Cobalt LNF MPx Lightweight crank pulley - testing going very well!
SOOO, Back to the point of this thread..... When can I buy one??? 
Thank god!
Thank god!
Last edited by BooSSted; Nov 28, 2010 at 04:49 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
ive seen hondas with lightweight pulleys on for... 4 years now? and no problems... im referring to the 06 si with the nst pulley kit. maybe its just with cobalts? 
u ppl crack me up.
u ppl crack me up.
the forums are full of debates today. anyone look at the BNR thread?!?!? holy cow! some serious thrashing going on there.
Hey Gdubs. Don't put it on if you're just doing it out of spite. I know it's your car and your decision but is the SMALL gain worth the possible problems plus the cost of the part/install?
You will be one of the guinea pigs for the product, thank you and hook us up with feedback eh!
You will be one of the guinea pigs for the product, thank you and hook us up with feedback eh!
I also want proof this is a 100% balanced pulley no questions ask and no if ands or buts. If i get one i will be running it on a harmonic balancer and it better be balanced or im gonna return it thats my issue. I built ecotecs all day for gm so i know whats gonna kill these motors. and not a pulley inless its no balanced then ur gonna take out the seal and the main bearings. in not woried about a seal i can change it in 2 mins and they only cost me 5 bucks from gm
I also want proof this is a 100% balanced pulley no questions ask and no if ands or buts. If i get one i will be running it on a harmonic balancer and it better be balanced or im gonna return it thats my issue. I built ecotecs all day for gm so i know whats gonna kill these motors. and not a pulley inless its no balanced then ur gonna take out the seal and the main bearings. in not woried about a seal i can change it in 2 mins and they only cost me 5 bucks from gm
Take a close look at this pic:
See those two *holes* drilled on the inner ring? That's where material was removed for balance.
I think that *00* painted on there verifies the balance.
Now this is just my take...someone can correct me if I'm wrong
Some additional reads:
We're talking DAMPENING HERE...NOT BALANCE.
From EVO forum:
http://forums.evolutionm.net/7837770-post4.html
I recall one dedicated racer in here who resolved all his rapid bearing wear issues simply by going from a solid aluminum pulley back to a dampener. That was convincing enough.
Grab onto a steel pipe and have someone hit it repeatedly with a ball peen hammer. Those ringing vibrations that make your hand hurt get transmitted to critical friction surfaces. That rubber ring absorbs those vibrations as they reach the nose of the crank. A Fluidampr is even more efficient. In fact, there was an article in a magazine not long ago whereby it was demonstrated that both the ATI and Fluidampr increased power as compared to a solid pulley on a V8 engine.
Crank driven oil pumps tend to suffer premature failure when the crank is undampened. This isn't a problem with a 4G63, but it demonstrates what crank harmonics can do.
In summary, there isn't any way I'd run a high torque engine without a dampened crank. There's nothing to be gained from it, only something to be lost
CRANKSHAFT TORSION AND DAMPERS:
Torsion - The hidden problem with the crank system – and why it needs a damper.
http://www.bhjdynamics.com/downloads...amper_Info.pdf
We're talking DAMPENING HERE...NOT BALANCE.
From EVO forum:
http://forums.evolutionm.net/7837770-post4.html
I recall one dedicated racer in here who resolved all his rapid bearing wear issues simply by going from a solid aluminum pulley back to a dampener. That was convincing enough.
Grab onto a steel pipe and have someone hit it repeatedly with a ball peen hammer. Those ringing vibrations that make your hand hurt get transmitted to critical friction surfaces. That rubber ring absorbs those vibrations as they reach the nose of the crank. A Fluidampr is even more efficient. In fact, there was an article in a magazine not long ago whereby it was demonstrated that both the ATI and Fluidampr increased power as compared to a solid pulley on a V8 engine.
Crank driven oil pumps tend to suffer premature failure when the crank is undampened. This isn't a problem with a 4G63, but it demonstrates what crank harmonics can do.
In summary, there isn't any way I'd run a high torque engine without a dampened crank. There's nothing to be gained from it, only something to be lost
CRANKSHAFT TORSION AND DAMPERS:
Torsion - The hidden problem with the crank system – and why it needs a damper.
http://www.bhjdynamics.com/downloads...amper_Info.pdf
Last edited by ronn; Nov 29, 2010 at 01:41 AM.
Finally people that understand what I was trying to get across.....thank you!
Im not at all trying to be a dick in any way. Just trying to warn people of the harmful effects of an undampned/unbalanced crank pulley can do. In no way am I an ecotec engineer but I kno quite a bit about this engine.
Im not at all trying to be a dick in any way. Just trying to warn people of the harmful effects of an undampned/unbalanced crank pulley can do. In no way am I an ecotec engineer but I kno quite a bit about this engine.
For the scientific minded... Mechanical resonance - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Will the pulley cause the engine to go wack... probably not but it does increase the chance to do it.
Will the pulley cause the engine to go wack... probably not but it does increase the chance to do it.
just wanna put out there, theres a chance your engine will go out of wack with a tune as well. probably more so than a pulley.
MPX, im sure ppl would chill more if you made a pulley with a dampner in it..
MPX, im sure ppl would chill more if you made a pulley with a dampner in it..
Dart I agree with u...but the costs are insane that's why the ati super dampner is 400+ dollars ya kno?
This would be a great piece to buy and install on track days tho. I wouldn't personally run it on a daily basis.
This would be a great piece to buy and install on track days tho. I wouldn't personally run it on a daily basis.
I had a lightwieght/underdrive pulley on my 03 cavalier for 4 years and over 60k miles and never had a problem with the engine. This was my dd. Mind u i raced the car everywhere i went.
but damn, thats crazy. id love to get the mpx pulley for the throttle response, the ss/tc seems to really need more IMO. guess ill see what happens. idk if im getting one or not
Finally people that understand what I was trying to get across.....thank you!
Im not at all trying to be a dick in any way. Just trying to warn people of the harmful effects of an undampned/unbalanced crank pulley can do. In no way am I an ecotec engineer but I kno quite a bit about this engine.
Im not at all trying to be a dick in any way. Just trying to warn people of the harmful effects of an undampned/unbalanced crank pulley can do. In no way am I an ecotec engineer but I kno quite a bit about this engine.
While I understand all of the theories and they seem to point to the pulley causing damage, the fact of the matter is, they do not. I again, base this on my personal experience, not from what I have read or been told.
I ran the rsm pulleys on my 99 grand am 2.4 and it messed up the seal with prolonged use..just saying there is a risk involved with this mod is all. I kno honda guys running pulleys like these without any problems..and other platforms as well. But for some reason the ecotec does not like aftermarket pulleys
I ran the rsm pulleys on my 99 grand am 2.4 and it messed up the seal with prolonged use..just saying there is a risk involved with this mod is all. I kno honda guys running pulleys like these without any problems..and other platforms as well. But for some reason the ecotec does not like aftermarket pulleys
just because it worked well on other cars like Hondas, doesn't mean it's going to be problem free with this engine.
Trust me..it's NOT balanced....but you prolly can have that done at a machine shop?
Take a close look at this pic:
See those two *holes* drilled on the inner ring? That's where material was removed for balance.
I think that *00* painted on there verifies the balance.
Now this is just my take...someone can correct me if I'm wrong

Take a close look at this pic:
See those two *holes* drilled on the inner ring? That's where material was removed for balance.
I think that *00* painted on there verifies the balance.
Now this is just my take...someone can correct me if I'm wrong
wow...
I've seen some weird stuff on CSS, but this one takes the cake.
I will admit that in the past I didn't understand that GM changed from a crank mounted balancer, to a dampener;
but considering some of the mods that people here do, I am floored by the static that MPx is getting for an item that most FWD enthusiasts typically trip over themselves to buy...
...
I actually was going to come purely to ask one question to MPx (something recently touched upon);
Question:
Is this item in finished form zero balanced?
(I already have some MPx parts I plan on buying - after paying off the credit card again, at which time my brother will add some parts to my order for his '09 SRT4;
so I'm not just wasting your time.)
Now, back to the jist of what I started pseudo ranting about;
Ideally there would be a rubber isolator on this to remove any torsional stresses from the accessory belt to the crank snout, and any item like this will not yield a single HP, but rather allow the engine to change RPM's faster - much like a lightweight flywheel, or using the GMPP's neutral balance shaft's...
IMHO, if this is zero balenced, that's a serious "plus" for the part...
FYI: I run a Centerforce dual friction as well as a Fidanza lightweight flywheel on my Grand Am, both parts I was advised against running...
I've seen some weird stuff on CSS, but this one takes the cake.
I will admit that in the past I didn't understand that GM changed from a crank mounted balancer, to a dampener;
but considering some of the mods that people here do, I am floored by the static that MPx is getting for an item that most FWD enthusiasts typically trip over themselves to buy...
...
I actually was going to come purely to ask one question to MPx (something recently touched upon);
Question:
Is this item in finished form zero balanced?
(I already have some MPx parts I plan on buying - after paying off the credit card again, at which time my brother will add some parts to my order for his '09 SRT4;
so I'm not just wasting your time.)
Now, back to the jist of what I started pseudo ranting about;
Ideally there would be a rubber isolator on this to remove any torsional stresses from the accessory belt to the crank snout, and any item like this will not yield a single HP, but rather allow the engine to change RPM's faster - much like a lightweight flywheel, or using the GMPP's neutral balance shaft's...
IMHO, if this is zero balenced, that's a serious "plus" for the part...
FYI: I run a Centerforce dual friction as well as a Fidanza lightweight flywheel on my Grand Am, both parts I was advised against running...
I can understand your concern, but Id like to point out a few important things.
- MRZ released a crank pulley for the Ecotec sometime around mid 2009ish? Its now almost 2011 so there have been a good amount of people with the MRZ with a lot of mileage driven.
There are even a few threads on this forum about the MRZ, and other than some leaking around the snout due to a machining problem, there have been no failures mentioned in any threads. The only problem people seem to have with the MRZ are:
-the belt they provide is a little too big, so some people have had to get smaller sized belts
-some people have had some alternator charge output concerns.
NOW, with the MPx being stock size, and using the factory belt, neither of the two concerns above will happen with the MPx lightweight crank pulley.
- MRZ released a crank pulley for the Ecotec sometime around mid 2009ish? Its now almost 2011 so there have been a good amount of people with the MRZ with a lot of mileage driven.
There are even a few threads on this forum about the MRZ, and other than some leaking around the snout due to a machining problem, there have been no failures mentioned in any threads. The only problem people seem to have with the MRZ are:
-the belt they provide is a little too big, so some people have had to get smaller sized belts
-some people have had some alternator charge output concerns.
NOW, with the MPx being stock size, and using the factory belt, neither of the two concerns above will happen with the MPx lightweight crank pulley.
GM stage 1 on the LNF passed 100,000 mile durability tests, of course, they did not have a liteweight crank pulley. Its clear that prospective purchasers should be made aware of the potential pitfalls, and please listen to folks like Blazin' who are stating the facts.
Last edited by qwikredline; Jan 2, 2011 at 09:47 AM.



