08-10 SS Turbocharged General Discussion Discuss the 2008 - 2009 Chevy Cobalt SS Turbocharged. On sale since the second quarter of 2008.

Flex-Fuel Conversion?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 4, 2009 | 11:37 PM
  #26  
04redline0124's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-10-07
Posts: 3,166
Likes: 0
From: West Palm Beach
Originally Posted by ls1fbody
yeah really, you both keep talking about DSM's and mustangs, but this the question asked was about a direct injected cobalt.
I am refering to a NON DI COBALT. I said I dont know about DI, but on another car, all that needs to be changed is fueling applications (more or less, depending on top of car), and you need to tune for it.
Reply
Old May 5, 2009 | 06:49 AM
  #27  
Sweetsandman's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (-1)
 
Joined: 01-15-09
Posts: 4,323
Likes: 0
From: Parma, OH
Originally Posted by ls1fbody
yeah really, you both keep talking about DSM's and mustangs, but this the question asked was about a direct injected cobalt.
I only say those things because this was said...

Originally Posted by randizzle
flex fuel is not the way to go for power. an engine built for E85 should be engineered differently than a gas engine, so the two should not be combined imo.
Like I said, I don't think it will happen on these cars just because of how finicky the computers are. Plus, without the ability to just swap out injectors for huge ones...I just don't know how it could be accomplished on a DI motor that isn't designed for E85.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2009 | 01:23 AM
  #28  
victoryss's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-15-08
Posts: 3,649
Likes: 0
From: Chicago...Land
Originally Posted by ls1fbody
you're talking about heavily modified cars, with much higher compression ratio's. This guy is talking about running it in his car for better fuel economy and a slight power bump. It doesn't work like that.

To run regular gasoline in an engine that makes comparable power on e-85, the compression would have to be so high that it would cause catastrophic detonation on 93 octane fuel.

Lifted this right off wikipedia: E85 consumes more fuel in flex fuel type vehicles when the vehicle uses the same compression for both E85 and gasoline because of its lower stoichiometric fuel ratio and lower heating value. European car maker Saab currently produces a flex fuel version of their 9-5 sedan which consumes the same amount of fuel whether running e85 or gasoline,[13] though it is not available in the United States. So in order to save money at the pump with current flex fuel vehicles available in the United States the price of E85 must be much lower than gasoline. Currently E85 is about 5-10% less expensive in most areas.[14] More than 20 fueling stations across the Midwest are selling E85 at the same price as gasoline.[15] E85 also gets less MPG, at least in flex fuel vehicles. In one test, a Chevy Tahoe flex-fuel vehicle averaged 18 MPG [U.S. gallons] for gasoline, and 13 MPG for E85, or 28% fewer MPG than gasoline.
definitely not true
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2009 | 01:25 AM
  #29  
Gimpster's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-05-09
Posts: 1,028
Likes: 2
From: Des Moines, IA
As a serious conversation...

I'd be curious how much +/- the stock PCM is willing to adjust fuel pressure and IDC to hit target AFR before MIL's start to appear. I'd be willing to drop 1/4 of E85 in my car next fillup and see what it does. Car has a wideband so in theory it should dump in as much fuel it needs to achieve the target AFR. If it starts popping MIL's, then we know we need to do some PCM work. If the car eats 1/4 could try 1/2 tank... basically wean the LTFT's close to E85 as possible.

For a stock turbo'd car, I'd guess the fuel system has +30% fueling capacity left in it. Especially if HPTuners ever decides to unlock the fuel pressure tables for us. Beyond that who knows, I see figures dropped on various forums about our DI.

In the end to do it properly you NEED control in the PCM.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2009 | 04:08 AM
  #30  
IsItFast?'s Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-21-08
Posts: 1,006
Likes: 0
From: Creedmoor, nc
Originally Posted by Gimpster
As a serious conversation...

I'd be curious how much +/- the stock PCM is willing to adjust fuel pressure and IDC to hit target AFR before MIL's start to appear. I'd be willing to drop 1/4 of E85 in my car next fillup and see what it does. Car has a wideband so in theory it should dump in as much fuel it needs to achieve the target AFR. If it starts popping MIL's, then we know we need to do some PCM work. If the car eats 1/4 could try 1/2 tank... basically wean the LTFT's close to E85 as possible.
Only problem is the computer is going to try to achive 14.7:1 - gasoline stoich. Stoich for e85 is closer to 9.765:1. Can you see the problem here? Without tuning it would be dangerous to run e85 - even running only 30% you are still going to be running dangerously lean.
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2009 | 11:25 PM
  #31  
R4race's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 10-12-08
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
From: SE Michigan
I found this in a bulletin

Customer Interest in E85 Fuel
As the retail price of gasoline increases, some locations in the country are seeing price differentials between regular gasoline and E85 where E85 is selling for substantially less than regular grade gasoline. One result of this is that some customers have inquired if they are able to use E85 fuel in non-E85 compatible vehicles.

Important: Only vehicles designated for use with E85 should use E85 blended fuel.

E85 compatibility is designated for vehicles that are certified to run on up to 85% ethanol and 15% gasoline. All other gasoline engines are designed to run on fuel that contains no more than 10% ethanol.

Notice: Use of fuel containing greater than 10% ethanol in non-E85 designated vehicles can cause driveability issues, service engine soon indicators as well as increased fuel system corrosion.

Using E85 Fuels in Non-Compatible Vehicles
General Motors is aware of an increased number of cases where customers have fueled non-FlexFuel designated vehicles with E85. Fueling non-FlexFuel designated vehicles with E85, or with fuels where the concentration of ethanol exceeds the ASTM specification of 10%, will result in one or more of the following conditions:

• Lean Driveability concerns such as hesitations, sags and / or possible stalling.

• SES lights due to OBD codes.

• Fuel Trim codes P0171 and / or P0174.

• Misfire codes (P0300).

• Various O2 sensor codes.

• Disabled traction control or Stability System disabled messages.

• Harsh / Firm transmission shifts.

• Fuel system and / or engine mechanical component degradation.

Notice: Use of fuel containing greater than 10% ethanol in non-E85 designated vehicles can cause driveability issues, service engine soon indicators as well as increased fuel system corrosion.

If the dealer suspects that a non-FlexFuel designated vehicle brought in for service has been fueled with E85, the fuel in the vehicle's tank should be checked for alcohol content with tool J 44175. If the alcohol content exceeds 10% , the fuel should be drained and the vehicle refilled with gasoline - preferably one of the Top Tier brands.

Repairs to non-FlexFuel vehicles that have been fueled with E85 are not covered under the terms of the New Vehicle Warranty.

A complete list of GM’s FlexFuel vehicles can be found in this Service Bulletin, or at www.livegreengoyellow.com.

so basically any e85 conversion would be at your own risk. Do the research and if you go through with it, don't cut any corners.
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2009 | 12:46 AM
  #32  
Gimpster's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-05-09
Posts: 1,028
Likes: 2
From: Des Moines, IA
Thats fine, and a common E85 tuning misunderstanding. When you tune w/E85 you still shoot for whatever AFR's you would for gas. You just have to shoot a lot more fue (~30%ish +/-)l to hit the same AFR is all.

If you don't believe me, just cruise around some of the aftermarket wideband makers sites and read the FAQ's

As I said earlier, without full control of the PCM there isn't a whole lot of point to this. You might get away with 1/4 tank but whats the point.

Originally Posted by IsItFast?
Only problem is the computer is going to try to achive 14.7:1 - gasoline stoich. Stoich for e85 is closer to 9.765:1. Can you see the problem here? Without tuning it would be dangerous to run e85 - even running only 30% you are still going to be running dangerously lean.
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2009 | 12:58 AM
  #33  
IsItFast?'s Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-21-08
Posts: 1,006
Likes: 0
From: Creedmoor, nc
Originally Posted by Gimpster
Thats fine, and a common E85 tuning misunderstanding. When you tune w/E85 you still shoot for whatever AFR's you would for gas. You just have to shoot a lot more fue (~30%ish +/-)l to hit the same AFR is all.

If you don't believe me, just cruise around some of the aftermarket wideband makers sites and read the FAQ's

As I said earlier, without full control of the PCM there isn't a whole lot of point to this. You might get away with 1/4 tank but whats the point.
Right.. I was just reading up on that, I was mistaken. Since the O2 sensor is looking for lambda (1) for stoich, it doesnt care if its gas or whatever. Its just looking at the oxygen content - so lambda 1 for gas is till lambda 1 for E85, it just takes more e85 to get that level.

From what Ive been reading, it should be tuned via lambda readings, not converted to afr readings.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2020 | 12:28 AM
  #34  
Dominic Botsford's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 03-06-20
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin
Colbalt SS/Turbo Charged

Originally Posted by metroplex
Has anyone converted their SS/TC to use E85-E100? This is purely out of curiosity because it'd be interesting to see what kind of torque the LNF can produce using E85.

Would our standard fuel system handle the E85? What about the injectors and fuel pumps? How would the tuning be handled? Is there a way to install an ethanol sensor to switch tunes when it detects the use of E85?
Yes indeed this is working my buddys runs fine with e85 conversion. His is a 08' saab ecotec swap and e85 running aem fuel pump and remove the inline check valve connected to fuel pump (1way). Gets about 28 mpg when easy on it. 12-15 when on the pedal. Roughly 350hp now waiting for winter to subside to make more power. Its pretty darn fast traded up the old tires to some nicer nittos. Also he has meth injection to help with heat but rarely on. So definitely possibly.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2020 | 06:17 AM
  #35  
63 Nova SS's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 06-12-12
Posts: 5,466
Likes: 316
From: Indiana
Wow, that was an 11 year old post. Not sure why your friend would even need meth since E85 has a cooling effect anyway. Bet that saab runs good as they basically have a lsj engine anyway if it's a 4cyl.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
n20saturn
Parts
6
Sep 21, 2015 01:50 AM
jonnymerk
Pictures & Videos
7
Aug 3, 2006 08:57 AM
stlurbanpunk
General Cobalt
19
Apr 19, 2006 03:50 AM
memphisr24
Appearance
3
Mar 3, 2006 01:21 PM
BlackHHR
General Cobalt
4
Aug 21, 2005 09:36 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:58 PM.