60-100 in 4.6 seconds.
12-19-2009, 02:46 PM
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
60-100 in 4.6 seconds.
Just like the title says I logged a 60-100 pull in 4.6 seconds today. I could do slightly better but it is not exactly the best DA here in Florida. Here is the proof.
To put this into perspective here is a huge database of cars 60-100 times.
http://www.torquestats.com/index.php?pid=mph60_100
PS, this thread is for Donnie Brasco who says my car is nothing but a dyno queen.
To put this into perspective here is a huge database of cars 60-100 times.
http://www.torquestats.com/index.php?pid=mph60_100
PS, this thread is for Donnie Brasco who says my car is nothing but a dyno queen.
12-19-2009, 02:52 PM
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
12-19-2009, 03:34 PM
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Mine slips too. If you look at the RPMs they spike right I go WOT but the speed hardly goes up. I think I am making over 400 wtrq now at 24 psi.
I stomped on it at 58-59 but if you look the ECM takes a full second from the time I hit 100% pedal to the time it is actually at 100% throttle. I want and need pedal tables to reduce that ETC lag. Imagine if I could cut that 1 second down to 2 tenths or so.
I stomped on it at 58-59 but if you look the ECM takes a full second from the time I hit 100% pedal to the time it is actually at 100% throttle. I want and need pedal tables to reduce that ETC lag. Imagine if I could cut that 1 second down to 2 tenths or so.
Last edited by Terminator2; 12-19-2009 at 03:34 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
12-19-2009, 05:40 PM
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: 04-20-08
Location: Where Hoffa remains
Posts: 3,356
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Term, call me later today or tomorrow.
Last edited by crypticscifer; 12-19-2009 at 05:41 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
12-19-2009, 07:22 PM
#12
Well, I guess I'll add my toad of 4.97 sec then of 63 - 99 since you went public. Amazing what 299 whp, 298 wtq will do, eh?.
I'll try harder next time, I really wasn't planning a 60 - 100 when I did this pull. Got a little clutch slippage on the boost spike at the start of the pull or it would have been better.
This is also a Terminator2 tune, I just have to pull more timing out of it for my EPA fuel and run a different MAF cal for the Hahn CAI.
I'll try harder next time, I really wasn't planning a 60 - 100 when I did this pull. Got a little clutch slippage on the boost spike at the start of the pull or it would have been better.
This is also a Terminator2 tune, I just have to pull more timing out of it for my EPA fuel and run a different MAF cal for the Hahn CAI.
12-19-2009, 10:54 PM
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Yep, I am pretty sure your setup with my tune would yield an 11.8 at 116 easily. I cannot hook at all on my car either the clutch slips or the tires spin.
Last edited by Terminator2; 12-19-2009 at 10:54 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
12-19-2009, 11:07 PM
#15
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Hmmm what?
I just went and looked at the 63-100 mph time and it came in at 4.1 seconds. Dang ETC takes forever to get that throttle open LOL. It was not to 100% actual opening until I was at over 70 mph.
Well, I guess I'll add my toad of 4.97 sec then of 63 - 99 since you went public. Amazing what 299 whp, 298 wtq will do, eh?.
I'll try harder next time, I really wasn't planning a 60 - 100 when I did this pull. Got a little clutch slippage on the boost spike at the start of the pull or it would have been better.
This is also a Terminator2 tune, I just have to pull more timing out of it for my EPA fuel and run a different MAF cal for the Hahn CAI.
I'll try harder next time, I really wasn't planning a 60 - 100 when I did this pull. Got a little clutch slippage on the boost spike at the start of the pull or it would have been better.
This is also a Terminator2 tune, I just have to pull more timing out of it for my EPA fuel and run a different MAF cal for the Hahn CAI.
I just went and looked at the 63-100 mph time and it came in at 4.1 seconds. Dang ETC takes forever to get that throttle open LOL. It was not to 100% actual opening until I was at over 70 mph.
Last edited by Terminator2; 12-19-2009 at 11:09 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
12-20-2009, 12:33 AM
#18
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: 09-06-08
Location: east coast
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is def a ricer forum if people are comparing 60-100mph times. Take the cars down a dragstrip and compare 60ft, 330, 1/8th, 1/8th mph, 1000ft, 1/4, and 1/4 mph.
12-20-2009, 03:08 AM
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: 08-12-08
Location: East Windsor, NJ & Scranton, PA
Posts: 1,360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm in full agreement here...A complete timeslip from a 1/4 mile run is the definitive straight line performance measure.
