2.4L LE5 Performance Tech 16 valve 171 hp EcoTec with 163 lb-ft of torque

LE5 Performance Future?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 10, 2005 | 07:53 PM
  #1  
Soopahmahn's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 07-31-05
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Malvern, PA
LE5 Performance Future?

Hey all, I'm a newbie to this whole sport compact tuning bit, and I know the LE5 is a pretty new engine, but I wanted to know what some of you think about the future of LE5 tuning is going to look like? I'm really interested in adding about 100hp to my '06 SS Coupe while maintaining its sleeper/mild-mannered city car facade.

More specifically, if a turbo/super bolt-on becomes available, what's going to need beefing up first - the connecting rods/camshafts etc., or the transmission (it's the 4-spd auto)?? I figure since this is the "2.4L Performance" thread, someone has to bring this up.

Reply
Old Aug 10, 2005 | 08:02 PM
  #2  
stlurbanpunk's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-25-04
Posts: 1,278
Likes: 0
From: STL
well a turbocharger is going to be available, but I dont know whrn, i guess some time after they relase the turbo solstic/sky. I think the potential is going to be as big as the original 2.2 ecotec, but sound a lot nicer. I love the exhaust tone of that engine (2.4). after you rev the engine the rpm's drop a bit and it just sounds awsome;IMO. I think all the standard stuff like short shifter, intake, exhaust, headers will all be available before next summer.
I dont know weather i would chose a super or turbo. but 280 hp/tq sounds insane!
good luck and keep us posted!
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2005 | 12:51 AM
  #3  
Soopahmahn's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 07-31-05
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Malvern, PA
The exhaust tone is way sexy. Who knows what brand/style/setup of cat-back system will offer a similarly badass sound while boosting performance? I refuse to let my car sound like a rolling fart - what is it that makes that godawful lawnmower noise on ricers?
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2005 | 01:05 AM
  #4  
glockglade's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 06-25-05
Posts: 1,076
Likes: 0
From: Palm Beach
Cheap Pep-Boys mufflers. My silver SS has 18 axis 7 mod rims, eibach sportline springs and a custom apex n1 3" cat back exhaust! I think it sounds awesome.
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2005 | 02:09 AM
  #5  
xonic's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-13-05
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
From: Lawrence/K.C
I'd bet money on the tranny needing to be upgraded first.. I know on the cav's they are only good to about 255 ft/lbs before you'll cry all the way home.
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2005 | 12:42 PM
  #6  
stlurbanpunk's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-25-04
Posts: 1,278
Likes: 0
From: STL
Originally Posted by Soopahmahn
I refuse to let my car sound like a rolling fart - what is it that makes that godawful lawnmower noise on ricers?
I think the small engine combined with the free flowing exhaust makes it sound like that.
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2005 | 01:27 AM
  #7  
avro206's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-17-04
Posts: 2,994
Likes: 0
From: Calgary Alberta Canada
Sure couldn't do much boost with a stock compression ratio.

I'd like to see what the engine is capable of NA.

Hopefully exhaust, CAI and a header would be coming out soon.
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2005 | 11:26 AM
  #8  
Soopahmahn's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 07-31-05
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Malvern, PA
Yeah my thoughts are currently centered around the idea of getting higher-strength lower compression ratio pistons (~9:1?) and using whatever supercharger comes out in the future. I was wondering, if you have a supercharger, is there any benefit to using a special intake? Maybe just one with a big fat opening would allow the charger to turn up more quickly? Or is the only benefit w/ CAI's etc. for a N/A engine?

BTW if anyone knows how to get 300hp out of this engine without a blower, I'm all about it... durability is my #1 concern since I don't have money to put back together a broken engine, and I'd like to be able to get to work every morning on time :P

BTW^2, tried to race an STi just for the hell of it, to see how bad I'd get spanked, but the guy wasn't going to bite. He was this asian guy with hiliariously huge anime-character hair. Made me smile.
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2005 | 11:36 AM
  #9  
avro206's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-17-04
Posts: 2,994
Likes: 0
From: Calgary Alberta Canada
300hp out of a 2.4L NA engine would be akin to a race car engine. Your talking about 125hp per litre! (although that would shut up all thise Honda boys who live by that stat! )

The most Powerful NA engines in production can't do that. the new Fearri F430 makes 112hp/litre.

A forced induction engine can make over 100hp litre alot easier.

I was thinking a 30-40hp boost using some bolts ons (maybe a cam as well)

But a lower comp ratio witha S/C would be the bestr way to go---it would preserve and increase low wnd torque.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2005 | 06:53 PM
  #10  
phxSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-20-05
Posts: 2,621
Likes: 0
From: Buckeye, Az
with a 10.4:1 compression, you're looking at about 9lbs of boost max out of FI.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2005 | 07:05 PM
  #11  
Soopahmahn's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 07-31-05
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Malvern, PA
Yeah I didn't think it was possible but why not. Anybody thinking about NOS? Would a wet kit with only like a 50-shot and the appropriate controls be pretty safe?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KMO43
Front Page News
33
Jan 12, 2016 12:01 AM
Jesse
Parts
15
Oct 13, 2015 09:32 PM
nathan112i
Featured Car Showcase
41
Sep 30, 2015 07:12 PM
KMO43
Featured Car Showcase
37
Sep 27, 2015 08:53 PM
GBRunner24
Featured Car Showcase
3
Sep 26, 2015 06:44 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:21 PM.