| Forum Jump | Gallery | Social Groups | VBgarage | Videos | Chat | Link To Us | Decals | Site Map | Contact Us |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| General Cobalt General Cobalt, Pursuit, and Ion talk. Post specific discussions in the forums below |
| View Poll Results: Malibu SS vs Malibu Maxx SS vs Cobalt SS/NA | |||
| Malibu SS |
|
15 | 26.79% |
| Malibu Maxx SS |
|
7 | 12.50% |
| Cobalt SS/NA 2.4L |
|
34 | 60.71% |
| Voters: 56. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
|
Cobalt SS/NA vs Malibu SS
Stock are 170hp for the Cobalt and 240 for the Malibu. GM always has great deals on Malibu's, the price is within a few grand, is it not an obvious choice to get the Malibu??
Don't get me wrong, I love the Cobalt, it's hip and looks great, but for nearly the same price I think the Malibu is a step up. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Someone touch my
|
The malibu is more a sporty luxury car. The SS 2.4 has more potential though. Ultimately it ends up depending on what you want out of your car.
These are roughly the 1/4 mile times. 2006 Malibu SS - 15.310 2004 Malibu Maxx - 16.100 2006 Cobalt SS 2.4 - 15.390
__________________
![]() R.I.P 2006 Cobalt SS/SC |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
|
the 07 is 173-175 hp and the 06 are 171hp stock
__________________
2009 RR Civic Si- bone stock, well jdm yellow fogs
2005 Srt-4- well let's just say second time around ....failed 2007 R.Yellow 2.4 SS on boost- Let's not go there after 8/31/09 accident |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
|
eh not a big fan of the malibus. the malibu ss is pretty nice though. the 2.4 NA ss balt i think has alot more support and aftermarket.
__________________
2006 SOM Cobalt SS/NA auto - 20% tints - GMPP intake/exhaust - taillight covers - black halo headlights - Alpine 9886 head unit - SS/SC Front End (thanks raccoon!)
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: 11-01-05
Location: Miami, FL
Member #: 3956
Posts: 7,085
|
I actually really like the Malibu Maxx SS, its kinda odd but it handles really nice, has some balls, and is different. I also like the factory aero kit that it comes with. I see a blue one around here sometimes that looks pretty sweet.
__________________
![]() Vid: Stage 2 versus my car on nitrous If you want a Dual Pass I/C setup, PM me Looking for parts? Check my F/S thread here... |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: 10-01-06
Location: Newport News, VA from Pittsburgh, Pa
Member #: 10834
Posts: 2,939
Images: 157
|
Yeah Malibu's are tight...but economy wise I'd go with the balt. Gas is too high
__________________
2007 Cobalt SS/SC
MODS: Enough to make it faster! HP: Mr. Ed doesn't work for me |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
|
malibu is ugly
__________________
2005 Infiniti G35 Coupe - For the best tuner in the burgh contact MIKRUT TUNING
![]() http://www.motortopia.com/vehicles/v...544/i/ssdragon |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: 03-27-07
Location: Maryland
Member #: 15171
Posts: 303
|
malibus are nice, but heavy and they are not going to have any damn mods for them. if you are going food shopping in it get the malibu. you want fun get the balt, its simple. i cant understand why someone would get the 2.4 balt ss anyway. not that they aren't nice, its just not that much more for the sc. unless you are going for the turbo kit then the 2.4 is actually better then the sc in my opinion
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Senior Member
|
I went with the 2.4 over the ss/sc for the automatic transmission.
__________________
06 yellow 2.4l auto
15.12@89.7 mph 2.21 60' Insulated Injen CAI, dual E-rams w/high voltage mod, Corsa Touring cat-back, CA shorty header, XTC 2.5" b-pipe w/cat, Wester's tune, Mobil 1, Hayden Trans cooler, hardwired radar detector, bumper plugs. Rear deck redo http://cobaltss.net/gallery/files/5/3/1/6/NoSeat.jpg |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: 03-27-07
Location: Maryland
Member #: 15171
Posts: 303
|
yeah thats cool, why would you rather have the auto?
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Haters.......SUCK MY,
|
Quote:
But thats ok the SS/SC is going the way of the dinosaur after this year anyways while our 2.4 may not be called an SS anymore it'll still be around. And as soon as the 2.4 is the only one left you can bet the farm support for it will take off!
__________________
Pontiac saved the best for last. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Member
Join Date: 03-27-07
Location: Maryland
Member #: 15171
Posts: 303
|
Quote:
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Haters.......SUCK MY,
|
Oh thats true. What I ment was the market for our 2.4's will take off since there's no more new SC cars. Not that your stuff will go away but ours will be the only NEW CAR game in town so it would stand to reason the parts support would go up.
__________________
Pontiac saved the best for last. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
I get a regular Malibu as a loaner, I am totally impressed w/ what GM has done w/ the latest of the Malibu's. I had the body stlye before and those are crap. I know the Malibu is not the prettiest of cars, but from the inside it's really nice (nicer than my SC). Even the bsae one handles fairly well! I like the blue MAXX SS's, I would get one as a second car if I had the extra $$$ (would still keep my SC).... my advice DRIVE THEM ALL!!!
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Senior Member
|
i believe the cobalt ss needs high octane, malibu just needs regular.
__________________
"2007VictoryRedChevyCobaltSSupercharged"Mods: *high profile spoiler* GM Stage II*turbotechracing motor mount* turbotechracing Prothane Transmission Mounts* DC strut bar* Va legal window tint:50% front, 35% back & rear*weathertech window vents*
![]() www.MySpace.com My CarDomain MyTubes@youtube.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Member
|
i drive mine with regular and its fine go for the cobalt cause its just much more fun and stylish not to pretty lookin at a malibu at a car show
__________________
Gone: Cobalt SS 2.4L supercharged and tuned :-( fun car
In:Slp 2002 Camaro ss ran 12.59 @115.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: 10-01-06
Location: Newport News, VA from Pittsburgh, Pa
Member #: 10834
Posts: 2,939
Images: 157
|
Quote:
I think 2.4's are a nice car especially economy wise also there is a distinct difference in price between ss/na and ss/sc. $18, 900 and $21, 950=$3,050 difference not including tax, title, and tag and options mainly for the ss/sc which makes that $21, 950 usually higher. With the difference alone you can get a decent turbo kit for the 2.4. So, in answering the question above why would anyone get a 2.4L that might be why. So far as the automatic...lol I don't know. I'll stick with Jackalope's reasons
__________________
2007 Cobalt SS/SC
MODS: Enough to make it faster! HP: Mr. Ed doesn't work for me |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Cobalt SS Supercharged Wins Time Attack on 'Street Tuner Challenge' | brentil | Front Page News | 61 | 10-11-2007 03:11 PM |
| NEW Edmunds Cobalt SS Test Drive VID | JonyyB | General Cobalt | 25 | 10-06-2005 12:06 PM |
| Autoweek Autofile: Cobalt SS | JonyyB | Front Page News | 19 | 07-08-2005 09:13 PM |
| New Cobalt SS commercials at the Grammy's (feb 13) | JonyyB | General Cobalt | 0 | 02-12-2005 11:00 PM |
| New Cobalt Review. | Vendian | General Cobalt | 3 | 02-02-2005 05:15 PM |