General Cobalt General Cobalt, Pursuit, and Ion talk. Post specific discussions in the forums below

Which is better the 2.0 or 2.4?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 29, 2008 | 09:01 PM
  #1  
xander40's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-26-08
Posts: 1,725
Likes: 1
From: Kingwood,TX
Which is better the 2.0 or 2.4?

I'm looking into buying a cobalt here real soon and i can't decide whether or not to just buy the ss/sc or just buy the 2.0 and save the money for mods.

just let me know what yall think.

thanks
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2008 | 09:06 PM
  #2  
Shibito's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-03-08
Posts: 12,211
Likes: 11
From: Michigan
If you like to mod your car a lot buy the 2.4 and turbo it yourself, if not get the 2.0 and it'll already have your turbo.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2008 | 09:07 PM
  #3  
YSUsteven's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-19-06
Posts: 1,381
Likes: 0
From: North Carlonia
Originally Posted by xander40
I'm looking into buying a cobalt here real soon and i can't decide whether or not to just buy the ss/sc or just buy the 2.0 and save the money for mods.

just let me know what yall think.

thanks
You might wona fix that post.

Easy choice

2.0 SC 210 HP
2.0 TC 260 HP
2.4 173 HP
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2008 | 09:08 PM
  #4  
occsdude's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 08-23-07
Posts: 3,938
Likes: 0
From: Haymarket/Norfolk Virginia
tc if you dont want to spend loads on modding
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2008 | 09:08 PM
  #5  
celicacobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-26-05
Posts: 6,375
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Originally Posted by Shibito
If you like to mod your car a lot buy the 2.4 and turbo it yourself, if not get the 2.0 and it'll already have your turbo.
agreed, the 2.0 lnf will not be easily modable when it comes to tuning and internals. the 2.4 is pretty tune friendly.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2008 | 09:09 PM
  #6  
Mss26's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 02-17-08
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 0
From: Stuttgart
the ss/sc is the 2.0

Originally Posted by xander40
I'm looking into buying a cobalt here real soon and i can't decide whether or not to just buy the ss/sc or just buy the 2.0 and save the money for mods.

just let me know what yall think.

thanks
in reference to this

Last edited by Mss26; Jul 29, 2008 at 09:09 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2008 | 09:12 PM
  #7  
cobaltR's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-25-06
Posts: 835
Likes: 0
From: Jaffrey, NH
Originally Posted by YSUsteven
You might wona fix that post.

Easy choice

2.0 SC 210 HP
2.0 TC 260 HP
2.4 173 HP
The 2.0 SC has alittle more than 210hp by the way

If you have money to mod....2.4...but the sc or tc is a pretty good base to start on too...if you can afford the payments.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2008 | 09:20 PM
  #8  
xander40's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-26-08
Posts: 1,725
Likes: 1
From: Kingwood,TX
ya i have until next year to decide which one i want. so i'm hoping to find you used around the time i do choose to buy one. but, as far as money towards modding, i'll probably have anywhere from 300-500 a month to save for modding. and thats without payments. i also have someone who can install everything and i can do decent myself too.

so those charges won't matter just a case of beer and we'll call it even
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2008 | 09:23 PM
  #9  
Perfect.disguise's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-20-08
Posts: 6,780
Likes: 0
From: .
You would get better answers in off topic with a poll.BTW the higher performance trim is usually the best to go with..
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2008 | 10:09 PM
  #10  
thecobaltguy's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 09-25-07
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
From: GA
yeah the TC according to GM is putting off more power but you can get the SC to put out some power also with the right mods of course
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2008 | 10:17 PM
  #11  
Bad05SS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-06-08
Posts: 1,575
Likes: 0
From: Catlett/ newport news VA
i pick the sc because the aftermarket is more established then the tc and if your wanting to buy used then go with the 2.4 ppl like to rag out the 2.0 sc
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2008 | 10:25 PM
  #12  
WhiteSSBalt's Avatar
Not a Sebring
 
Joined: 02-22-07
Posts: 12,863
Likes: 2
From: Northern VA
I chose the 2.4SS to be different, as there are much less heavily modded examples of the 2.4 then there is the of the 2.0 SS/SC.

But if your goal is to go fast for cheap, the 2.0 SS/SC or 2.0 SS/TC.

If you got alot of money and wanna go even faster though, turbo a 2.4.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2008 | 10:38 PM
  #13  
Bad05SS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-06-08
Posts: 1,575
Likes: 0
From: Catlett/ newport news VA
trust me listen to WhiteSSBalt hes got a kick ass n/a 2.4
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2008 | 11:34 PM
  #14  
xander40's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-26-08
Posts: 1,725
Likes: 1
From: Kingwood,TX
ya i'm thinking that 2.4L. it's kinda hard to find one used though. i've yet to find one where i am.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2008 | 12:17 AM
  #15  
BULLETSSMOKE's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-31-07
Posts: 2,765
Likes: 1
From: Houston, TX
If you want an out of the box beast that you probably wont need to fool around with to do what you want, 2.0 turbo. If you want to get into the modding and doing your own work and/or maybe you just love that supercharger whine (like me), go with the 2.0 supercharged (only made in 2005-2007). If you want to get better insurance quotes or you want a bigger engine that sounds cool as hell or if you want to do your own custom turbo/SC, then go with the 2.4.

If I had to choose, I'd go with the supercharged balt. Tons of aftermarket, LOTS of DIY stuff. The whine, easily upgradeable to gain more power. And looks amazing with the 18" rims, full SS body kit, and several other things.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2008 | 12:23 AM
  #16  
xander40's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-26-08
Posts: 1,725
Likes: 1
From: Kingwood,TX
how much did all your mods cost you because i think that's about where i'm going to start when i do get mine
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2008 | 01:01 AM
  #17  
BULLETSSMOKE's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-31-07
Posts: 2,765
Likes: 1
From: Houston, TX
Originally Posted by xander40
how much did all your mods cost you because i think that's about where i'm going to start when i do get mine
i have the 2.4 and i have several mods in different categories.
i have performance mods which ran me about close to $1800 with springs.
appearance mods which came to about $900 including springs.
and a lot of random DIY's bringing the grand total to about $3000.

i may soon get the M62 eaton supercharger kit for $1500 and that'll put me at $4500 but also 250ish whp.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2008 | 01:03 AM
  #18  
xander40's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-26-08
Posts: 1,725
Likes: 1
From: Kingwood,TX
thats not bad. where'd you find most of your parts?
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2008 | 03:07 PM
  #19  
Bad05SS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-06-08
Posts: 1,575
Likes: 0
From: Catlett/ newport news VA
Originally Posted by BULLETSSMOKE
i have the 2.4 and i have several mods in different categories.
i have performance mods which ran me about close to $1800 with springs.
appearance mods which came to about $900 including springs.
and a lot of random DIY's bringing the grand total to about $3000.

i may soon get the M62 eaton supercharger kit for $1500 and that'll put me at $4500 but also 250ish whp.
1500 is alot for only 250hp thats why i got a sc
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2008 | 06:05 PM
  #20  
Evil C's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-26-07
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
From: chicago
1500 for 100 hp is not alot.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2008 | 06:09 PM
  #21  
Acey's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-02-07
Posts: 8,976
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton
Originally Posted by Evil C
1500 for 100 hp is not alot.
x2. That's a solid price for a 65% gain in hp.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2008 | 06:18 PM
  #22  
chevysssc's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 02-12-07
Posts: 2,511
Likes: 0
From: new jersey
why not buy a sssc and turbo it theres a dude from ny with 411 whp on stock internals
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2008 | 06:18 PM
  #23  
AzulitoAlero's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 01-09-08
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
From: Garner NC
2.0...

you will see the 2.0 guys on here bitch about reliability sometimes, but they dont have anything on 2.4's..

I had an older style (1999) GM 2.4 in my last car.. and it was the worst ******* motor ever. I babied it to death but i had to have the tow truck man on speed dial.


the 2.0 comes out of the box with forced induction, you dont need any mods to go fast, you will love it regardless. Also, since it is the highest trim available, you get all the neat extras like leather seats and stuff. love love love my 2.0!!!!!
Only bad thing is parts availability, its not a common powertrain so prepare to wait for parts.. I always have mine overnighted from Lansing =) We have a great relationship with the local GM parts department.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2008 | 06:43 PM
  #24  
olivecj's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-12-07
Posts: 1,380
Likes: 0
From: nova scotia
Originally Posted by AzulitoAlero
2.0...

you will see the 2.0 guys on here bitch about reliability sometimes, but they dont have anything on 2.4's..

I had an older style (1999) GM 2.4 in my last car.. and it was the worst ******* motor ever. I babied it to death but i had to have the tow truck man on speed dial.


the 2.0 comes out of the box with forced induction, you dont need any mods to go fast, you will love it regardless. Also, since it is the highest trim available, you get all the neat extras like leather seats and stuff. love love love my 2.0!!!!!
Only bad thing is parts availability, its not a common powertrain so prepare to wait for parts.. I always have mine overnighted from Lansing =) We have a great relationship with the local GM parts department.
I agree the older 2.4 twincam engines were not the greatest. However your wrong with the new 2.4 ecotec engine. Its just as strong as the 2.0 ecotec in the ss/sc.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2008 | 06:56 PM
  #25  
Doc's Avatar
Doc
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-11-05
Posts: 9,438
Likes: 0
From: Oceanside, Ca
I'll sell you my car with hptuners and a laptop to tune it with
I have lost my mind too
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:13 AM.