers out there who have done it. I've seen many videos of it and i'm currently trying to locate one of them, since i didnt save it on the computer. LS1's are capable of 12's very lightly modded (some even bone stock with the right driver).. but LS1 drivers around here suck.. I will post a video of my pass if I can ever get the guy to burn it onto a dvd so i can put it on my computer.. i'll post my time slip also.. i'm not trying to argue right now, i'm just saying that i know your'e calling bs (which i may call bs if i didnt know about mustangs) so i'm just trying to show you it's possible..

 

Yeah, way to prove my point.... if you think that the difference between a GT and a Bullitt is as simple as the Ford-claimed 5 peak crank hp gain, then you don't know JACK.

BTW, I DARE you to find any stock 99-04 GT's running low-mid 13's stock. Let me give you a little tip... you won't find any. The only legitimate mid-13 second run with a STOCK 99-04 GT was Evan Smith in Muscle Mustangs and Fast Fords running a 13.5@103 in a bone stock '01 BULLITT, which is a tenth or 2 faster than a regular GT all else being equal.



Oh, I guess you're right. I mean, I can only be on one forum, right? Please, my farts know more about Mustangs than you do. Get a clue and stop making the rest of the Mustang owners look bad.

BTW, I'm on this Cobalt site and many other forums in addition to numerous Mustang forums because I'm a car enthusiast and I'm interested in virtually all cars, not just a Mustang fan-boy.

 

When it comes to Mach1 vs LS1 it's a little more than a drivers race but I have seen a Mach1 pull on a LS1 once or twice. But with equal drivers from a dig it will be close for a second or too but thats all then bye, bye Mach1. From a roll the Mach1 doesn't even stand a chance.

As for Bullitt GT's when compared to a 100% stock GT they are usually a tad faster. When my 2003 GT was only sporting a K&N I raced a 100% stock Bullitt and it was dead even all three times until we started running out 4th then he pulled on me by maybe a door.

 

your right i'm sorry. but can i say nother one that alot of true ricers use

"you have more displacement." "i'm only a 1.6 your a 2.xx" in fords case, "i'm only a 4.6, your a 5.7" lol sorry i had to , oooh ooh on more. "the mach1 has 2 cams, ls1's have 1 cam" lol yeah mach 1's are fast, thanx to there gearing is why it makes em a drivers race.

oh yeah first of all the cobra R, how many people did it fit? 1/2 also was it streetable not really, also the price tag was designed to attack the z06 and it didnt do a good job at it. lol, and the 01 cobra. i believe everyone laughed at the car because it did not put nearly the amount of power as ford claimed they claimed 320 and it didnt even push 300, hence why in 03 they put the supercharger cuz they didnt want to be laughed at. not because svt wanted to see what it can do. they didnt want to be humiliated again so they added the supercharger and severly underrated the car so everyone is happy w/ it. hell lets see an 03 cobra supercharged sells for 32k new, get a 02 fully loaded z28 for 26ish, add a vortec supercharger, then see who will win lol. believe me i'm a car guy all around, i like all cars, i like fox body mustang 5.0's and those were severly underated, ford should have developed on that engine seeing as in how it was OHV,


look at the new hemi's, their new design is based upon the ls1's got to love it. n e ways back to the storry.


LT1's run low 14's w/ a good driver and stickies. power lages in upper rpm's basic bolt on's can possibly get it to consistant mid 13's w/ good driver. good job by the way.