Dyno'd my SS/SC ... 7/19/05
07-19-2005, 07:45 PM
#1
New Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 07-05-05
Location: HP, IL
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dyno'd my SS/SC ... 7/19/05
Hey guys! Im excited.... i dyno'd my car today and I'm very happy how it turned out.... This was at 93 degrees F , With 93 octane......see for yourself...
1st Pull....4th Gear...
2nd Pull...3rd Gear...
3rd Pull... 3rd Gear...
1st Pull....4th Gear...
2nd Pull...3rd Gear...
3rd Pull... 3rd Gear...
07-19-2005, 08:12 PM
#7
New Member
Join Date: 07-14-05
Location: michigan
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by chevy_cobalt_tuner
**** i seriously doubt that you got 120hp with a stock ss s/c
thats a 15hp difference then the manufacture says (GM)
thats a 15hp difference then the manufacture says (GM)
07-19-2005, 08:17 PM
#8
Banned
Join Date: 06-23-05
Location: ky
Posts: 8,032
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by chevy_cobalt_tuner
**** i seriously doubt that you got 120hp with a stock ss s/c
thats a 15hp difference then the manufacture says (GM)
thats a 15hp difference then the manufacture says (GM)
and i bet his dyno sheet goes up to 5600rpm max
i'm not even gonna touch this one
07-19-2005, 08:39 PM
#11
Banned
Join Date: 06-23-05
Location: ky
Posts: 8,032
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by brifriinc
is my signiture picture working?? because there working on my comps....
if you're talking abotu dyno sheets showing up, no they are not working. only the numbers you typed up are showing
07-19-2005, 09:05 PM
#13
Banned
Join Date: 06-23-05
Location: ky
Posts: 8,032
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i never doubted.. it was th eother genious lol....
i was just letting you know they didn't worked before, but the ones you just posted did
that torque curve in third is much different from all the other pulls i've seen.... (even your 4th gear pull)... what makes that change so much
i was just letting you know they didn't worked before, but the ones you just posted did
that torque curve in third is much different from all the other pulls i've seen.... (even your 4th gear pull)... what makes that change so much
07-19-2005, 09:08 PM
#14
New Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 07-05-05
Location: HP, IL
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by selfinfliction
i never doubted.. it was th eother genious lol....
i was just letting you know they didn't worked before, but the ones you just posted did
i was just letting you know they didn't worked before, but the ones you just posted did
07-19-2005, 09:20 PM
#15
Banned
Join Date: 12-13-04
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Awesome numbers man, thanks for posting.
212 HP at the wheels is very impressive - especially considering that was your 4th gear pull, and 4th is slightly below a 1:1 gear ratio - which makes it a disadvantage.
I figured the 93 degree temps would have some effect on the power output, but it seems to make little difference.
Gotta love that intercooler
212 HP at the wheels is very impressive - especially considering that was your 4th gear pull, and 4th is slightly below a 1:1 gear ratio - which makes it a disadvantage.
I figured the 93 degree temps would have some effect on the power output, but it seems to make little difference.
Gotta love that intercooler
07-19-2005, 09:24 PM
#17
Originally Posted by wesmanw02
Awesome numbers man, thanks for posting.
212 HP at the wheels is very impressive - especially considering that was your 4th gear pull, and 4th is slightly below a 1:1 gear ratio - which makes it a disadvantage.
I figured the 93 degree temps would have some effect on the power output, but it seems to make little difference.
Gotta love that intercooler
212 HP at the wheels is very impressive - especially considering that was your 4th gear pull, and 4th is slightly below a 1:1 gear ratio - which makes it a disadvantage.
I figured the 93 degree temps would have some effect on the power output, but it seems to make little difference.
Gotta love that intercooler
07-19-2005, 09:37 PM
#19
New Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 07-05-05
Location: HP, IL
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by zinner
What kind of dyno was the measurement taken on. Never seen a print out like that?
07-19-2005, 09:38 PM
#20
New Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 07-05-05
Location: HP, IL
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by MarcS
212hp is right on target. You can't rely on 3rd gear pulls unfortunately
07-19-2005, 09:43 PM
#21
Originally Posted by brifriinc
what do you mean? im still gettin the same power read from 3rd arent I?
So you'll show higher numbers with the greater ratios.
07-19-2005, 09:55 PM
#23
Banned
Join Date: 12-13-04
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by MarcS
212hp is right on target. You can't rely on 3rd gear pulls unfortunately
07-19-2005, 10:51 PM
#24
Senior Member
Yah so basically he's right around what everyone else is getting....212HP isnt bad for stock....I got a K&N filter and i still only put down 209.5HP which sucks
07-20-2005, 12:11 AM
#25
Moderator Alumni
Originally Posted by MarcS
The number closest to a 1:1 ratio is the best projection of hp. 3rd gear is 1.35:1 and 4th is 0.98:1.
So you'll show higher numbers with the greater ratios.
So you'll show higher numbers with the greater ratios.
Those are the number for the regular cobalt 5 speed. Don't trust the GM website
The FGP F35 transmission in the SS/SC
1st- 3.38:1
2nd- 1.76:1
3rd- 1.18:1
4th- 0.89:1
5th- 0.70:1