2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

3" Pulley A/F Ratio Graph results...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 23, 2006 | 06:22 PM
  #1  
silverSS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: 05-01-05
Posts: 3,628
Likes: 0
From: USA
3" Pulley A/F Ratio Graph results...

Mods are in sig...3" Pulley and NGK BKR7E plugs gapped at .035...


Reply
Old Jan 23, 2006 | 06:34 PM
  #2  
silverSS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: 05-01-05
Posts: 3,628
Likes: 0
From: USA
what do you guys think...i thought i was running really lean for some reason...i guess im just overly cautious, or worried lol but it seems like it still close to the factory A/F ratio...
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2006 | 07:51 PM
  #3  
Jmc007's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-22-05
Posts: 1,591
Likes: 0
From: Quebec City, Quebec
Is the factory in red and the modded one in blue ?
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2006 | 08:15 PM
  #4  
silverSS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: 05-01-05
Posts: 3,628
Likes: 0
From: USA
I have no idea, i only took the car in with the mods, no stock A/F ratio is on there, idk which one is the A/f ratio it is says the one in red, the sheet is kind of confusing
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2006 | 09:20 PM
  #5  
03gobluecobra's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 01-29-05
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
From: motor city
The bottom line looks ok to me, but the top line does not look good. I guess it would be worthwhile to figure out which is your current a/f.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2006 | 09:24 PM
  #6  
FAST06SS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-07-05
Posts: 964
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis
You want a 12.3 to 12.5 AFR to be at good power levels and reasonably safe richness.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2006 | 09:28 PM
  #7  
Darksun's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-04-05
Posts: 2,040
Likes: 0
From: LongIsland
Originally Posted by FAST06SS
You want a 12.3 to 12.5 AFR to be at good power levels and reasonably safe richness.
I'll agree with the 12.3 to a point. But I know me running that much boost I'd rather be in the high 11's no more than 12.1 if possible.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2006 | 10:38 PM
  #8  
03gobluecobra's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 01-29-05
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
From: motor city
Originally Posted by Darksun280
I'll agree with the 12.3 to a point. But I know me running that much boost I'd rather be in the high 11's no more than 12.1 if possible.
I agree. I will try to be in the 11's when I am pullied.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2006 | 10:47 PM
  #9  
Alex47's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-03-05
Posts: 788
Likes: 0
From: new jerzy
that looks to lean. Iknow that for the srt-4's 11.7 is safe
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2006 | 10:50 PM
  #10  
silverSS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: 05-01-05
Posts: 3,628
Likes: 0
From: USA
but i mean think about it, wouldnt i throw a lean code if it was running lean???, The A/F ratio levels out then drops down around 12 and drops some more pretty quick
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2006 | 11:24 PM
  #11  
2K5SS/SC?'s Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-08-05
Posts: 6,200
Likes: 0
From: Niceville, FL
The lower the number the richer, the higher the number the leaner! Good info though! 14.7:1 is ideal for ideling and regular driving. In boost, 12-13:1 is ideal. Throw advanced or retarded timing in there, and it's another ballgame!
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2006 | 12:15 AM
  #12  
eastcoastz's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-22-05
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 0
From: Jackson, nj
I really don't think that is correct. I've seen a few 3" pulley dynos with more modds then you have and I think the leanest I've seen was 13.1 at 6k rpms.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jesse
Parts
22
Oct 20, 2015 09:56 PM
SSLOW06
Complete Cars
1
Oct 1, 2015 07:21 PM
patooyee
Wanted - What to buy - All categories
0
Oct 1, 2015 01:07 PM
DocSvensk
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
7
Sep 27, 2015 02:24 PM
ChrisTutoki
Parts
0
Sep 24, 2015 08:39 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:01 AM.