Just like the title says I logged a 60-100 pull in 4.6 seconds today. I could do slightly better but it is not exactly the best DA here in Florida. Here is the proof.






To put this into perspective here is a huge database of cars 60-100 times.
http://www.torquestats.com/index.php?pid=mph60_100

PS, this thread is for Donnie Brasco who says my car is nothing but a dyno queen.

 

Damn Man... **** must haul ass. Do u have any 1/4 mil videos? I wanna see that thing in action

 

No, sorry, I dont own a good video camera.

 

**** i really need a new clutch cus at 60 in 3rd that bitch just slips

 

crap man i just spin from 60 - 100. wonder what that would get.

 

Not sure how to read that, but it looks like you were building boost before 60 which would make you a little faster. But I know my car cant do that.

 

Dam term now I have to go try it.... I'l get my Hp screen shots up.....

 

Mine slips too. If you look at the RPMs they spike right I go WOT but the speed hardly goes up. I think I am making over 400 wtrq now at 24 psi.

I stomped on it at 58-59 but if you look the ECM takes a full second from the time I hit 100% pedal to the time it is actually at 100% throttle. I want and need pedal tables to reduce that ETC lag. Imagine if I could cut that 1 second down to 2 tenths or so.

 

Yea it was just a thought. I know if we were closer I would have you tuning my car. My drag setup your tune equals 11's lol.

 

From personal experience on the last tune, it hauled ass, now I can't even imagine how it must be.

Term, call me later today or tomorrow.

 

why not run it down the 1/4?

 

Well, I guess I'll add my toad of 4.97 sec then of 63 - 99 since you went public. Amazing what 299 whp, 298 wtq will do, eh?.


I'll try harder next time, I really wasn't planning a 60 - 100 when I did this pull. Got a little clutch slippage on the boost spike at the start of the pull or it would have been better.

This is also a Terminator2 tune, I just have to pull more timing out of it for my EPA fuel and run a different MAF cal for the Hahn CAI.

 

That tune that was in there before does not even compare. It is so much faster now.

Yep, I am pretty sure your setup with my tune would yield an 11.8 at 116 easily. I cannot hook at all on my car either the clutch slips or the tires spin.

 

hmmm

 

Hmmm what?


I just went and looked at the 63-100 mph time and it came in at 4.1 seconds. Dang ETC takes forever to get that throttle open LOL. It was not to 100% actual opening until I was at over 70 mph.

 

Oh yeah well the Koenigsegg CCR only took 1.4 sec. lol

 

Especially my new set up. 24.5 mandh's and 15 inch rims. 11.8's for sure, maybe even 11.7's, especially with the high boost kit.

 

This is def a ricer forum if people are comparing 60-100mph times. Take the cars down a dragstrip and compare 60ft, 330, 1/8th, 1/8th mph, 1000ft, 1/4, and 1/4 mph.

 

I'm in full agreement here...A complete timeslip from a 1/4 mile run is the definitive straight line performance measure.

 

It's not rice to compare those times. Just retarded to worry about it over 1/4, 60', etc

 

More to a car's acceleration than 1/4 miles times for sure...to call it rice to compare said other times is dumb.

 

Damn, makes my 6 seconds flat feel slow lol

 

Rice was definitely a poor choice of words by the guy who said that. But 1/4 times are more important IMO

 

I wouldn't say more important, just a more easily recognizable stat.

60-100 times are generally a measure of a vehicles top end pull.

 

Term! How do you get the HPT scanner to display the figures that big?