Magnaflow or DC Exhaust?
Magnaflow or DC Exhaust?
I am deffintly getting an exhaust system with in a few weeks and after researcing ( mostly forums). There are only 2 systems that i know of. And that is th DC sports exhaust and also the magnaflow exhaust. I would like to know if anybody know which will flow better? And which will sound better? After looking under my car today I relized there is A LOT of bends and it could deffintly flow a lot better. Im pretty sure I saw one bend that was under 90 degrees ( In which it actully flows back a lilttle bit twords the front of the car). All i have for links are these
magnaflow
http://www.magnaflow.com/04sound/04sport.asp
and the DC sports..
http://www.ptuning.com/html/Item-Des...delDesc=Cobalt
and let it begin..
magnaflow
http://www.magnaflow.com/04sound/04sport.asp
and the DC sports..
http://www.ptuning.com/html/Item-Des...delDesc=Cobalt
and let it begin..
I'm going with the DC sports exhaust. I can't seem to figure out why you would want to put a dual exhaust system on a 4-cylinder car. Yeah it looks cool, but it doesn't give you any added performance benefits.
Due to the single exhaust mani, the only hinder in performance would be the added weight., besides that the "y" that seperates the 2 exhaust outlets should not due any damage to the performance at all. As far as it looking rice, a matter of opinion, especially if a rear valance would be added that had two exhaust cutouts like the rksport, how does it look to have two holes for exhaust, and only one side filled in?
Originally Posted by edaddee
Due to the single exhaust mani, the only hinder in performance would be the added weight., besides that the "y" that seperates the 2 exhaust outlets should not due any damage to the performance at all. As far as it looking rice, a matter of opinion, especially if a rear valance would be added that had two exhaust cutouts like the rksport, how does it look to have two holes for exhaust, and only one side filled in?
better chance of hurting than helping. exhuast works with pressure. gasses exit the head from high pressure filling lower pressure. your exhuast directs it out the back. too many exits, paths, or too large of pipe effects the sort of "vacuum". so yes size matters when it comes to exhuast. too large will hinder just as too small. i increased mine to where it flows 2" all the way back with a magnaflow muffler. resignator left in tact with good power gain and not-so annoying bumble bee sound.
Originally Posted by forcedgminduction
better chance of hurting than helping. exhuast works with pressure. gasses exit the head from high pressure filling lower pressure. your exhuast directs it out the back. too many exits, paths, or too large of pipe effects the sort of "vacuum". so yes size matters when it comes to exhuast. too large will hinder just as too small. i increased mine to where it flows 2" all the way back with a magnaflow muffler. resignator left in tact with good power gain and not-so annoying bumble bee sound.
Also, doesn't matter if you go 2.5" or 3", if you have a restrictive header to begin with, there really is no material gains from a bigger exhaust without changing the header (10 hp at most).
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





