08-10 SS Turbocharged General Discussion Discuss the 2008 - 2009 Chevy Cobalt SS Turbocharged. On sale since the second quarter of 2008.

High Wing Spoiler - Necessary or no?

Old Jun 11, 2008 | 05:22 PM
  #1  
Rhayven's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 05-18-08
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: GNV, FL
High Wing Spoiler - Necessary or no?

Kind of curious, those of you that have the high wing spoiler, are you happy you got that as opposed to the stock one? And on the other end of the spectrum, I see tons of pictures ppl posted with a high wing, but does anyone have it in the low rise variation? And if so, do you wish you had gotten the high one? Thanks for any insight!
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2008 | 05:28 PM
  #2  
Scythe_Snake's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-24-06
Posts: 7,856
Likes: 21
From: Matteson, Illinois
Well my high mount came stock. My friend has an 05 who had the high mount but he traded the low off of my 1st car, my LS and he likes it better. its all about preference. most people say you can't see out of the back, but i don't have a problem with that and I am 6 foot even. I like the high mount personally.

BTW post pics! I wanna see. Do you have the silver int as well?
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2008 | 05:32 PM
  #3  
nich7601's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-24-07
Posts: 2,134
Likes: 0
From: a
High rise sucks. It's flimsy at expressway speeds, blocks everything behind you, and only looks good from a 3/4 view of the car. I traded for a low rise, and would prefer to go wingless if I could find one.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2008 | 05:35 PM
  #4  
hawkeyez's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 02-04-06
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
From: Glenville
I personally love the high rise spoiler. Its all a preference of what you like.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2008 | 05:35 PM
  #5  
Mudcrutch's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-10-07
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, OH
The rear is high enough without that thing on there. Low rise or wingless looks best.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2008 | 05:36 PM
  #6  
tombomb's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-12-06
Posts: 2,458
Likes: 0
From: Surrey, B.C.
i kinda like it, it sits JUST blocking the headlights of the car behind you so you never get blinder but you see all the important stuff
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2008 | 05:47 PM
  #7  
Acey's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-02-07
Posts: 8,976
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton
There's tons of SS/SC's with the low rise (which would look the same as an SS/TC with the low rise) because it was an option on '07. The general vibe I get here is that for the SS/SC kit, most people prefer either the high wing or no wing at all.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2008 | 06:00 PM
  #8  
ItalianJoe1's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: 11-01-05
Posts: 12,462
Likes: 61
From: Miami, FL
The car looks silly to me without the bigger wing to go with the extra body kit parts. On a base cobalt or 2.4, that wing looks out of place with no skirts or lips on the car. If you take that wing off of an SS though, it looks funny to me.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2008 | 06:02 PM
  #9  
Nismothecat's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-21-08
Posts: 3,183
Likes: 1
From: Long Beach
no wing would be my choice.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2008 | 06:11 PM
  #10  
krispy's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-26-08
Posts: 3,420
Likes: 3
From: Somewhere, MI
low rise for me, I don't care for park bench sized spoilers
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2008 | 06:21 PM
  #11  
Acey's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-02-07
Posts: 8,976
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton
Originally Posted by ItalianJoe1
The car looks silly to me without the bigger wing to go with the extra body kit parts. On a base cobalt or 2.4, that wing looks out of place with no skirts or lips on the car. If you take that wing off of an SS though, it looks funny to me.
The wing looks fine on 2.4's in my opinion, as the rear bumper is the same size as the SS/SC (just of a different style) and it has the same side skirts.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2008 | 06:52 PM
  #12  
jdbunch08SS's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 03-11-08
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
From: Weatherford, OK
never liked big wings, small wings (spoilers) are what I rather see, atleast the high rise wing isn't that nasty metal x-framed metal surface civic wings
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2008 | 11:12 PM
  #13  
rukkee's Avatar
Premium Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 08-21-06
Posts: 6,574
Likes: 0
From: Western NY
I still cant decide and ive had my car for 2 years . Hi rise looks good from some angles .. low looks good from others but without the hi rise the ss/sc..tc looks like its lacking something. RKsport spoiler FTW.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2008 | 11:16 PM
  #14  
05redline's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 04-23-06
Posts: 1,297
Likes: 0
From: somewhere
It's a FWD car, it doesn't serve any purpose other than attracting riceboys.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2008 | 11:18 PM
  #15  
chris88z24's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-03-07
Posts: 14,142
Likes: 71
From: NY
Originally Posted by hawkeyez
I personally love the high rise spoiler. Its all a preference of what you like.
I personally love your tint.

Low rise all the way for me. Flows better IMO.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2008 | 11:22 PM
  #16  
zackss's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-20-08
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
From: englewood ohio (not california)
Originally Posted by 05redline
It's a FWD car, it doesn't serve any purpose other than attracting riceboys.
haven't you heard of downforce?
noob

joking by the way... i just like the way it looks

and the thickness is the same as a low rise so it's blocking just as much... just higher up
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2008 | 11:26 PM
  #17  
TacticalSS's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 06-10-08
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Wa
Does it actually do something for downforce... wait FWD... never mind!

I think it looks pretty good. Gives it some aggressive looks. The low spoiler makes it seem like it's nothing out of the ordinary, sleeper look.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2008 | 11:27 PM
  #18  
jasonbolt06's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 08-06-07
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
From: oregon
Originally Posted by chris88z24
I personally love your tint.

Low rise all the way for me. Flows better IMO.
i think the highrise get 175 lbs of down force and the low wing get 125lbs of down force it does have a purpose the lowrise does flow better but you dont get all that down force
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2008 | 12:57 AM
  #19  
Acey's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-02-07
Posts: 8,976
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton
Originally Posted by TacticalSS
Does it actually do something for downforce... wait FWD... never mind!
I don't care to find the link for the thread, but I recall someone saying the wing provides about 25 pounds of downforce at freeway speed.
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2008 | 01:25 AM
  #20  
chris88z24's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-03-07
Posts: 14,142
Likes: 71
From: NY
Originally Posted by jasonbolt06
i think the highrise get 175 lbs of down force and the low wing get 125lbs of down force it does have a purpose the lowrise does flow better but you dont get all that down force
It's not functional really.. Yes it does provide downforce but it's far from useful.
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2008 | 01:31 AM
  #21  
an0malous's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-28-06
Posts: 12,577
Likes: 2
From: Canada
Originally Posted by chris88z24
It's not functional really.. Yes it does provide downforce but it's far from useful.
is it NECESSARY? no

is it helpful? most definately.

its been proven that its the equivalent of having 5 heavy sandbags in your trunk at high speeds, to help keep your ass end planted under heavy braking.
for a road racer, id hardly call that "far from useful"
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2008 | 01:31 AM
  #22  
esfkotaro's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-16-08
Posts: 765
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
any spoiler\wing is nearly useless in a day-to-day driving scenario

all depends on how you like your car to look.

swapped my low-pro for a high-rise, first week i had my car. looks best on lower cars though...

i think most would agree that wingless > low pro

as to whether wingless > highrise, or highrise > wingless, it's almost a 50/50 split. personally, I think the car's naked without it.

Edit: I agree with an0m about the road racer part, btw...for a road racer, any extra downforce definately helpful. most people here seem to be drag racers though...which are probably better off without any at all (difference I would imagine, though, is pretty minor in that application.) not to mention, being located higher above the deck, as well as planted behind the rear wheels for leverage, definately would improve stabilility in a road-racing scenario.
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2008 | 02:09 AM
  #23  
firebalt's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 09-25-07
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
From: AHIL
one of the reviews, probably c&d, read that with the low pro you get a little higher top speed or some ****

the high rise def looks hotter though
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2008 | 02:10 AM
  #24  
rudeone79's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 05-16-06
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
From: reseda, ca
I love the way mine looks
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2008 | 02:13 AM
  #25  
cblt12's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-28-05
Posts: 4,368
Likes: 0
From: Socal
wingless ftw in this situation!!! but rk sport>wingless, highrise, and low pro!
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:46 PM.