2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

2.0 LSJ Head, Cams and valve information ...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 3, 2007 | 02:23 PM
  #1  
Jmc007's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-22-05
Posts: 1,591
Likes: 0
From: Quebec City, Quebec
2.0 LSJ Head, Cams and valve information ...

http://tunersource.gmblogs.com/Racer...FO-SHEET-2.pdf

http://tunersource.gmblogs.com/Racer...0SHEET.doc.pdf

And just see the flowchart on the right side of the following page :

http://www.m2race.com/product_specs.asp?ID=5#

EDITED : GMPP states the stock head to be efficient up to only 275WHP (325BHP).

And if you can read between the lines, now it's time to put your hard-earned money at the right place ... head porting, cams, valve springs. Then only after that get a good flowing header, downpipe and catback. Yeah yeah don't forget HPTuner ...

Best regards,

Last edited by Jmc007; Aug 15, 2007 at 01:32 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2007 | 02:26 PM
  #2  
shawns94's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 04-16-07
Posts: 695
Likes: 0
From: Fort Leavenworth
Originally Posted by Jmc007
http://tunersource.gmblogs.com/Racer...FO-SHEET-2.pdf

And just see the flowchart on the right side of the following page :

http://www.m2race.com/product_specs.asp?ID=5#

Both links read together validates the total flow of Stock LSJ head to be only 600 CFM, thus efficient to only 275BHP or 240WHP. More than 280WHP on stock head is clearly unefficient.

And if you can read between the lines, now it's time to put your hard-earned money at the right place ... head porting, cams, valve springs. Then only after that get a good flowing header, downpipe and catback. Yeah yeah don't forget HPTuner ...

Best regards,
That is exactly what I was thinking. Thus the reason I bought the stuff for it. Nice find and people should really look into doing this before going to a different FI. I mean how do you think the N/A guys get more power. More flow = more Power.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2007 | 02:28 PM
  #3  
Onyxd04Redline's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 06-11-07
Posts: 5,417
Likes: 0
From: Az
And people say porting the head is a waste of money.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2007 | 02:29 PM
  #4  
lsjwannabe's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 01-23-06
Posts: 10,731
Likes: 0
From: on here
whoever says that is dumb
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2007 | 02:30 PM
  #5  
whitted2268's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 12-14-05
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
From: Earth
These are my next mods=), through JBody
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2007 | 02:36 PM
  #6  
lsjwannabe's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 01-23-06
Posts: 10,731
Likes: 0
From: on here
i would advise agianst that if at all possible
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2007 | 02:43 PM
  #7  
firestorm's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-20-06
Posts: 1,269
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton
will gm's race head just bolt on? thats about 1k or so.
i priced out the whole race motor, well just the block, pistons, pins, head, shafts, cams, and rods. i got to about 9K and quit as the wife gave me the tap on the shoulder. so im guessing it would cost about 15k installed, including all the small stuff, and that would gain about 50 whp? but it would be far more tweakable. then the tranny would blow apart.
rinse repeat. i think the balt is a poor choice if you want a serious ground pounder.
this is my last fwd, chevy needs another car that is blown. the camaro prolly wont be.
400 hp is FA for a fast car. how many guys here can run with a base vette? gm better get with the program/.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2007 | 02:44 PM
  #8  
Jmc007's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-22-05
Posts: 1,591
Likes: 0
From: Quebec City, Quebec
Originally Posted by Onyxd04Redline
And people say porting the head is a waste of money.

Yeah and if you spend some money in the internals, ported heads, cams, just make sure it will be optimised with proper bolt-ons (exhaust) parts. Don't choke this marvelous ported LSJ with crap stock exhaust parts.

Like I've seen one user with a ported head AND cams, but still have a 500 CFM catback ...

Or another one with a lot of bolt-ons and 2,6" pulley, but still with the stock exhaust manifold !

Don't get me wrong : We all learn together, that's why I made a lot of mistake myself and spent a lot of money, still running the stock DP for one + year because not having enough money to upgrade. But that's past history ...
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2007 | 02:47 PM
  #9  
Area47's Avatar
Rent me! per hour
 
Joined: 03-22-07
Posts: 24,161
Likes: 20
From: Still fixing others mistakes.
Originally Posted by Onyxd04Redline
And people say porting the head is a waste of money.
nope, said that since day one
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2007 | 02:50 PM
  #10  
firestorm's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-20-06
Posts: 1,269
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton
area, would you bolt on the gm race head? with adding better springs.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2007 | 02:52 PM
  #11  
Area47's Avatar
Rent me! per hour
 
Joined: 03-22-07
Posts: 24,161
Likes: 20
From: Still fixing others mistakes.
Originally Posted by firestorm
area, would you bolt on the gm race head? with adding better springs.
depends on my budget really.

valvetrain is where i would start actually. cams, springs, retainers. or just find a spare 2.0 head and build it up from there. more or less over time, rather than jumping head long into it.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2007 | 02:59 PM
  #12  
shawns94's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 04-16-07
Posts: 695
Likes: 0
From: Fort Leavenworth
Well I put together a nice kit for myself.

P&P head....$1000.00
Valve Springs and Ret....$400.00
Cam Regrind.....$300.00
10.0:1 Pistons Cer top.....$625.00
Intense Shorty Header.....$400.00
Custom 3in Cat back.......$300.00
Exedy Clutch....$1100.00

Total Damage....$4125.00

This with the stuff I have already will be good for over 300WHP and also the internals Can stand A pretty big shot of N2O if you wanted it. Now I know that there are still some weak points but I dont really race the car so I am not going to really worry to much about axles and tranny work. Really If I don't shift to hard the clutch would probably hold up too. So for about three grand (minus clutch) you could have your 300 hp machine.

And I am not saying I will be doing this for sure yet. I have most of the parts but I am getting out of the Army and moving to San diego with my old lady in Dec. So money might be tight then. We will see.

Last edited by shawns94; Aug 3, 2007 at 02:59 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2007 | 03:03 PM
  #13  
elecblue06's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 03-19-07
Posts: 14,901
Likes: 1
From: newburgh,ny
... hmmm is there any place I can find all those stats for the 2.4 this is very very interesting
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2007 | 03:55 PM
  #14  
PuSha050's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-11-05
Posts: 1,122
Likes: 0
From: Yonkers NY
Originally Posted by Onyxd04Redline
And people say porting the head is a waste of money.
if ur refering to me, i never said it was a waste of money, but IMO, for just cracking 300whp its a waste of money
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2007 | 04:01 PM
  #15  
PuSha050's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-11-05
Posts: 1,122
Likes: 0
From: Yonkers NY
Originally Posted by boooobOOO
Do you know anything about cars?
Ur kidding right.. maybe i have a different value of money, or maybe im just used to dsms where u dont need to do that kinda stuff to get 300hp

P&P head....$1000.00
Valve Springs and Ret....$400.00
Cam Regrind.....$300.00
10.0:1 Pistons Cer top.....$625.00
Intense Shorty Header.....$400.00
Custom 3in Cat back.......$300.00
Exedy Clutch....$1100.00

total=$4125 personally i wouldnt spend that much to just get 300whp.. 300hp is very low...ESPECIALLY WHEN THE CAR COMES WITH 200WHP STOCK!!!! so at least.... 4000 for 100hp?? and ur forgettin the pulley, injectors, TUNE, suspension mods, yea now u kno where im goin wit this
unless i was going turbo or a blower swap i dont see it feasable to spend that much money for just 300whp

thats my opinion
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2007 | 04:05 PM
  #16  
shawns94's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 04-16-07
Posts: 695
Likes: 0
From: Fort Leavenworth
Originally Posted by boooobOOO
Do you know anything about cars?
Do you?
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2007 | 04:30 PM
  #17  
elecblue06's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 03-19-07
Posts: 14,901
Likes: 1
From: newburgh,ny
Originally Posted by Jointhis
Hi I am new to the site and wonder if any of you guys Know how much it would cost to install an amp and new subs thanks.
wrong section man.. go into the audio visual thread....
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2007 | 04:46 PM
  #18  
PuSha050's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-11-05
Posts: 1,122
Likes: 0
From: Yonkers NY
Originally Posted by elecblue06
wrong section man.. go into the audio visual thread....
he asked for the time in another thread.. doubt hes real
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2007 | 05:00 PM
  #19  
elecblue06's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 03-19-07
Posts: 14,901
Likes: 1
From: newburgh,ny
Originally Posted by elecblue06
... hmmm is there any place I can find all those stats for the 2.4 this is very very interesting
anyone?
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2007 | 05:09 PM
  #20  
Onyxd04Redline's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 06-11-07
Posts: 5,417
Likes: 0
From: Az
Originally Posted by PuSha050

P&P head....$1000.00
Custom 3in Cat back.......$300.00

I eliminated everything i didn't need from that list. The stock cams/Valvetrain are FINE unless you're going to build up the motor. My Weapon R long tube would work flawlessly with it. With a good 40cfm intake/58+cfm exhaust jump. I think 30whp gain would be a tad conservative. Especially if i was going with a 2.8" pulley.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2007 | 06:02 PM
  #21  
shawns94's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 04-16-07
Posts: 695
Likes: 0
From: Fort Leavenworth
Originally Posted by Onyxd04Redline
I eliminated everything i didn't need from that list. The stock cams/Valvetrain are FINE unless you're going to build up the motor. My Weapon R long tube would work flawlessly with it. With a good 40cfm intake/58+cfm exhaust jump. I think 30whp gain would be a tad conservative. Especially if i was going with a 2.8" pulley.
As much as I don't like your tactfulness on this site I do agree that a P&P head is the best route to go if you already have begun modding. And if your going to go through the hassle of tearing everything apart you might as well throw the rest of the stuff in there. Just my opinion.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2007 | 06:05 PM
  #22  
Onyxd04Redline's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 06-11-07
Posts: 5,417
Likes: 0
From: Az
Originally Posted by shawns94
As much as I don't like your tactfulness on this site I do agree that a P&P head is the best route to go if you already have begun modding. And if your going to go through the hassle of tearing everything apart you might as well throw the rest of the stuff in there. Just my opinion.
I may be an ******* but i know what i'm talking about.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2007 | 06:07 PM
  #23  
shawns94's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 04-16-07
Posts: 695
Likes: 0
From: Fort Leavenworth
Originally Posted by Onyxd04Redline
I may be an ******* but i know what i'm talking about.
Well atleast one of those things is right.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2007 | 06:29 PM
  #24  
n8dogg's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 06-18-06
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
From: Rochester NY
I can see how the stock head can only be so effecient to a point, but I believe that our intake manifolds play a large role in that, eventually were going to be pushing air out faster than we can get air in.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2007 | 06:35 PM
  #25  
Maxim_X's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-14-06
Posts: 2,318
Likes: 2
From: New Bedford, MA
Didn't the GM sport compact build a 400 horse LSj on stock heads?
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:04 AM.