2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

Dyno'd my SS/SC ... 7/19/05

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 19, 2005 | 07:45 PM
  #1  
brifriinc's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 07-05-05
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
From: HP, IL
Dyno'd my SS/SC ... 7/19/05

Hey guys! Im excited.... i dyno'd my car today and I'm very happy how it turned out.... This was at 93 degrees F , With 93 octane......see for yourself...


1st Pull....4th Gear...



2nd Pull...3rd Gear...



3rd Pull... 3rd Gear...

Reply
Old Jul 19, 2005 | 07:46 PM
  #2  
Ljavy17's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-01-05
Posts: 3,622
Likes: 0
From: Miami
cant see nothing bro, wutd u get.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2005 | 07:48 PM
  #3  
brifriinc's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 07-05-05
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
From: HP, IL
check out the signature....
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2005 | 07:51 PM
  #4  
chevy_cobalt_tuner's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 07-18-05
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: Canada
**** i seriously doubt that you got 120hp with a stock ss s/c
thats a 15hp difference then the manufacture says (GM)
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2005 | 07:56 PM
  #5  
MarcS's Avatar
The Stig
 
Joined: 05-11-05
Posts: 6,484
Likes: 1
From: New York
Fix your dyno sheet images so we can beleive you
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2005 | 07:57 PM
  #6  
DanM's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 03-25-05
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
From: Canada
220... sweet. Get them graphs working! How many miles you got on er?
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2005 | 08:12 PM
  #7  
clownhair's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 07-14-05
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
From: michigan
Originally Posted by chevy_cobalt_tuner
**** i seriously doubt that you got 120hp with a stock ss s/c
thats a 15hp difference then the manufacture says (GM)
I know of at least 20 redline guys who have dynoed 220.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2005 | 08:17 PM
  #8  
selfinfliction's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 06-23-05
Posts: 8,004
Likes: 0
From: ky
Originally Posted by chevy_cobalt_tuner
**** i seriously doubt that you got 120hp with a stock ss s/c
thats a 15hp difference then the manufacture says (GM)



and i bet his dyno sheet goes up to 5600rpm max



i'm not even gonna touch this one
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2005 | 08:34 PM
  #9  
brifriinc's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 07-05-05
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
From: HP, IL
is my signiture picture working?? because there working on my comps....
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2005 | 08:37 PM
  #10  
Voodoosoup's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 10-01-04
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
From: In a house
I can see em' just fine.... Seems like you're in the ballpark where everybody else has been.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2005 | 08:39 PM
  #11  
selfinfliction's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 06-23-05
Posts: 8,004
Likes: 0
From: ky
Originally Posted by brifriinc
is my signiture picture working?? because there working on my comps....

if you're talking abotu dyno sheets showing up, no they are not working. only the numbers you typed up are showing
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2005 | 09:00 PM
  #12  
brifriinc's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 07-05-05
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
From: HP, IL
hopefully these work...man can't believe you guys are doubting the power of the cobalt SS!! lol






Reply
Old Jul 19, 2005 | 09:05 PM
  #13  
selfinfliction's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 06-23-05
Posts: 8,004
Likes: 0
From: ky
i never doubted.. it was th eother genious lol....


i was just letting you know they didn't worked before, but the ones you just posted did


that torque curve in third is much different from all the other pulls i've seen.... (even your 4th gear pull)... what makes that change so much
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2005 | 09:08 PM
  #14  
brifriinc's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 07-05-05
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
From: HP, IL
Originally Posted by selfinfliction
i never doubted.. it was th eother genious lol....


i was just letting you know they didn't worked before, but the ones you just posted did
Cool.... oh and lettin ya know.... your pic doesn't work for me in your sig... lol
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2005 | 09:20 PM
  #15  
wesmanw02's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 12-13-04
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
Awesome numbers man, thanks for posting.

212 HP at the wheels is very impressive - especially considering that was your 4th gear pull, and 4th is slightly below a 1:1 gear ratio - which makes it a disadvantage.

I figured the 93 degree temps would have some effect on the power output, but it seems to make little difference.
Gotta love that intercooler
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2005 | 09:21 PM
  #16  
brifriinc's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 07-05-05
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
From: HP, IL
Originally Posted by DanM
220... sweet. Get them graphs working! How many miles you got on er?
i dyno'd it with 1288 miles
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2005 | 09:24 PM
  #17  
MarcS's Avatar
The Stig
 
Joined: 05-11-05
Posts: 6,484
Likes: 1
From: New York
Originally Posted by wesmanw02
Awesome numbers man, thanks for posting.

212 HP at the wheels is very impressive - especially considering that was your 4th gear pull, and 4th is slightly below a 1:1 gear ratio - which makes it a disadvantage.

I figured the 93 degree temps would have some effect on the power output, but it seems to make little difference.
Gotta love that intercooler
212hp is right on target. You can't rely on 3rd gear pulls unfortunately
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2005 | 09:29 PM
  #18  
zinner's Avatar
Moderator Alumni
 
Joined: 08-26-04
Posts: 4,944
Likes: 2
From: RTP, NC
What kind of dyno was the measurement taken on. Never seen a print out like that?
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2005 | 09:37 PM
  #19  
brifriinc's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 07-05-05
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
From: HP, IL
Originally Posted by zinner
What kind of dyno was the measurement taken on. Never seen a print out like that?
It was a stationary 2wd dyno.... thats bout all i know bout it lol
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2005 | 09:38 PM
  #20  
brifriinc's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 07-05-05
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
From: HP, IL
Originally Posted by MarcS
212hp is right on target. You can't rely on 3rd gear pulls unfortunately
what do you mean? im still gettin the same power read from 3rd arent I?
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2005 | 09:43 PM
  #21  
MarcS's Avatar
The Stig
 
Joined: 05-11-05
Posts: 6,484
Likes: 1
From: New York
Originally Posted by brifriinc
what do you mean? im still gettin the same power read from 3rd arent I?
The number closest to a 1:1 ratio is the best projection of hp. 3rd gear is 1.35:1 and 4th is 0.98:1.

So you'll show higher numbers with the greater ratios.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2005 | 09:44 PM
  #22  
brifriinc's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 07-05-05
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
From: HP, IL
oh i gotcha...
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2005 | 09:55 PM
  #23  
wesmanw02's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 12-13-04
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
Originally Posted by MarcS
212hp is right on target. You can't rely on 3rd gear pulls unfortunately
Yea I agree. The problem with 3rd is that its above the "perfect" 1:1 ratio, which makes it too optamistic. So 4th is just right, being that its a 0.98:1 ratio, its damn close to perfect. So the numbers might be (very) slightly lower, but overall they are right on target
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2005 | 10:51 PM
  #24  
CobaltSS313's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-03-05
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Yah so basically he's right around what everyone else is getting....212HP isnt bad for stock....I got a K&N filter and i still only put down 209.5HP which sucks
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2005 | 12:11 AM
  #25  
zinner's Avatar
Moderator Alumni
 
Joined: 08-26-04
Posts: 4,944
Likes: 2
From: RTP, NC
Originally Posted by MarcS
The number closest to a 1:1 ratio is the best projection of hp. 3rd gear is 1.35:1 and 4th is 0.98:1.

So you'll show higher numbers with the greater ratios.

Those are the number for the regular cobalt 5 speed. Don't trust the GM website


The FGP F35 transmission in the SS/SC
1st- 3.38:1
2nd- 1.76:1
3rd- 1.18:1
4th- 0.89:1
5th- 0.70:1
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:28 PM.