2.2L L61 Performance Tech 16 valve 145 hp EcoTec with 155 lb-ft of torque

Turbo Charging My 2.2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 19, 2007 | 10:44 PM
  #1  
laserelectric's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 02-26-07
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
From: New Mexico
Turbo Charging My 2.2

I am looking for a little information from some of the more knowledgeable members of the site. While on here, I have seen quiet a few companies putting out a turbo/tune for our car now...However, each has a down side...My question is this, which one is TRULEY the best? Which can I really on to put out the MOST power, and boost, while not forcing me to get a new engine all the time (i.e. blow outs)...? Hit me back with suggestions and links, also any mods that will need to accompany that particular kit...I have been reading up on the Alpine, and it comes WITH the needed tune...
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2007 | 10:50 PM
  #2  
Halfcent's Avatar
I'm old school
 
Joined: 02-16-05
Posts: 6,905
Likes: 3
From: Nashville
Presently Alpine is the only retail kit for the car. Garrett is supposed to have their kit in spring. It will also have tuning.

I don't like the Alpine kit personally. It uses a piggyback. It also injects fuel into the plastic intake manifold which should never be done.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2007 | 10:56 PM
  #3  
laserelectric's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 02-26-07
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
From: New Mexico
Originally Posted by Halfcent
Presently Alpine is the only retail kit for the car. Garrett is supposed to have their kit in spring. It will also have tuning.

I don't like the Alpine kit personally. It uses a piggyback. It also injects fuel into the plastic intake manifold which should never be done.
Alright, that was what I was hearing...Yeah, the other one I was looking at WAS Garret...So I think I may steer clear of the Alpine...
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 12:09 AM
  #4  
LewiSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-17-06
Posts: 872
Likes: 0
From: Denver Metro
Originally Posted by Halfcent
Presently Alpine is the only retail kit for the car. Garrett is supposed to have their kit in spring. It will also have tuning.

I don't like the Alpine kit personally. It uses a piggyback. It also injects fuel into the plastic intake manifold which should never be done.
That's why there are different approaches, and different suppliers! We each have our preferences. Isn't capitalism wonderful? I, for one, am glad of the (admittedly small) selection out there.
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 10:51 AM
  #5  
laserelectric's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 02-26-07
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
From: New Mexico
Originally Posted by LewiSS
That's why there are different approaches, and different suppliers! We each have our preferences. Isn't capitalism wonderful? I, for one, am glad of the (admittedly small) selection out there.
Yeah dude, I am FINE with a lack of selection, as long as the selection available is quality. Since I haven't used ANY of the kits yet, I have no preference. I simply want some accounts from different people about the different ways they went about doing it. Also, I want some SUGGESTIONS as to which kits would benefit me most...Most horse power, torque, and boost gain, with the least chances of sacrificing something else. For example, someone was talking about the Alpine kit, and how it MAY be responsible for several engine blow outs? Then, there is the Garret kit that is coming out...It is looking pretty good, it also isn't boasting rediculously high numbers? So I am lost...

P.S.
The term "piggyback" is COMPLETELY new to me. I haven't ever heard it before when talking about computer tunes? Can someone explain that, AND its pros or cons?

P.S.S.
Has anyone got any advice about getting sponsorships, or hook-ups on parts? That would really help...
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 11:07 AM
  #6  
CobaltBurst's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-08-05
Posts: 2,152
Likes: 0
From: U.S.A.
there is no computer tune on a 2.2 right now... i piggy back is a diff. cpu that tricks the current computer.

and btw... lack of selection = A. your stuck with using those companies (they dont have to be quality) B. Higher prices...
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 11:25 AM
  #7  
IonNinja's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-29-05
Posts: 7,915
Likes: 0
From: AZ
personally...I would wait.

One kit has no tuning and the other uses a 5th injector and piggyback. I'd wait til there are better options available before I started shopping for a turbo setup.
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 11:32 AM
  #8  
CobaltBurst's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-08-05
Posts: 2,152
Likes: 0
From: U.S.A.
yea everything out right now is "rigged" to work imo.... you need proper tuning tools to do the job right.
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 12:32 PM
  #9  
LewiSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-17-06
Posts: 872
Likes: 0
From: Denver Metro
Originally Posted by laserelectric
Yeah dude, I am FINE with a lack of selection, as long as the selection available is quality. Since I haven't used ANY of the kits yet, I have no preference. I simply want some accounts from different people about the different ways they went about doing it. Also, I want some SUGGESTIONS as to which kits would benefit me most...Most horse power, torque, and boost gain, with the least chances of sacrificing something else. For example, someone was talking about the Alpine kit, and how it MAY be responsible for several engine blow outs? Then, there is the Garret kit that is coming out...It is looking pretty good, it also isn't boasting rediculously high numbers? So I am lost...

P.S.
The term "piggyback" is COMPLETELY new to me. I haven't ever heard it before when talking about computer tunes? Can someone explain that, AND its pros or cons?

P.S.S.
Has anyone got any advice about getting sponsorships, or hook-ups on parts? That would really help...
The piggy-back approach isn't inherently bad. It's been a staple in the aftermarket turbo world for some time. Corky Bell in his book Maximum Boost talks about them, and not in a negative light.

While the stock MAP sensor will go about 1 bar positive (in other words, even though the stock car doesn't have FI, the sensor seems to be able to tell the computer about boost), and you can use HPTune to increase fuel under boost, there's some question about whether HPTune can use MAP readings to decrease the timing curve (not sure if those two parameters can be tied together in that way, or, logically, whether HPTune can tell the computer IF BOOST = X, TIMING = -Y). One thing that the piggy-back used by Alpine does is adjust advance through "tricking" the stock PCM. It also increases fuel through the 5th injector (again, a system used in the past by other kits on other cars - Corky Bell mentions it in his book, but isn't as enamored of it as some other authors). BTW, that same piggy-back can be used to increase fuel through the existing injector set-up, by adding bigger injectors and wiring the piggy-back differently. Alpine was talking to me about that a few days ago.
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 01:29 PM
  #10  
TCarter's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 04-16-06
Posts: 1,960
Likes: 0
From: Sterling, IL
Alpine Kit: http://www.tntautosport.com/store/in...ea8a15412661a1

Garrett Kit: http://www.tntautosport.com/store/in...ea8a15412661a1


Garrett kit is more about quality, but offers no tuning solution, and in turn is better for the 2.4L since tuning is available.

The Alpine kit is specificly for the 2.2 as tuning is available and included via the SMT-6 piggy back, but lacks in some areas (plastic intake manifold), but still works like a charm.
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 05:25 PM
  #11  
07cobaltkid's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 01-21-07
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: atco
does the 2.4L SS have a plastic manifold???
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 07:54 PM
  #12  
laserelectric's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 02-26-07
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
From: New Mexico
Alright, cool, I am starting to get the information I was looking for. Right now, I am thinking I will simply wait. I mean, the two kits available I know about, seem alright in one light, but down in another...I am REALLY aching for some more horses, but I guess I will have to patient. i finally grasp the concept behind the piggy back...The one other thing I was wondering about it was this: (I heard it SLIGHTLY mentioned on another thread)-Instead of using the fifth injector, what if you simply swapped in bigger injectors, and still ran 4? Or, would you simply be better off replacing the stock manifolds? I was thinking of ordering the GMPP performane manifolds...
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2007 | 06:28 PM
  #13  
xCobalt05x's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-15-06
Posts: 3,765
Likes: 0
From: Pocomoke City, MD
Originally Posted by Halfcent
Presently Alpine is the only retail kit for the car. Garrett is supposed to have their kit in spring. It will also have tuning.

I don't like the Alpine kit personally. It uses a piggyback. It also injects fuel into the plastic intake manifold which should never be done.
not to mention a guy i know just blew apart his cobalt plastic intake manifold w/ only 7 psi on his turbo kit.

here is the instal procedure for the piggy back turbo system

http://alpine-developments.us/Alpine...2520cooker.pdf

the guy w/ this on his 2.2 cobalt is Emo for the masses on my myspace page. the piggyback system being use is the one i have posted this link to the SMT-6. Its $400 and it comes with tuning software and wiring harness for plug and play w/ our computers.

ohhh, here is a link for a CNC aluminum version of our plastic intake manifold made by Venom.

http://www.venom-performance.com/nf/html/prodtoc.cfm

I'll even put in a picture of the venom intake manifold replacement for our plastic one



Originally Posted by laserelectric
Alright, cool, I am starting to get the information I was looking for. Right now, I am thinking I will simply wait. I mean, the two kits available I know about, seem alright in one light, but down in another...I am REALLY aching for some more horses, but I guess I will have to patient. i finally grasp the concept behind the piggy back...The one other thing I was wondering about it was this: (I heard it SLIGHTLY mentioned on another thread)-Instead of using the fifth injector, what if you simply swapped in bigger injectors, and still ran 4? Or, would you simply be better off replacing the stock manifolds? I was thinking of ordering the GMPP performane manifolds...
the problem with going w/ bigger injectors is our ECU not being able to work them properly. in the install i didnt see anything about hooking up the SMT-6 to the injecotr system. it simply just adds in the 5th injector. i might be wrong about this and its not a full complete install guide.

Last edited by xCobalt05x; Mar 21, 2007 at 06:28 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2007 | 09:47 PM
  #14  
celicacobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-26-05
Posts: 6,375
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
i dont think that venom intake is for sale anymore, but hahn racecraft has one and i think alpine is making one as well.
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2007 | 10:32 PM
  #15  
Halfcent's Avatar
I'm old school
 
Joined: 02-16-05
Posts: 6,905
Likes: 3
From: Nashville
Concerning the plastic manifold on the 2.4 LE5, it wouldn't be an issue as long as no fuel is passed through it. The Garrett kit will more then likely replace the stock injectors with larger units, so the plastic manifold would be fine.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Supercharged06SS
08-10 SS Turbocharged General Discussion
21
Dec 11, 2022 04:47 PM
taintedred07
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
32
May 28, 2022 03:47 AM
KMO43
Front Page News
33
Jan 12, 2016 12:01 AM
maliki778
Dyno Results
4
Oct 1, 2015 07:39 PM
KMO43
Featured Car Showcase
37
Sep 27, 2015 08:53 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:48 AM.